Hispanic concentration and the conditional influence of collective efficacy on adolescent childbearing

Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine

Volumn 160, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 925-930

  Way, Sandra ^a   Finch, Brian K ^b   Cohen, Deborah ^c  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT PREGNANCY; ARTICLE; BIRTH RATE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HISPANIC; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MARRIAGE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIOECONOMICS;

ADOLESCENT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HUMANS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; LOS ANGELES; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY IN ADOLESCENCE; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 33748489352     PISSN: 10724710     EISSN: 10724710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.160.9.925     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Diez Roux AV. Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:1783-1789.
2. Robert S. Socioeconomic position and health: the independent contribution of community socioeconomic context. Annu Rev Sociol. 1999;25:489-516.
3. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science. 1997;277:918-924.
4. Cagney KA, Browning CR. Exploring neighborhood-level variation in asthma and other respiratory diseases. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:229-236.
5. Cohen DA, Farley TA, Mason K. Why is poverty unhealthy? social and physical mediators. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:1631-1641.
6. Browning CR, Cagney KA. Moving beyond poverty: neighborhood structure, social processes, and health. J Health Soc Behav. 2003;44:552-571.
7. Browning CR, Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J. Neighborhood context and racial differences in early adolescent sexual activity. Demography. 2004;41:697-720.
8. Klepinger DH, Lundberg S, Plotnick RD. Adolescent fertility and the education attainment of young women. Fam Plann Perspect. 1995;27:23-28.
9. Hayes CD. Risking the Future. Vol 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1987.
10. Haveman R, Wolfe B, Wilson K. Childhood poverty and adolescent schooling and fertility outcomes: reduced-form and structural estimates. In: Duncan GJ, Brooks-Gunn J, eds. Consequences of Growing Up Poor. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation; 1997:419-460.
11. Maynard RA, ed. Kids Having Kids: Economic Costs and Social Consequences of Teen Pregnancy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press; 1997.
12. Luker K. Dubious Conceptions: The Politics of Teenage Pregnancy. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1996.
13. Lawlor DA, Shaw M. Too much too young? teenage pregnancy is not a public health problem. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:552-554.
14. Scally G. Too much too young? teenage pregnancy is a public health, not a clinical, problem. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:554-555.
15. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Munson ML. Births: Final Data for 2003. Hyattsville, Md: National Center for Health Statistics; 2005. National Vital Statistics Reports, No. 2. http://www.cdc.gov/ nchs/data/nvsr54 /nvsr54_02.pdf. Accessed December 6, 2005.
16. South SJ, Crowder KD. Neighborhood effects on family formation: concentrated poverty and beyond. Am Soc Rev. 1999;64:113-132.
17. Moore KA, Simms MC, Betsey CL. Choice and Circumstance: Racial Differences in Adolescent Sexuality and Fertility. New Brunswick, Conn: Transaction Books; 1986.
18. St. John C, Rowe D. Adolescent background and fertility norms: implications for racial differences in early childbearing. Soc Sci Q. 1990;71:152-162.
19. Driscoll AK, Biggs MA, Brindis CD, Yankah E. Adolescent Latino reproductive health: a review of the literature. Hisp J Behav Sci. 2001;23:255-326.
20. United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects: The 2004 Revision. New York, NY: United Nations Division of Economics and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2005.
21. Marcum JP. Comment on "Untangling structural and normative aspects of the minority status-fertility hypothesis" by Lopez and Sabagh. Am J Sociol. 1980;86:377-382.
22. Aneshensel CS, Fielder EP, Becerra RM. Fertility and fertility-related behavior among Mexican-American and non-Hispanic white female adolescents. J Health Soc Behav. 1989;30:56-76.
23. Deitrich LC. Chicana Adolescents; Bitches, 'Hos's' and Schoolgirls. Westport, Conn: Praeger Publishers; 1998.
24. Erickson P. Latina Adolescent Childbearing in East Los Angeles. Austin: University of Texas Press; 1998.
25. Marin G, Sabogal F, Marin BV, Otero-Sabogal R, Perez-Stable EJ. Development of a short acculturation scale for Hispanics. Hisp J Behav Sci. 1987;9:182-205.
26. Frank R, Heuveline P. A crossover in Mexican and Mexican-American fertility rates: evidence and explanations for an emerging paradox. Demogr Res. 2005;12:78-101.
27. Vega W. Hispanic families in the 1980's: a decade of research. J Marriage Fam. 1990;52:1015-1024.
28. Sastry N, Ghosh-Dastider B, Adams J, Pebley A. The Design of a Multilevel Longitudinal Survey of Children, Families, and Communities: The Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey. Santa Monica, Calif: RAND Corp; 2000. Labor and Population Program, Working Paper 00-18.
29. Browning CR, Feinberg SL, Dietz RD. The paradox of social organization: networks, collective efficacy, and violent crime in urban neighborhoods. Soc Forces. 2004;83:503-534.
30. Ricketts R, Sawhill IV. Defining and measuring the underclass. J Policy Anal Manage. 1988;7:316-325.
31. Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1991.
32. Geronimus AT. Damned if you do: culture, identity, privilege, and teenage childbearing in the United States. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:881-893.
33. Geronimus AT. The weathering hypothesis and the health of African American women and infants. Ethn Dis. 1992;2:207-221.
34. Stack CB. All Our Kin. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1974.