THREE THEMES ON FIELD EXPERIMENTS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Research in Experimental Economics

Volumn 10, Issue , 2004, Pages 71-123

  Camilo Cardenas, Juan ^a   Carpenter, Jeffrey P ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748510375     PISSN: 01932306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0193-2306(04)10004-5     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Ashraf, N., Bohnet, I., & Piankov, N. (2003). Decomposing trust. JFK School Working Paper. http://ksghome.harvard.edu/∼.ibohnet.academic.ksg/papers.html.
2. Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
3. Bardhan, P. & Udry, C. (1999). Development microeconomics. Oxford and New York, vi, 242.
4. Barr, A. (2003). The potential benefits of an experimental approach. Center for the Study of African Economies Working Paper.
5. Barr, A., & Truman, P. (2000). Revealed and concealed preferences in the Chilean pension system: An experimental investigation. University of Oxford Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series. http://www.economics.ox.ac.uk/research/WP/PDF/paper053.pdf.
6. Berg J., Dickaut J., and McCabe K. Trust, reciprocity and social history. Games and Economic Behavior 10 (1995) 122-142
7. Binswanger H. Attitudes toward risk: Experimental measurement in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62 (1980) 395-407
8. Botelho, A., Harrison, G., Hirsch, M., & Rutström, E. (2002). Bargaining behavior, demographics and nationality: What can the experimental evidence show? In: J. Carpenter, G. Harrison & J. List (Eds), Field Experiments in Economics. Greenwich, CN and London: JAI Press.
9. Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments on strategic interaction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
10. Camerer, C., & Fehr, E. (2004). Measuring social norms and preferences using experimental games: A guide for social scientists. In: J. Henrich, R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C. Camerer, E. Fehr & H. Gintis (Eds), Foundations of Human Sociality: Experimental and Ethnographic Evidence from 15 Small-Scale Societies. Oxford University Press.
11. Cardenas, J. C. (2003a). Bringing the lab to the field: More than changing subjects. Department of Economics, CEDE, Universidad de Los Andes. Working Paper. http://www.economia.uniandes.edu.co/∼economia/archivos/temporal/Cardenas%20MoreThanChangingSubjects.pdf.
12. Cardenas J.C. Real wealth and experimental cooperation: Evidence from field experiments. Journal of Development Economics 70 (2003) 263-289
13. Cardenas, J. C., & Carpenter, J. (2002). Using cross-cultural experiments to understand the dynamics of a global commons. Middlebury College Center for International Affairs Working Paper 2.
14. Cardenas, J. C., & Carpenter, J. (2003). Pro-social behavior in the global commons: A north-south experiment. Middlebury College, Department of Economics Working Paper. http://community.middlebury.edu/∼jcarpent/papers.html.
15. Cardenas, J. C., & Carpenter, J. (2004). Experimental development economics: A review of the literature and ideas for future research. Middlebury College, Department of Economics Working Paper. http://community.middlebury.edu/∼jcarpent/papers.html.
16. Carpenter, J. (2002). Measuring social capital: Adding field experimental methods to the analytical toolbox. In: J. Isham, T. Kelly & S. Ramaswamy (Eds), Social Capital and Economic Development: Well-Being in Developing Countries (pp. 119-137). Northampton: Edward Elgar.
17. Carpenter J., Daniere A., and Takahashi L. Cooperation, trust, and social capital in southeast Asian urban slums. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 55 4 (2004, December) 533-551
18. Carter, M., & Castillo, M. (2002). The economic impacts of altruism, trust and reciprocity: An experimental approach to social capital. AAE Staff Papers, University of Wisconsin-Madison. http://www.aae.wisc.edu/www/pub/sps/stpap448.html, mimeo.
19. Croson R., and Buchan N. Gender and culture: International experimental evidence from trust games. American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 89 (1999) 386-391
20. Desdoigts A. Patterns of economic development and the formation of clubs. Journal of Economic Growth 4 (1999) 305-330
21. Duflo, E. (2003). Poor but rational. Department of Economics, MIT, working paper. http://econ-www.mit.edu/faculty/download_pdf.php?id=516.
