International regulation on health, safety, and the environment - Trends and challenges

Journal of Consumer Policy

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 3-24

  Micklitz, Hans W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748454852     PISSN: 01687034     EISSN: 15730700     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1006302721189     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Charnovitz, S. (1997). Critical guide to the WTO's Report on Trade and Environment. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 14, 341-379.
2. Eggers, B. (1998). Die Entscheidung des WTO Appellate Body im Hormonfall. Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 8, 147-151.
3. Harland, D. (1987). Some international dimensions of consumer policy and law. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 29, 451-467.
4. Hedemann-Robinson, M. (2000). Defending the consumer's right to a clean environment in the face of globalization? The case of extraterritorial environmental protection under European Community Law. Journal of Consumer Policy, 23, this issue, 25-61.
5. Hippler Bello, J. H., & Shenk, M. D. (1996). WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Art. XX environmental exceptions to GATT - National treatment - Consistency with GATT of U.S. rules regarding imports of reformulated gasoline. American Journal of International Law, 90, 669-674.
6. Joerges, C., Falke, J., Micklitz, H.-W., & Brüggemeier, G. (1988). Die Sicherheit von Konsumgütern und die Entwicklung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
7. Kleftodimou, L. (1995). Protecting the consumer under GATT. Consumer Law Journal, 3, 174-187.
8. Merciai, P. (1986). Consumer protection and the United Nations. Journal of World Trade Law, 20, 206-231.
9. Micklitz, H.-W. (1995). Internationales Produktsicherheitsrecht. Zur Begründung einer Rechtsverfassung für den Handel mit risikobehafteten Produkten. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
10. OECD (1986). International trade and the consumer. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
11. Ohlhoff, S. (1999). Beteiligung von Verbänden und Unternehmen im WTO-Streitbeilegungsverfahren. Das Shrimps-Turtle-Verfahren als Wendepunkt? Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 9, 139-144.
12. Petersmann, E.-U. (1996). Constitutionalism and international organizations. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 17, 398-469.
13. Raustiala, K. (1997). The "participatory revolution" in international environmental law. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 21, 537-586.
14. Reich, A. (1996). From diplomacy to law: The juridicization of international trade relations. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 17, 775-849.
15. Reichert, W. M. (1996). Resolving the trade and environment conflict: The WTO and NGO consultative relations. Minnesota Journal of Global Trade, 5, 219-246.
16. Schoenbaum, T. J. (1997). International trade and protection of the environment: The continuing search for reconciliation. American Journal of International Law, 91, 268-313.
17. Shell, G. R. (1996). The trade stakeholders model and participation by nonstate parties in the World Trade Organization. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 17, 359-381.
18. Snoderly, A. B. (1996), Clearing the air: Environmental regulation, dispute resolution and domestic sovereignty under the World Trade Agreement. North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, 22, 241-306.
19. Steinberg, R. H. (1997). Trade-environment negotiations in the EU, NAFTA, and WTO: Regional trajectories of rule development. American Journal of International Law, 91, 231-267.