Angiographic computed tomography is comparable to multislice computed tomography in lumbar myelographic imaging

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 739-741

  Buhk, Jan Hendrik ^a   Elolf, Erck ^a   Knauth, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Angiographic ct; Computed tomography; Flat panel; Myelographic ct; Myelography; Rotational angiography; Spine

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS;

ANGIOGRAPHIC CT; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FLAT PANEL; LUMBAR SPINES; MULTISLICE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MYELOGRAPHIC CT; MYELOGRAPHY; ROTATIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY; SPINE;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN SLICE; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; LUMBAR SPINE; MYELOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; SPINE DISEASE;

EID: 33748567793     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rct.0000228152.73528.54     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Tsuchiya K, Katase S, Aoki C. Application of multi-detector row helical scanning to postmyelographic CT. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1438-1443.
2. Saint-Louis LA. Lumbar spinal stenosis assessment with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and myelography. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;384:122-136.
3. Schumacher M, Kutluk K, Ott D. Digital rotational radiography in neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1989;10:644-649.
4. Kufeld M, Claus B, Campi A, et al. Three-dimensional rotational myelography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:1290-1293.
5. Zellerhoff M, Scholz B, Ruehrnschopf EP, et al. Low contrast 3D reconstruction from C-arm data. Proc SPIE. 2005;5745:646-655.
6. Loose R, Wucherer M, Brunner T, et al. [Visualization of 3D low contrast objects by CT cone-beam reconstruction of a rotational angiography with a dynamic solid body detector] (article in german). RoFo 2005;S1:PO 160.
7. Kalender WA. The use of flat-panel detectors for CT imaging. Radiologe. 2003;43:379-387. article in German.
8. Bischoff RJ, Rodriguez RP, Gupta K, et al. A comparison of computed tomography-myelography, magnetic resonance imaging, and myelography in the diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus and spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord. 1993;6:289-295.
9. Akhtar M, Vakharia KT, Mishell J, et al. Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational vs. standard coronary angiography using a flat-panel detector. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005;66:43-49.
10. Schueler BA, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ. 3D cerebral angiography: radiation dose comparison with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:1898-1901.
11. Suzuki S, Furui S, Kobayashi I, et al. Radiation dose to patients and radiologists during transcatheter arterial embolization: comparison of a digital flat-panel system and conventional unit. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:855-859.