Phenyl tris(3-tert-butylpyrazolyl)borato complexes of lithium and thallium, [PhTpBut]M (M = Li, Tl): A novel structure for a monomeric tris(pyrazolyl)boratothallium complex and a study of its stereochemical nonrigidity by 1H and 205Tl NMR spectroscopy

Journal of the Chemical Society - Dalton Transactions

Volumn , Issue 12, 1999, Pages 1929-1935

  Kisko, Jennifer L ^a   Hascall, Tony ^a   Kimblin, Clare ^a   Parkin, Gerard ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748484249     PISSN: 03009246     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/a901875a     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. For recent reviews, see: (a) S. Trofimenko, Chem. Rev., 1993, 93, 943;
2. (b) G. Parkin, Adv. Inorg. Chem., 1995, 42, 291;
3. (c) N. Kitajima and W. B. Tolman, Prog. Inorg. Chem., 1995, 43, 419;
4. (d) I. Santos and N. Marques, New. J. Chem., 1995, 19, 551;
5. (e) D. L. Reger, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1996, 147, 571;
6. (f) M. Etienne, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1997, 156, 201;
7. (g) P. K. Byers, A. J. Canty and R. T. Honeyman, Adv. Organomet. Chem., 1992, 34, 1.
8. RR′] complexes, see: (a) C. Janiak, Main Group Met. Chem., 1998, 21, 33;
9. (b) C. Janiak, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1997, 163, 107.
10. The abbreviations adopted here for tris(pyrazolyl)hydroborato ligands are based on those described by Trofimenko [ref. 1(a)]. Thus, the tris(pyrazolyl)hydroborato ligands are represented by the abbreviation Tp, with the 3- and 5-alkyl substituents listed respectively as superscripts. If the fourth substituent on boron is anything other than hydrogen, the substituent is listed as a prefix, e.g., [pzTp] and [RTp].
11. See, for example: J. L. Kisko, T. Hascall and G. Parkin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 10561.
12. S. Trofimenko, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1967, 89, 6288.
13. K. Nidenzu and S. Trofimenko, Top. Curr. Chem., 1986, 131, 1.
14. 2 with Napz in the presence of pzH. (a) D. L. Reger and M. E. Tarquini, Inorg. Chem., 1982, 21, 840;
15. (b) ref. 5;
16. (c) D. L. White and J. W. Faller, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1982, 104, 1548.
17. 3] with pyrazole. See: F. A. Cotton, C. A. Murillo and B. R. Stults, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1977, 22, 75.
18. 2 with excess pyrazole. See ref. 5.
19. 3N. Subsequent reaction of [FcTp]H with TlOEt gives the thallium complex Tl[FcTp]. F. Jäkle, K. Polborn and M. Wagner, Chem. Ber., 1996, 129, 603.
20. U. E. Bucher, T. F. Fässler, M. Hunziker, R. Nesper, H. Rüegger and L. M. Venanzi, Gazz. Chim. Ital., 1995, 125, 181.
21. For example, terminal alkyl, hydride, hydroxide and chalcogenide moieties have been stabilized with such ligation. See, for example, ref. 1(b) and (a) M. C. Kuchta and G. Parkin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 12651;
22. (b) M. C. Kuchta and G. Parkin, Inorg. Chem., 1997, 36, 2492;
23. (c) M. C. Kuchta and G. Parkin, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1998, 2279.
24. B. Singaram, T. E. Cole and H. C. Brown, Organometallics, 1984, 3, 774.
25. ButpzH) may be isolated. J. L. Kisko and G. Parkin, unpublished work.
26. (a) S. Trofimenko, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1967, 89, 3170;
27. (b) R. A. Kresinski, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1999, 401.
28. C. López, R. M. Claramunt, C. Foces-Foces, F. H. Cano and J. Elguero, Rev. Roum. Chim., 1994, 9, 795.
29. RR′]H derivatives have also been prepared by this method. See: J. Blackwell, C. Lehr, Y. Sun, W. E. Piers, S. D. Pearce-Batchilder, M. J. Zaworotko and V. G. Young, Jr., Can J. Chem., 1997, 75, 702 and footnote 5 therein.
30. RR′]M derivatives, see, for example: (a) C. M. Dowling, D. Leslie, M. H. Chisholm and G. Parkin, Main Group Chem., 1995, 1, 29;
31. (b) C. Lopez, R. M. Claramunt, D. Sanz, C. Foces Foces, F. H. Cano, E. Faure, E. Cayon and J. Elguero, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1990, 176, 195;
