Amodal completion with background determines depth from monocular gap stereopsis

Vision Research

Volumn 46, Issue 22, 2006, Pages 3771-3774

  Grove, Philip M ^a   Ben Sachtler, W L ^a   Gillam, Barbara J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Amodal completion; Binocular vision; Da Vinci stereopsis; Monocular gap stereopsis; Monocular zone; Unpaired regions

Indexed keywords

AMODAL COMPLETION; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; COLOR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MONOCULAR GAP STEREOPSIS; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SURFACE PROPERTY;

COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 33748574015     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.06.020     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Anderson B.L., and Julesz B. A theoretical analysis of illusory contour formation in stereopsis. Psychological Review 102 (1995) 705-743
2. Anderson B.L., Singh M., and Fleming R.W. The interpolation of object and surface structure. Cognitive Psychology 44 (2002) 148-190
3. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 10 (1997) 437-442
4. Gillam B.J., Blackburn S., and Nakayama K. Stereopsis based on monocular gaps: Metrical encoding of depth and slant without matching contours. Vision Research 39 (1999) 493-502
5. Gillam B.J., and Grove P.M. Slant or occlusion: global factors resolve stereoscopic ambiguity in sets of horizontal lines. Vision Research 44 (2004) 2359-2366
6. Grove P.M., Byrne J.M., and Gillam B.J. How configurations of binocular disparity determine whether stereoscopic slant or stereoscopic occlusion is seen. Perception 34 (2005) 1083-1094
7. Grove P.M., Gillam B.J., and Ono H. Content and context of monocular regions determine perceived depth in random dot, unpaired background and phantom stereograms. Vision Research 42 (2002) 1859-1870
8. Howard I.P., and Rogers B.J. Seeing in depth. Depth Perception Vol. 2 (2002), I. Porteous, Toronto
9. Nakayama K., and Shimojo S. Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces. Science 257 (1992) 1357-1363
10. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10 (1997) 437-442
11. Pianta M.J., and Gillam B.J. Paired and unpaired features can be equally effective in human depth perception. Vision Research 43 (2003) 1-6
12. Pianta M.J., and Gillam B.J. Monocular gap stereopsis: manipulation of the out edge disparity and the shape of the gap. Vision Research 43 (2003) 1937-1950
13. Ramachandran V.S. Capture of stereopsis and apparent motion by illusory contours. Perception and Psychophysics 39 (1986) 361-363
14. Rock I. The logic of perception (1983), MIT Press, Cambridge
15. Yin C., Kellman P.J., and Shipley T.F. Surface integration influences depth discrimination. Vision Research 40 (2000) 1969-1978