Assessment of urea degradation rate in model wine solutions by acid urease from Lactobacillus fermentum

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Volumn 54, Issue 17, 2006, Pages 6226-6235

  Fidaleo, Marcello ^a   Esti, Marco ^a   Moresi, Mauro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TUSCIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Acid urease; Composite design; Enzyme processing costs; Ethanol; Lactic and malic acids; Metabisulfite; Model wine solutions; pH; Pseudo first order kinetic constant rate; Specific activity; Urea degradation kinetics

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; DISULFITE; LACTIC ACID; MALIC ACID; MALIC ACID DERIVATIVE; SULFITE; UREA; UREASE;

ARTICLE; ENZYMOLOGY; KINETICS; LACTOBACILLUS FERMENTUM; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PH; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY; WINE;

ETHANOL; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; KINETICS; LACTIC ACID; LACTOBACILLUS FERMENTUM; MALATES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOLUTIONS; SULFITES; UREA; UREASE; WINE;

LACTOBACILLUS FERMENTUM;

EID: 33748518888     PISSN: 00218561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jf060934s     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ough, C. S.; Crowell, E. A.; Mooney, L. A. Formation of ethyl carbamate precursors during grape juice (Chardonnay) fermentation. I. Addition of amino acids, urea, and ammonia effects of fortification on intracellular and extracellular precursors. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1988, 39, 243-249.
2. Schlatter, J.; Lutz, W. K. The carcinogenic potential of ethyl carbamate (urethane): risk assessment at human dietary exposure levels. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1990, 28, 205-211.
3. Zimmerli, B.; Schlatter, J. Ethyl carbamate: analytical methodology, occurrence, formation, biological activity and risk assessment. Mutat. Res. 1991, 259, 325-350.
4. Bureau of Chemical Safety, Food Directorate Health Protection Branch, Health & Welfare Canada. Rationale for the Establishment of Guidelines To Limit Ethyl Carbamate Levels in Alcoholic Beverages; Ottawa, Canada, 1986; pp 1-9.
5. Canas, B. J. Formation and occurrence of ethyl carbamate in wine: a review. In Book of Abstracts, 213th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, San Francisco, CA, April 13-17, 1997; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1997; AGFD-045.
6. Tegmo-Larsson, I. M.; Henick-Kling, T. Ethyl carbamate precursors in grape juice and the efficiency of acid urease on their removal. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1990, 41 (3), 189-192.
7. Butzke, C. E.; Bisson, L. F. Ethyl Carbamate Preventative Action Manual; U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, 1997; published on line at http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~frf/ecaction.html.
8. Mira De Orduña, R.; Patchett, M. L.; Liu, S. Q; Pilone, G. J. Growth and arginine metabolism of the wine lactic acid bacteria Lactobacillus buchneri and Oenococcus oeni at different pH values and arginine concentrations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 1657-1662.
9. Monteiro, F.; Bisson, L. Utilization of arginine by yeast during grape juice fermentation and investigation of the possible role of arginine as a precursor of urea. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1992, 43, 18-22.
10. Stevens, D. F.; Ough, C. Ethyl carbamate formation - reaction of urea and citrulline with ethanol in wine under low to normal temperature conditions. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1993, 44, 309-312.
11. Kodama, S.; Yotsuzuka, F. Acid urease: reduction of ethyl carbamate formation in sherry under simulated baking conditions. J. Food Sci. 1996, 61 (2), 304-307.
