Analysis of LFP phase predicts sensory response of barrel cortex

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 1658-1663

  Haslinger, R ^a   Ulbert, I ^a,b   Moore, C I ^a,c   Brown, E N ^a   Devor, A ^a,d  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLOGY   (Hungary)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHLORALOSE;

ANESTHESIA; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPOLARIZATION; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRODE; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; HYPERPOLARIZATION; NONHUMAN; OSCILLATION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VIBRISSA;

ANIMALS; CEREBRAL CORTEX; MEMBRANE POTENTIALS; OSCILLOMETRY; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX;

EID: 33748560797     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01288.2005     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anninos P, Zenone S, Cyrulnik R, and Elul R. Encoding of visual information: correlation of EEG response to intracellular response. Brain Res 244: 182, 1982.
2. Arieli A, Shoham D, Hildesheim R, and Grinvald A. Coherent spatiotemporal patterns of ongoing activity revealed by real-time optical imaging coupled with single-unit recording in the cat visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 73: 2072-2093, 1995.
3. Arieli A, Sterkin A, Grinvald A, and Aertsen A. Dynamics of ongoing activity: explanation of the large variability in evoked cortical responses. Science 273: 1868-1871, 1996.
4. Armstrong-James M, Fox K, and Das-Gupta A. Flow of excitation within rat barrel cortex on striking a single vibrissa. J Neurophysiol 68: 1345-1358, 1992.
5. Azouz R and Gray CM. Cellular mechanisms contributing to response variability of cortical neurons in vivo. J Neurosci 19: 2209-2223, 1999.
6. Castro-Alamancos MA. Role of thalamocortical sensory suppression during arousal: focusing sensory inputs in neocortex. J Neurosci 22: 9651-9655, 2002.
7. Castro-Alamancos MA and Oldford E. Cortical sensory suppression during arousal is due to the activity-dependent depression of thalamocortical synapses. J Physiol 541: 319-331, 2002.
8. Compte A, Sanches-Vivez MV, McCormick DA, and Wang XJ. Cellular and network mechanisms of slow oscillatory activity (<1Hz) and wave propagations in a cortical network model. J Neurophysiol 89: 2707-2725, 2003.
9. Contreras D, Timofeev I, and Steriade M. Mechanisms of long-lasting hyperpolarization underlying slow sleep oscillations in cat corticothalamic networks. J Physiol 494: 251-264, 1996.
10. Creutzfeldt O, Watanabe S, and Lux H. Relations between EEG phenomena and potentials of single cortical cells I. Evoked responses after thalamic and epicortical stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 20: 1-18, 1966a.
11. Creutzfeldt O, Watanabe S, and Lux H. Relations between EEG phenomena and potentials of single cortical cells. II. Spontaneous and convulsoid activity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 20: 19-37, 1966b.
12. Devor A, Dunn AK, Andermann ML, Ulbert I, Boas DA, and Dale AM. Coupling of total hemoglobin concentration, oxygenation, and neural activity in rat somatosensory cortex. Neuron 39: 353-359, 2003.
13. Devor A, Ulbert I, Dunn AK, Narayanan SN, Jones SR, Andermann ML, Boas DA, and Dale AM. Coupling of the cortical hemodynamic response to cortical and thalamic neuronal activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 3822-3827, 2005.
14. Eggermont J and Smith G. Synchrony between single-unit activity and local field potentials in relation to periodicity coding in primary auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 73: 227-245, 1995.
15. Kisley MA and Gerstein GL. Trial-to-trial variability and state-dependent modulation of auditory-evoked responses in cortex. J Neurosci 19: 10451-10460, 1999.
