Substance abuse treatment and criminal justice involvement for SSI recipients: Results from Washington State

American Journal on Addictions

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 370-379

  Luchansky, Bill ^a   Nordlund, Dan ^b   Estee, Sharon ^b   Lund, Peter ^a   Krupski, Antoinette ^c   Stark, Kenneth ^c  

^a Looking Glass Analytics   (United States)

^b Research and Data Analysis Division   (United States)

^c Washington State Division of Alcohol and Substance Abuse   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIME; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; DRUG ABUSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CRIME; CRIMINAL LAW; ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECURRENCE; RISK FACTORS; SOCIAL SECURITY; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; WASHINGTON;

EID: 33748527764     PISSN: 10550496     EISSN: 15210391     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10550490600860171     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Watkins K, Podus K, Lombardi E. The health and mental health of disabled substance abusers. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2001;28:205-211.
2. Grensenz CR, Watkins K, Podus D. Supplemental security income, disability insurance and substance abusers. Community Ment Health J. 1998;34:329-330.
3. McKay JR, McLellan TA, Durell J, Ruetsch C, Alterman AI. Characteristics of recipients of supplemental security income (SSI) benefits for drug addicts and alcoholics. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1998;185:290-298.
4. Anglin DM, Perrochet B. Drug use and crime: a historical review of research conducted by the UCLA Drug Abuse Research Center. Subst Use Misuse. 1998;33:1871-1914.
5. Hall W, Bell J, Carless J. Crime and drug use among applications for methadone maintenance. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1993;31:123-129.
6. Chaiken JM, Chaiken MR. Drugs and predatory crime. In: Tonry M, Wilson JQ, eds. Drugs and Crime. Vol. 23. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 1990:203-239.
7. National Institute of Justice. 2000 Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring: Annual Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice; 2001.
8. Gilson M, Kabel J. The Snohomish County Arrestee Substance Abuse Study. Olympia, Wash: Looking Glass Analytics, Inc.; 2003.
9. McLellan AT, Woody GE, Metzger D. Evaluating the effectiveness of addiction treatments: reasonable expectations, appropriate comparisons. Milbank Q. 1996;74:51-85.
10. Hser Y, Grella CE, Hubbard RL, et al. An evaluation of drug treatment for adolescents in four U.S. cities. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:689-695.
11. French MT, Salome HJ, Krupski A, et al. Benefit-cost analysis of residential and outpatient addiction treatment in the state of Washington. Eval Review. 2000;24:609-634.
12. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration (SAMHSA). Services Research Outcomes Study. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services; 2000.
13. Finigan M. Societal Outcomes and Cost Savings of Drug and Alcohol Treatment in the State of Oregon. Salem, Ore: Office of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Programs; 1996.
14. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2000: At a Glance (NCJ 183014). Washington, DC: Department of Justice; 2000.
15. Blumstein A, Beck AJ. Population Growth in U.S. Prisons, 1980-1996. In: Tonry M, Petersilia, eds. Prisons. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 2000:17-61.
16. Luchansky B, He L, Krupski A, Stark KD. Predicting readmission to substance abuse treatment using state information systems: the impact of client characteristics. J Subst Abuse. 2000;12:255-270.
17. Allison PD. Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1995.
18. Weisner C, Matzger H. A prospective study of the factors influencing entry to alcohol and drug treatment. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2002;29:126-137.