New formulation of sublingual misoprostol (25mcg) for induction of labor;Nova formulação de misoprostol sublingual na indução do trabalho de parto

Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 251-255

  Feitosa, Francisco Edson De Lucena ^a,b   De Amorim, Melania Maria Ramos ^a   Alencar Jr , Carlos Augusto ^a   Coutinho, Isabela Cristina ^a   Sampaio, Zuleika Studart ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF CEARÁ   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Labor; Labor induction; Misoprostol; Prostaglandins; Sublingual

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748568495     PISSN: 01044230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-42302006000400026     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Wing DA. Labor induction with misoprostol. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:339-45.
2. Rouse DJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. Criteria for failed labor induction: prospective evaluation of a standardized protocol. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:671-7.
3. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde / DataSUS. Nascidos vivos. Disponível em: http://www.datasus.gov.br. [citado 11 ago 2003].
4. Herting RL, Nissen CH. Overview of misoprostol clinical experience. Dig Dis Sci 1986;31(2 Suppl):47-54.
5. Mariani Neto C, Leão, EJ, Barreto EMCP, Kenj G, Aquino MMA, Tuffi VHB. Uso do misoprostol para induçäo do parto com feto morto. Rev Paul Med 1987;105:325-8.
6. Margulies M, Catuzzi P, Voto LS, Imaz FU. Induccion deI trabajo de parto con un analogo de la PgE1. Prensa Med Arg 1991;78:9-13.
7. Alfirevic Z. Oral misoprostol for induction of labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(2):CD001338.
8. Hofmeyr GJ, Gulmezoglu AM. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(1):CD000941.
9. How HY, Leaseburge L, Khoury JC, Siddiqi TA, Spinnato JA, Sibai BM. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:911-5.
10. Fisher SA, Mackenzie VP, Davies GA. Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:906-10.
11. Zieman M, Fong SK, Benowitz NL, Banskter D, Darney PD. Absorption kinetics of misoprostol with oral or vaginal administration. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:88-92.
12. Shetty A, Mackie L, Danielian P, Rice P, Templeton A. Sublingual compared with oral misoprostol in term labour induction: a randomized controlled trial. BJOG 2002; 109:645-50.
13. Shetty A, Danielian P, Templeton A. A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol tablets in induction of labour at term. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2001;108:238-43.
14. Shetty A, Danielian P, Templeton A. Sublingual misoprostol for the induction of labor at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:72-6.
15. RCOG. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists - Induction of labour: Evidence based. Clinical Guidelines no 9. RCOG Clinical effectiveness support unit, Jun 2001. Disponível em URL: www.rcog.uk/resources/public/ rcog_inductionof_labour.pdf
16. Zieman M, Fong SK, Benowitz NL, Banskter D, Darney PD. Absorption kinetics of misoprostol with oral or vaginal administration. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:88-92.
17. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria 344-12/05/98 da ANVISA. DOU de 22/06/2001. Seção 1, p.150.
18. Sampaio ZS, Alencar Jr CA, Feitosa FEL, Amorim MMR. Fatores associados ao parto vaginal em gestantes de alto risco submetidas a indução do parto com misoprostol. RBGO 2004;26:21-9.
19. Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Delke I. Labor induction with 25mcg versus 50mcg intravaginal misoprostol: A systematic Review. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:145-51.