16. Le Van Quyen L, Foucher J, Lachaux J, Rodriguez E, Lutz A, Martinerie J, and Varela FJ. Comparison of Hilbert transform and wavelet methods for the analysis of neuronal synchrony. J Neurosci Methods 111: 83-98, 2001.
17. Linkenkaer-Hansen K, Nikulin VV, Palva S, Ilmoniemi RJ, and Palva JM. Prestimulus oscillations enhance psychophysical performance in humans. J Neurosci 24: 10186-10190, 2004.
18. Massimini M, Rosanova M, and Mariotti M. EEG slow (∼1Hz) waves are associated with nonstationarity of thalmo-cortical sensory processing in the sleeping human. J Neurophysiol 89: 1205-1213, 2003.
19. McCormick DA, Shu Y, Hasenstaub A, Sanches-Vivez MV, Badoual M, and Bal T. Persistent cortical activity: mechanisms of generation and effects on neuronal excitability. Cereb Cortex 13: 1219-1231, 2003.
20. Moore CI and Nelson SB. Spatio-temporal subthreshold receptive fields in the vibrissa representation of rat primary somatosensory cortex. J Neurophysiol 80: 2882-2892, 1998.
21. Petersen C, Grinvald A, and Sakmann B. Spatiotemporal dynamics of sensory responses in layer 2/3 of rat barrel cortex measured in vivo by voltage-sensitive dye imaging combined with whole-cell recordings and neuron reconstructions. J Neurosci 23: 1298-1309, 2003a.
22. Petersen C, Hahn T, Mehta M, Grinvald A, and Sakmann B. Interaction of sensory responses with spontaneous depolarization in layer 2/3 barrel cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 13638-13643, 2003b.
23. Pikovsky A, Rosenblum M, and Kurths J. Synchronization - A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge, 2001.
24. Proekt A, Brezina V, and Weiss KR. Dynamical basis of intentions and expectations in a simple neuronal network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 9447-9452, 2004.
25. Rudolph M and Destexhe A. The discharge variability of neocortical neurons during high-conductance states. Neuroscience 119: 855-873, 2003.
26. Sachdev R, Ebener FF, and Wilson CJ. The effect of sub-threshold up and down states on the whisker-evoked response in somatosensory cortex. J Neurophysiol 92: 3511-3512, 2004.
27. Shu Y, Hasenstaub A, and McCormick DA. Turning on and off recurrent balanced cortical activity. Nature 423: 288-293, 2003.
28. Simons DJ and Carvell GE. Thalamocortical response transformation in the rat vibrissa/barrel system. J Neurophysiol 61: 311-330, 1989.
29. Steriade M, Nunez A, and Amzica F. A novel slow (<1Hz) oscillation of neocortical neurons in vivo: depolarizing and hyperpolarizing components. J Neurosci 13: 3252-3265, 1993.
30. Steriade M, Timofeev I, and Grenier F. Natural waking and sleep states: a view from inside neocortical neurons. J Neurophysiol 85: 1969-1985, 2001.
31. Temereanca S and Simons DJ. Local field potentials and the encoding of whisker deflections by population firing synchrony in thalamic barreloids. J Neurophysiol 89: 2137-2145, 2003.
32. Timofeev I, Conteras D, and Steriade M. Synaptic responsiveness of cortical and thalamic neurones during various phases of slow sleep oscillation in cat. J Physiol 494: 265-278, 1996.
33. Timofeev I and Steriade M. Cellular mechanisms underlying intrathalamic augmenting responses of reticular and relay neurons. J Neurophysiol 76: 4152-4168, 1996.
34. Tolhurst DJ, Movshon JA, and Thompson JD. The dependence of response amplitude and variance of cat visual cortical neurons on stimulus contrast. Exp Brain Res 41: 414-419, 1981.
35. Tsodyks M, Kenet T, Grinvald A, and Arieli A. Linking spontaneous activity of single cortical neurons and the underlying functional architecture. Science 286: 1943-1946, 1999.
36. Ulbert I, Heit G, Madsen J, Karmos G, and Halgren E. Laminar analysis of human neocortical interictal spike generation and propagation: current source density and multiunit analysis in vivo. Epilepsia 45, Suppl 4: 48-56, 2004.
37. Wilson CJ and Kawaguchi Y. The origins of two-state spontaneous membrane potential fluctuations of neostriatal spiny neurons. J Neurosci 16: 2397-2410, 1996.