32. (c) G. G. Lobbia, P. Cecchi, R. Spagna, M. Colapietro, A. Pifferi and C. Pettinari, J. Organomet. Chem., 1995, 485, 45;
33. (d) K. Weis and H. Vahrenkamp, Inorg. Chem., 1997, 36, 5589;
34. (e) H. V. R. Dias and H.-J. Kim, Organometallics, 1996, 15, 5374;
35. (f) H. V. R. Dias, W. C. Jin, H. J. Kim and H.-L. Lu, Inorg. Chem., 1996, 35, 2317;
36. (g) H. V. R. Dias, H.-L. Lu, R. E. Ratcliff and S. G. Bott, Inorg. Chem., 1995, 34, 1975.
37. Although three coordination of lithium is less common than its ubiquitous tetrahedral coordination, it is nevertheless well precedented. For example, ca. 20% of the lithium complexes listed in the Cambridge Structural Database have a coordination number of three for lithium.
38. CSD Version 5.16, 1999, 3D Search and Research Using the Cambridge Structural Database, F. H. Allen and O. Kennard, Chem. Des. Automat. News, 1993, 8, pp. 1, 31-37.
39. D. L. Reger, J. E. Collins, M. A. Matthews, A. L. Rheingold, L. M. Liable-Sands and I. A. Guzei, Inorg. Chem., 1997, 36, 6266.
40. D. C. Bradley, M. B. Hursthouse, J. Newton and N. P. C. Walker, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1984, 188.
41. For a compilation of data, see: R. Han, P. Ghosh, P. J. Desrosiers, S. Trofimenko and G. Parkin, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1997, 3713.
42. A. H. Cowley, R. L. Geerts, C. M. Nunn and S. Trofimenko, J. Organomet. Chem., 1989, 365, 19.
43. For other examples in which intraligand interactions influence the binding mode of poly(pyrazolyl)borate complexes, see: (a) Y. Sohrin, H. Kokusen and M. Matsui, Inorg. Chem., 1995, 34, 3928;
44. (b) D. L. Reger, M. F. Huff, A. L. Rheingold and B. S. Haggerty, Inorg. Chem., 1992, 114, 579;
45. (c) F. A. Cotton, B. A. Frenz and C. A. Murillo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1975, 97, 2118.
46. (a) C. Dowling, P. Ghosh and G. Parkin, Polyhedron, 1997, 16, 3469;
47. (b) T. Fillebeen, T. Hascall and G. Parkin, Inorg. Chem., 1997, 36, 3787;
48. (c) P. Ghosh, T. Hascall, C. Dowling and G. Parkin, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1998, 3355.
49. For example, only 7% of the structurally characterized lithium complexes listed in the Cambridge Structural Database are two coordinate.
50. RR′]Tl complexes. See, for example: (a) G. Ferguson, M. C. Jennings, F. J. Lalor and C. Shanahan, Acta. Crystallogr., Sect. C, 1991, 47, 2079;
51. (b) A. L. Rheingold, L. M. Liable-Sands and S. Trofimenko, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1997, 1691;
52. (c) C. Janiak, S. Temizdemir and T. G. Scharmann, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 1998, 624, 755.
53. 205Tl NMR spectroscopic signals (2:2.6 at -70°C). In view of the potentially different relaxation times for the different thallium nuclei, the integral ratio is not expected to be an accurate measure of their relative concentrations.
54. 2:1 could correspond to the equatorial isomer of Scenario I.
55. U. E. Bucher, A. Currao, R. Nesper, H. Rüegger, L. M. Venanzi and E. Younger, Inorg. Chem., 1995, 34, 66.
56. W. D. Jones and E. T. Hessell, Inorg. Chem., 1991, 30, 778.
57. (a) J. P. McNally, V. S. Leong and N. J. Cooper, in Experimental Organometallic Chemistry, ed. A. L. Wayda and M. Y. Darensbourg, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1987, ch. 2, pp. 6-23;
58. (b) B. J. Burger and J. E. Bercaw, in Experimental Organometallic Chemistry, eds. A. L. Wayda and M. Y. Darensbourg, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1987, ch. 4, pp. 79-98;
59. (c) D. F. Shriver and M. A. Drezdzon, The Manipulation of Air-Sensitive Compounds, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2nd edn., 1986.
60. J. J. Dechter and J. I. Zink, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1975, 97, 2937.
61. 2O (1.0, 0.5 and 0.25 M) were extrapolated to zero concentration.
62. G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXTL, An Integrated System for Solving, Refining and Displaying Crystal Structures from Diffraction Data, University of Göttingen, 1981.