Translational and rotational motion of probes in supercooled 1,3,5-tris(naphthyl)benzene

Journal of Physical Chemistry

Volumn 100, Issue 46, 1996, Pages 18249-18257

  Blackburn, F R ^a   Wang, Chia Ying ^a   Ediger, M D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748506082     PISSN: 00223654     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp9622041     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Kauzmann, W. Chem. Rev. 1948, 43, 219.
2. Ediger, M. D.; Ansell, C. A.; Nagel, S. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 13200.
3. Debye, P. Polar Molecules; Dover: New York, 1929; pp 72-85.
4. Einstein, A. Investigations on the Theory of Brownian Motion; Dover: New York, 1956.
5. See for example: Ravi, R.; Ben-Amotz, D. Chem. Phys. 1994, 183, 385;
6. Artaki, I.; Jonas, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 3360.
7. Bauer, D. R.; Alms, G. R.; Brauman, J. I.; Pecora, R. J. Chem. Phys. Ibid. 1974, 61, 2255.
8. Chuang, J.; Eisenthal, K. B. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1971, 11, 368.
9. Paul, E.; Mazo, R. M. J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 48, 1405.
10. Fujara, F.; Geil, B.; Sillescu, H.; Fleischer, G. Z. Phys. B. 1992, 88, 195.
11. Cicerone, M. T.; Ediger, M. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 104, 7210.
12. Cicerone, M. T.; Blackburn, F. R.; Ediger, M. D. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 8224.
13. Hwang, Y.; Ediger, M. D. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed., in press.
14. Chang, I.; Fujara, F.; Geil, B.; Heuberger, G.; Mangel, T.; Sillescu, H. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1994, 172-174, 248.
15. MaGill, J. H.; Ubbelohde, A. R. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1958, 54, 1811.
16. MaGill, J. H.; Plazek, D. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1967, 46 (10), 3757.
17. Plazek, D. J.; MaGill, J. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1966, 45 (8), 3038.
18. MaGill, J. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1967, 47 (8), 2802.
19. Plazek, D. J.; MaGill, J. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 49 (8), 3678.
20. Zemke, K.; Schmidt-Rohr, K.; MaGill, J. H.; Sillescu, H.; Spiess, H. W. Mol. Phys. 1993, 80 (6), 1317. On the basis of the work of Whitaker and McMahon (ref 22), we presume that the isomer used in this work was ααβ-TNB and not ααα-TNB.
21. Zhu, X. R.; Wang, C. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 84 (11), 6086.
22. Ma, R. J.; He, T. J.; Wang, C. H. J. Chem. Phys., 1988, 88 (30), 1497.
23. Ehlich, D.; Sillescu, H. Macromolecules 1990, 23 (6), 1600.
24. Fujara, F.; Petry, W. Europhys. Lett. 1987, 4 (8), 921.
25. Bartsch, E.; Debus, O.; Fujara, F.; Kiebel, M.; Petry, W.; Sillescu, H.; MaGill, J. H. Physica B 1992, 180&181, 808.
26. Whitaker, C. M.; McMahon, R. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 1081.
27. 13C NMR measurements on the heat-treated samples confirmed that no chemical reaction had taken place; that is, only the ααβ isomer was present.
28. The melting curve for TNB was qualitatively different than those obtained for indium and zinc standards. The onset of melting for TNB was very gradual, covering a temperature range of about 15 K before the heat flow began to rise sharply.
29. Waldow, D. A.; Ediger, M. D.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Matsushita, Y.; Noda, I. Macromolecules 1990, 24, 3147.
30. Cicerone, M. T.; Ediger, M. D. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 10489.
31. O'Conner, D. V.; Phillips, D. Time-Correlated Single Photon Counting, (Academic Press: London, 1984.
32. Davoust, J.; Devaux, P. F.; Leger, L. J. EMBO 1982, 1, 1233.
33. See section on reversible photobleaching for a slight qualification of these statements.
34. Eichler, H. J.; Gunter, P.; Pohl, D. W. Laser-Induced Dynamic Gratings, Springer: Berlin, 1986.
35. In some instances, the decay of c(t) was biexponential because of sample degradation (see sample degradation section).
36. T at constant temperature for three angles, including 180°. 1.72 is close to the estimated value of 1.59 used in ref 19. See: Ehlich, D. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Mainz, Germany.
37. An initial anisotropy of 0.3 was observed in the TCSPC experiment on the neat TNB sample provided by MaGill.
38. This equation partially accounts for residual bleaching (see ref 26).
39. Williams, G.; Hains, P. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1971, 10, 585;
40. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Symp. 1972, 6, 14.
41. Cicerone, M. T.; Blackburn, F. R.; Ediger, M. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 102, 471.
42. The choice of 5 nm here is based on a rough estimate of this length scale in OTP. See refs 36 and 43.
43. Tarjus, G.; Kivelson, D. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 3071.
44. Perera, D. N.; Harrowell, P. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 104, 2369.
45. Liu, C. Z.-W.; Oppenheim, I. Phys. Rev. E 1996, 53, 799.
46. Stillinger, F. H.; Hodgdon, J. A. Phys. Rev. E 1994, 50, 2064.
47. Schnauss, W.; Fujara, F.; Sillescu, H. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97 (2), 1378.
48. Cicerone, M. T.; Ediger, M. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 5684.
49. Bohmer, R.; Hinze, G.; Diezemann, G.; Geil, B.; Sillescu, H. Europhys. Lett. submitted.
50. Schiener, B.; Loidl, A.; Böhmer, R.; Chamberlin, R. V. Preprint.
51. Heuer, A.; Wilhelm, M.; Zimmermann, H.; Spiess, H. W. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 75, 2851.
52. Zwanzig, R. Chem. Phys Lett. 1989, 639, 164.
53. Li, K.-L.; Jones, A. A.; Inglefield, P. T.; English, A. D. Macromolecules 1989, 22, 4198.
54. Riehert, R. Macromolecules 1988, 21, 923.
55. Eisenbach, C. D. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 1980, 84, 680.
56. Paik, C. S.; Morawetz, H. Macromolecules 1972, 5, 171.