|
Volumn 40, Issue 17, 2006, Pages 5527-5531
|
Comparative study on the regeneration of flue-gas desulfurizing agents by using conventional electrodialysis (ED) and bipolar membrane electrodialysis (BMED)
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
BIPOLAR MEMBRANE ELECTRODIALYSIS (BMED);
BIPOLAR MEMBRANES;
PIPERAZINE;
COSTS;
DESULFURIZATION;
ELECTRIC POTENTIAL;
ELECTRODIALYSIS;
NITROGEN COMPOUNDS;
INORGANIC SALT;
PIPERAZINE;
COSTS;
DESULFURIZATION;
ELECTRIC POTENTIAL;
ELECTRODIALYSIS;
NITROGEN COMPOUNDS;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS;
ORGANIC COMPOUND;
POLLUTION CONTROL;
REGENERATION;
ARTICLE;
BIPOLAR MEMBRANE ELECTRODIALYSIS;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COST;
DESULFURIZATION;
ECONOMICS;
ELECTRIC CURRENT;
ELECTRIC POTENTIAL;
ELECTRODIALYSIS;
ENERGY CONSUMPTION;
FLUE GAS;
POLLUTION;
POLLUTION CONTROL;
RECYCLING;
THERMOSTABILITY;
DIALYSIS;
ELECTROCHEMISTRY;
GASES;
MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL;
PIPERAZINES;
SULFUR;
|
EID: 33748554194
PISSN: 0013936X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1021/es060525c Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (18)
|
References (9)
|