Domestic information and communication technologies and subject-object relations: Gender, identity, and family life

Journal of Family Studies

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 95-112

  Arnold, Michael ^a   Shepherd, Chris ^a   Gibbs, Martin ^a   Mecoles, Karen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Affect; Domestic ICTs; Domestic probes; Gender; Identity; Interfamily relationships; Social roles; Sociological associations; Subject Object Relations

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748549961     PISSN: 13229400     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5172/jfs.327.12.1.95     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adam, B. (1996).Time for feminist approaches to technology, "nature" and work. In J. Pilcher & A. Coffey (Eds.), Gender and qualitative research (pp. 149-163). Aldershot, UK:Avebury.
2. Arnold, M. (2004).The connected home: Probing the effects and affects of domesticated ICTs. Proceedings of the Eighth Biennial Participatory Design Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, pp. 183-186.
3. Arnold, M., Shepherd, C., Gibbs, M., & Mecoles, K. (2006).The sociology of associations in family research and practice. Journal of Family Studies, 12(1), 10-12.
4. Blythe, M., & Monk, A. (2002). Notes towards an ethnography of domestic technology. Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (DIS 2002) (pp. 277-281). New York: ACM Press.
5. Chabaud-Rychter, D. (1995). The configuration of domestic appliances in the home. In K. Grint & R. Gill (Eds.), The gender-technology relation: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 95-111). London:Taylor & Francis.
6. Cockburn, C., & Fürst-Dilic, R. (1994). Introduction: Looking for the gender/technology relation. In C. Cockburn & R. Fürst-Dilic (Eds.), Bringing technology home: Gender and technology in a changing Europe (pp. 1-21). Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
7. Connell, R. W. (1987) Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
8. nd ed.). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
9. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rochberg-Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of thing: Domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Frissen,V. (1995). Gender is calling: Some reflections on past, present and future uses of the telephone. In K. Grint & R. Gill (Eds.), The gender-technology relation: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 79-94). London: Taylor & Francis.
11. Gaver, B. (2001, October). Designing for ludic aspects of everyday life. The European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics (ERCIM) News, 47, p. 20.
12. Gaver, B. (2002, April). Home is heaven for beginners: Probes and proposals for domestic technologies. Position paper for Technology for Families workshop at Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (CHI2002), 20-25 April, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Available at: http.//www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/ interliving/chi02/gaver.pdf
13. Gaver, W., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., & Walker, B. (2004). Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. Interactions, 11(5), 53-56.
14. Gaver, B., & Dunne,T. (1999). Design: Cultural probes. Interactions, 6(1), 21-29.
15. Gaver, B., & Martin, H. (2000). Alternatives: Exploring information appliances through conceptual design proposals. Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2000), The Hague, Netherlands, 2(1), 209-216.
16. Green, E., Owen,J., & Pain, D. (Eds.). (1993). Gendered by design? Information and office systems. London: Taylor and Francis.
17. Haring, K. (2003). The "freer men" of ham radio: How a technical hobby provided social and spatial distance. Technology and Culture, 44(4), 734-761.
18. nd International Workshop on Cooperative Buildings (CoBuild'99) (pp. 199-207). Pittsburgh, USA; Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
19. Lally, E. (2002). At home with computers. Oxford, UK; New York: Berg.
20. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
21. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social:An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23. Law,J., & Hassard,J. (Eds.). (1999). Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwells.
24. Lerman, N.E., Oldenziel, R., & Mohun, A.P. (2003). Introduction: Interrogating boundaries. In N.E. Lerman, R. Oldenziel, & A.P. Mohun (Eds.), Gender and technology: A reader (pp. 1-12). Baltimore, MD:The John Hopkins University Press.
25. MacKinnon, N.J. (1994). Symbolic interactionism as affect control. New York: State University of New York Press.
26. Morley, D. (1999). Family television: Cultural power and domestic leisure. London: Routledge.
27. Morley, D. (2000). Home territories: Media, mobility and identity. London: Routledge.
28. Murray, F. (1993).A separate reality: Science, technology and masculinity. In E. Green, J. Owen, & D. Pain. Gendered by design? Information and office systems (pp. 64-80). London:Taylor and Francis.
29. Oudshoorn, N., & Rommes, E. (2004). Configuring the user as everybody: Gender and design cultures in information and communication technologies. Science, Technology and Human Values, 29(1), 30-63.
30. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic books.
31. Pilcher,J. (1999). Women in contemporary Britain. London; New York: Routledge.
32. Rakow, L. (Ed.). (1992). Women making meaning: New feminist directions in communication. London; New York: Routledge.
33. Spender, D. (1995). Nattering on the net: Women, power and Cyberspace. North Melbourne: Spinifex.
34. Stocker, M., with Hegeman, E. (1996). Valuing emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Venkatesh, A. (1996). Computers and other interactive technologies for the home. Communications of the ACM, 39(12), 47-54.
36. Wajcman,J. (1994).Technological a/genders:Technology, culture and class. In L. Green & R. Guinery (Eds.), Framing technology: Society, choice and change (pp. 3-14). St. Leonards, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.
37. Wajcman,J. (1995). Feminist theories of technology. In S.Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J.C. Petersen, & Pinch, T. (Eds.). Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 189-204). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Wajcman,J. (2004). TechnoFeminism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
39. Wolf, N. (1990). The beauty myth. London: Chatto & Windus.