22. Durlauf S.N. Bowling alone: A review essay. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 47 (2002) 259-273
23. Durlauf S.N. On the empirics of social capital. The Economic Journal 112 (2002) 459-479
24. Eckel C., and Grossman P. Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games and Economic Behavior 16 (1996) 181-191
25. Fershtman C., and Gneezy U. Discrimination in a segmented society: An experimental approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2001) 351-377
26. Forsythe R., Horowitz J., Savin N.E., and Sefton M. Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior 6 (1994) 347-369
27. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
28. Harrison, G. (forthcoming). Experimental evidence on alternative environmental valuation methods. Environmental & Resource Economics, 23.
29. Harrison G.W., Lau M.I., and Williams M.B. Estimating individual discount rates in Denmark: A field experiment. American Economic Review 92 (2002) 1606-1617
30. Henrich J., Boyd R., Bowles S., Camerer C., Fehr E., Gintis H., and McElreath R. In search of homo economics: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. American Economic Review 91 (2001) 73-78
31. Hoff, K., & Pandey, P. (2003). Why are social inequalities so durable? An experimental test of the effects of Indian caste on performance. World Bank Working Paper.
32. Hoff, K., & Stiglitz, J. (2001). Modern economic theory and development. In: G. Meier, & J. Stiglitz (Eds), Frontiers of Development Economics (pp. 389-459). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Hoffman E., McCabe K., Shachat J., and Smith V. Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior 7 (1994) 346-380
34. Kahneman D., and Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist 39 (1984) 341-350
35. Karlan, D. (2002). Using experimental economics to measure social capital and predict financial decisions. http://www.wws.princeton.edu/∼dkarlan/downloads/gamespaper.pdf.
36. Kinder, D. R., & Palfrey, T. R. (1993). On behalf of an experimental political science. In: D. R. Kinder & T. R. Palfrey (Eds), Experimental Foundations of Political Science (pp. 1-39). Ann Arbor: University Of Michigan Press.
37. Kirby K., Godoy R., Reyes-Garcia V., Byron E., Apaza L., Leonard W., Perez E., Vadez V., and Wilkie D. Correlates of delay-discount rates: Evidence from Tsimane Amerindians of the Bolivian rain forest. Journal of Economic Psychology 23 (2002) 291-316
38. Knack S., and Keefer P. Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (1997) 1251-1288
39. List J., and Lucking-Reiley D. Bidding behavior and decision costs in field experiments. Economic Inquiry 40 (2002) 611-619
40. Macpherson D., and Hirsch B. Wages and gender composition: Why do women's jobs pay less?. Journal of Labor Economics 13 (1995) 426-471
41. Manski C. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies 60 (1993) 531-542
42. Manski C. Economic analysis of social interactions. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (2000) 115-136
43. McCabe, K. (2003). Reciprocity and social order: What do experiments tell us about the failure of economic growth? Mercatus Center Working Paper, George Mason University. http://www.mercatus.org/socialchange/article.php/274.html.
44. Narayan D., and Pritchett L. Cents and sociability: Household income and social capital in rural Tanzania. Economic Development and Cultural Change 47 (1999) 871-897
45. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
46. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
47. Plott, C. (1987). Dimensions of parallelism: Some policy applications of experimental methods. In: A. Roth (Ed.), Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: Six Points of View (pp. 193-219). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
49. Rao, V., & Walton, M. (2004). Culture and public action: A cross-disciplinary dialogue on development policy. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
50. Ray, D. (1998). Development economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
51. Ray D. What's new in development economics. American Economist 44 (2000) 3-16
52. Roth A. The economist as engineer: Game theory, experimentation, and computation as tools for design economics. Econometrica 70 (2002) 1341-1376
53. Roth A., Prasnikar V., Okuno-Fujiwara M., and Zamir S. Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh and Tokyo: An experimental study. American Economic Review 81 (1991) 1068-1095
54. Smith V. Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. American Economic Review 72 (1982) 923-955
55. Smith V.L., and Walker J.M. Monetary rewards and decision cost in experimental economics. Economic Inquiry 31 (1993) 245-261
56. Tanaka, T. (2003). Land consolidation problem: Experimental approach. Department of Economics, University of Hawaii Working Paper.
57. Wooldridge, J. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.