Intimate partner violence: Predictors of recidivism in a sample of arrestees

Violence Against Women

Volumn 12, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 917-935

  Kingsnorth, Rodney ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Intimate partner violence; Recidivism; Revictimization

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CRIMINOLOGY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; PARTNER VIOLENCE; PRISONER; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RECURRENT DISEASE; RISK FACTOR; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; VICTIM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CALIFORNIA; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CRIME VICTIMS; CRIMINAL PSYCHOLOGY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; PRISONERS; RECURRENCE; RISK FACTORS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SPOUSE ABUSE;

EID: 33748513839     PISSN: 10778012     EISSN: 15528448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077801206293081     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023-1053.
2. Binder, A., & Meeker, J. (1992). The development of social attitudes towards spousal abuse. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Domestic violence: The changing criminal justice response (pp. 3-19). Westport, CT: Auburn House.
3. Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (1996). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Cahn, N. R. (1992). Innovative approaches to the prosecution of domestic violence crimes: An overview. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Domestic violence: The changing criminal justice response (pp. 161-180). Westport, CT: Auburn House.
5. Chaudhuri, M., & Daly, K. (1992). Do restraining orders help? Battered women's experience with male violence and legal process. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Domestic violence: The changing criminal justice response (pp. 227-254). Westport, CT: Auburn House.
6. Corsilles, A. (1994). No-drop policies in the prosecution of domestic violence cases: Guarantee to action or dangerous solution. Fordham Law Review, 63, 853-881.
7. Davis, R. C., Smith, B. E., & Nickles, L. B. (1998). The deterrent effect of prosecuting domestic violence misdemeanors. Crime & Delinquency, 44, 434-442.
8. Davis, R. C., & Taylor, B. G. (1999). Does batterer treatment reduce violence? A synthesis of the literature. Women and Criminal Justice, 10, 69-93.
9. Dunford, F. W. (1992). The measurement of recidivism in cases of spousal assault. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 120-136.
10. Dunford, F. W. (2000). The San Diego Navy experiment: An assessment of intervention for men who assault their wives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 468-476.
11. Feder, L., & Dugan, L. (2002). A test of the efficacy of court-mandated counseling for domestic violence offenders: The Broward experiment. Justice Quarterly, 19, 343-375.
12. Feeley, M. (1979). The process is the punishment: Handling cases in a lower criminal court. New York: Russell Sage.
13. Fleury, R. E. (2002). Missing voices: Patterns of battered women's satisfaction with the criminal legal system. Violence Against Women, 8, 181-205.
14. Ford, D. A. (1991). Prosecution as a victim power resource: A note on empowering women in violent conjugal relationships. Law and Society Review, 25, 313-334.
15. Ford, D. A. (2003). Coercing victim participation in domestic violence prosecutions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 669-684.
16. Ford, D. A., & Regoli, M. J. (1992). The preventive impacts of policies for prosecuting wife batterers. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Domestic violence: The changing criminal justice response (pp. 181-207). Westport, CT: Auburn House.
17. Gondolf, E. W. (2002). Batterer intervention systems: Issues, outcomes, and recommendations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Hanna, C. (1996). No right to choose: Mandated victim participation in domestic violence prosecutions. Harvard Law Review, 109, 1849-1910.
19. Harrell, A., & Smith, B. E. (1996). Effects of restraining orders on domestic violence victims. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Do arrests and restraining orders work? (pp. 214-242). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Hirschel, D., & Hutchison, I. W. (2003). The voices of domestic violence victims: Predictors of victim preference for arrest and the relationship between preference for arrest and revictimization. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 313-336.
21. Maxwell, C. D., Garner, J. H., & Fagan, J. A. (2001). The effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: New evidence from the spousal assault replication program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
22. Mills, L. (1998). Mandatory arrest and prosecution policies for domestic violence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 306-318.
23. Rebovich, D. J. (1996). Prosecution response to domestic violence: Results of a survey of large jurisdictions. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Do arrests and restraining orders work? (pp. 176-191). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Schmidt, J. D., & Sherman, L. W. (1996). Does arrest deter domestic violence. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Do arrests and restraining orders work? (pp. 176-191). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Sherman, L. W. (2003). Misleading evidence and evidence-led policy: Making social science more experimental. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 589, 6-19.
26. Sherman, L. W., & Berk, R. S. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 4, 261-272.
27. Sherman, L. W., Smith, D. A., Schmidt, J. D., & Rogan, D. P. (1992). Crime, punishment, and stake in conformity: Legal and informal control of domestic violence. American Sociological Review, 57, 680-690.
28. Smith, B. E., Davis, R., Nickles, L. B., & Davies, H. J. (2001). An evaluation of efforts to implement no-drop policies: Two central values in conflict. Final report. Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
29. Taylor, B. G., Davis, R. C., & Maxwell, C. D. (2001). The effects of a group batterer treatment program: A randomized experiment in Brooklyn. Justice Quarterly, 18, 171-202.
30. Thistlethwaite, A., Woolredge, J., & Gibbs, D. (1998). Severity of dispositions and domestic violence recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 44, 388-398.
31. Tolman, R. M., & Weisz, A. (1995). Coordinated community intervention for domestic violence: The effects of arrest and prosecution on recidivism of woman abuse perpetrators. Crime & Delinquency, 41, 481-495.
32. U.S. Government, Bureau of the Census. (2000). American Fast Finder. Retrieved August 8, 2006, from http://www.census.gov
33. Woolredge, J., & Thistlethwaite, A. (2002). Reconsidering domestic violence recidivism: Conditioned effects of legal controls by individual and aggregate levels of stake in conformity. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 45-70.
34. Woolredge, J., & Thistlethwaite, A. (2005). Court dispositions and rearrest for intimate assault. Crime & Delinquency, 51, 75-102.
35. Zorza, J. (1992). Symposium on domestic violence: The criminal law of misdemeanor domestic violence, 1970-1990. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 46-72.