Comparison of wire loop and shear blade as the 2 most common methods for testing orthodontic shear bond strength

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 130, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 385-387

  Mojtahedzadeh, Faramarz ^a   Akhoundi, Mohammad Sadegh Ahmad ^b   Noroozi, Hassan ^c  

^a KERMAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c Dental Research Center TUMS   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN CEMENT; TRANSBOND XT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; EQUIPMENT; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SHEAR STRENGTH; STANDARD;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESIN CEMENTS; SHEAR STRENGTH;

EID: 33748460089     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.03.021     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bishara S.E., Oonsombat C., Soliman M.M., Ajlouni R., and Laffoon J.F. The effect of tooth bleaching on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128 (2005) 755-760
2. Vicente A., Bravo L.A., Romero M., Ortiz A.J., and Canteras M. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching primers. Am J Dent 18 (2005) 256-260
3. Krug A.Y., and Conley R.S. Shear bond strengths using an indirect technique with different light sources. J Clin Orthod 39 (2005) 485-487
4. Bishara S.E., Soliman M., Laffoon J., and Warren J.J. Effect of antimicrobial monomer-containing adhesive on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 75 (2005) 397-399
5. Brantley W.A., and Eliades T. Orthodontic materials, scientific and clinical aspects. 1st ed. (2001), Thieme, Stuttgart
6. Fox N.A., McCabe J.F., and Buckley J.G. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 21 (1994) 33-43
7. Rueggeberg F.A. Substrate for adhesion testing to tooth structure-review of the literature. Dent Mater 7 (1990) 2-10
8. International Standardization Organization. Technical Report TR 11405. Dental materials: guidance on testing of adhesion to tooth structure (1994)
9. Eliades T., and Brantley W.A. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. Eur J Orthod 22 (2000) 13-23
10. Eliades T., Viazis A.D., and Eliades G. Bonding of ceramic brackets to enamel: morphologic and structural considerations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 99 (1991) 369-375
11. Kao E., Eliades T., Rezvan E., and Johnston W.M. Torsional bond strength and failure pattern of ceramic brackets bonded to composite resin laminate veneers. Eur J Orthod 17 (1995) 533-540
12. Oliver R.G. The effect of different methods of bracket removal on the amount of residual adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 93 (1988) 196-200
13. Littlewood S.J., and Redhead A. Use of jigs to standardize orthodontic bond testing. J Dent 26 (1998) 539-545
14. Oesterle L.J., Shellhart W.C., and Belanger G.K. The use of bovine enamel in bonding studies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113 (1998) 514-519
15. Nakamichi I., Iwaku M., and Fusayama T. Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. J Dent Res 62 (1983) 1076-1081
16. Klocke A., and Kahl-Nieke B. Influence of force location in orthodontic shear bond strength testing. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 391-396