12. Dixon, N. E.; Gazzola, C.; Blakeley, R. L.; Zerner, B. Jack bean urease (EC 3.5.1.5). A metalloenzyme. A simple biological role for nickel? J. Am. Chem. Soc 1975, 97, 4131-4133.
13. Moreau, M. C.; Ducluzeau, R.; Raibaud, P. Hydrolysis of urea in the gastrointestinal trace of "monoxenic" rats: effect of immunization with strains of ureolytic bacteria. Infect. Immun. 1976, 13, 9-15.
14. Suzuki, K.; Benno, Y.; Mitsuoka, S.; Takebe, S.; Kobashi, K.; Hase, J. Urease-producing species of intestinal anaerobes and their activities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1979, 37 (3), 379-382.
15. Takebe, S.; Kobashi, K. Acid urease from Lactobacillus of rat intestine. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1988, 36 (2), 693-699.
16. Matsumoto, K. Removal of urea from alcoholic beverages by immobilised acid urease. Bioprocess Technol. 1993, 16, 255-273.
17. Miyagawa, K.; Sumida, M.; Nakao, M.; Harada, M.; Yamamoto, H.; Kusumi, T.; Yoshizawa, K.; Amachi, T.; Nakayama, T. Purification, characterization, and application of an acid urease from Arthrobacter mobilis. J. Biotechnol. 1999, 68 (2, 3), 227-236.
18. Bertrand, A. Utilizzazione dell'ureasi nel vino. In Prodotti di Trattamento ed Ausiliari di Elaborazione del Mosti e dei Vini; Vivas, N., Ed.; Eno-one srl: Reggio Emilia, Italy, 2003; pp 171-192.
19. Fujinawa, S.; Burns, G.; De La Teja, P. Application of acid urease to reduction of urea in commercial wines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1990, 41 (4), 350-354.
20. Fujinawa, S.; Kodama, S.; Todoroki, H.; Suzuki, T. Trace urea determination in red wine and its degradation rate by acid urease. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1992, 43 (4), 362-366.
21. Fujinawa, S.; Todoroki, H.; Ohashi, N.; Toda, J.; Terasaki, M. Application of an acid urease to wine: determination of trace urea in wine. J. Food Sci. 1990, 55 (4), 1018-1022, 1038.
22. Ough, C. S.; Trioli, G. Urea removal from wine by an acid urease. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1988, 39 (4), 303-307.
23. Trioli, G.; Ough, C. S. Causes for inhibition of an acid urease from Lactobacillus fermentus. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1989, 40 (4), 245-252.
24. Famuyiwa, O.; Ough, C. Modification of acid urease activity by fluoride ions and malic acid in wines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1991, 42, 79-80.
25. Kodama, S. Optimal conditions for effective use of acid urease in wine. J. Food Sci. 1996, 61 (3), 548-552.
26. Seiichi, K.; Kiyoshi, I. Comparison of the rate of urea degradation by acid urease in European and American wine and the relationships between the degradation rate and the wine constituents. Nippon Jozo Kyokaishi 2001, 96 (2), 121-128.
27. Kodama, S.; Suzuki, T.; Fujinawa, S.; De La Teja, P.; Yotsuzuka, F. Urea contribution to ethyl carbamate formation in commercial wines during storage. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1994, 45 (1), 17-24.
28. Box, G. E. P.; Draper, N. R. Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces; Wiley: New York, 1987.
29. Qin, Y.; Cabral, J. M. S. Properties and application of urease. Biocatal. Biotransform. 2002, 20 (1), 1-14.
30. Moynihan, H. J.; Lee, C. K.; Clark, W.; Wang, N. H. L. Urea hydrolysis by immobilized urease in a fixed-bed reactor: analysis and kinetic parameter estimation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1989, 34, 951-963.
31. Tripton, K. F.; Dixon, H. B. F. Effects of pH on enzymes. Methods Enzymol. 1979, 63, 183-234.
32. Fidaleo, M.; Lavecchia, R. Kinetic study of enzymatic urea hydrolysis in the pH range 4-9. Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. 2003, 17 (4), 311-318.
33. Box, G. E. P.; Hunter, W. G.; Hunter, S. J. Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model-Building; Wiley: New York, 1978.
34. Himmelblau, D. M. Process Analysis by Statistical Methods; Wiley: New York, 1970; pp 158-166.