Comparing pitch spelling algorithms

ISMIR 2005 - 6th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 280-287

  Meredith, David ^a   Wiggins, Geraint A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Algorithms; Evaluation; Pitch spelling; Transcription

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION; ONSET-TIME; PITCH SPELLING; PITCH SPELLING ALGORITHMS; STANDARD DEVIATION;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; TRANSCRIPTION;

ALGORITHMS;

EID: 33748496003     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. S. A. Abdallah and M. D. Plumbley. Polyphonic transcription by non-negative sparse coding of power spectra. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR 2004), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain, 2004.
2. E. Cambouropoulos, M. Crochemore, C. S. Iliopoulos, L. Mouchard, and Y. J. Pinzon. Computing approximate repetitions in musical sequences. International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 79(11):1135-1148, 2002.
3. E. Cambouropoulos. A general pitch interval representation: Theory and applications. Journal of New Music Research, 25(3):231-251, 1996.
4. E. Cambouropoulos. Automatic pitch spelling: From numbers to sharps and flats. In VIII Brazilian Symposium on Computer Music (SBC&M 2001), Fortaleza, Brazil, 2001.
5. E. Cambouropoulos. Pitch spelling: A computational model. Music Perception, 20(4):411-429, 2003.
6. E. Chew and Y.-C. Chen. Determining context-defining windows: Pitch spelling using the spiral array. In Fourth International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR 2003) (October 26-30), Baltimore, MD., 2003.
7. E. Chew and Y.-C. Chen. Real-time pitch spelling using the Spiral Array. Computer Music Journal, 29(2):61-76, 2005.
8. E. Chew. Towards a Mathematical Model of Tonality. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA., 2000.
9. Z. Galil. On improving the worst case running time of the Boyer-Moore string matching algorithm. Communications of the ACM, 22(9):505-508, 1979.
10. D. E. Knuth, J. H. Morris, and V. R. Pratt. Fast pattern matching in strings. SIAM Journal on Computing, 6: 323-350, 1977.
11. C. L. Krumhansl. Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch, volume 17 of Oxford Psychology Series. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford, 1990.
12. H. C. Longuet-Higgins. The perception of melodies. In H. C. Longuet-Higgins, editor, Mental Processes: Studies in Cognitive Science, pages 105-129. British Psychological Society/MIT Press, London, England and Cambridge, Mass., 1987.
13. Q. McNemar. Psychological Statistics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 4th edition, 1969.
14. D. Meredith, K. Lemström, and G. A. Wiggins. Algorithms for discovering repeated patterns in multidimensional representations of polyphonic music. Journal of New Music Research, 31(4):321-345, 2002.
15. D. Meredith. Pitch spelling algorithms. In R. Kopiez, A. C. Lehmann, I. Wolther, and C. Wolf, editors, Proceedings of the Fifth Triennial ESCOM Conference (ESCOM5) (8-13 September 2003), pages pp. 204-207, Hanover University of Music and Drama, Hanover, Germany, 2003.
16. D. Meredith. Comparing pitch spelling algorithms on a large corpus of tonal music. In U. K. Wiil, editor, Computer Music Modeling and Retrieval, Second International Symposium, CMMR 2004, Esbjerg, Denmark, May 26-29, 2004, Revised Papers, volume 3310 of LNCS, pages 173-192, Berlin, 2005. Springer.
17. J. Stoddard, C. Raphael, and P. E. Utgoff. Well-tempered spelling: A key-invariant pitch spelling algorithm. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR 2004) (October 10-14), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain, 2004.
18. D. Temperley. The Cognition of Basic Musical Structures. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001.