|
|
Volumn 49, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 921-925
|
|
A comment from regulatory view on the article: "Risk assessment of carcinogens and the threshold range, Part I to III";Ein kommentar aus regulatorischer sicht zum beitrag: "Die risikobewertung von kanzerogenen und die wirkungsschwelle, teil I bis III"
a
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
CARCINOGEN;
MUTAGENIC AGENT;
CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER;
DOSE RESPONSE;
ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE;
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING;
GERMANY;
GOVERNMENT;
HUMAN;
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE CONCENTRATION;
METHODOLOGY;
NEOPLASM;
PROGNOSIS;
QUALITY CONTROL;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
RISK FACTOR;
RISK MANAGEMENT;
SHORT SURVEY;
UNITED STATES;
BENCHMARKING;
CARCINOGENS;
DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG;
ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE;
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING;
GERMANY;
HUMANS;
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE CONCENTRATION;
MUTAGENS;
NEOPLASMS;
PROGNOSIS;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
RISK FACTORS;
RISK MANAGEMENT;
THRESHOLD LIMIT VALUES;
UNITED STATES;
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY;
|
|
EID: 33748595807
PISSN: 14369990
EISSN: 14371588
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s00103-006-0029-1 Document Type: Short Survey |
|
Times cited : (1)
|
|
References (5)
|
