Comparative analysis of the prostate cancer detection rate according to region and number of biopsy in patient with elevated serum PSA

Korean Journal of Urology

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 591-595

  Ahn, Heung Seok ^a   Kwon, Chil Hun ^a   Joo, Kwan Joong ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Prostate specific antigen; Prostatic neoplasms

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; QUINOLINE DERIVED ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ANTIGEN DETECTION; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; HUMAN; IMMUNORADIOMETRIC ASSAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MCNEMAR TEST; ORGAN SIZE; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 33748454630     PISSN: 04944747     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4111/kju.2006.47.6.591     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 1989;142:71-4
2. Cookson MS. Update on transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate. Mol Urol 2000;4:93-7
3. Uzzo RG, Wei JT, Waldbaum RS, Perlmutter AP, Byrne JC, Vaughan ED Jr. The influence of prostate size on cancer detection. Urology 1995;46:831-6
4. Park YS, Kwak C, Shim HB. Effect of prostate size on cancer detection rate of traditional sextant prostate biopsy. Korean J Urol 2003;44:1098-102
5. Stamey TA. Making the most of six systematic sextant biopsies. Urology 1995;45:2-12
6. Terris MK, Wallen EM, Stamey TA. Comparison of mid-lobe versus lateral systematic sextant biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer. Urol Int 1997;59:239-42
7. Lee SB, Kim CS, Ahn HJ. Comparative analysis of sextant and extended prostate biopsy. Korean J Urol 2004;45:524-9
8. Presti JC Jr, Chang JJ, Bhargava V, Shinohara K. The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. J Urol 2000; 163:163-6
9. Moon KH, Cheon SH, Kim CS. Systematic 10-site prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. Korean J Urol 2000;41:1178-82
10. Durkan GC, Sheikh N, Johnson P, Hildreth AJ, Greene DR. Improving prostate cancer detection with an extended-core transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy protocol. BJU Int 2002;89:33-9
11. Ravery V, Goldblatt L, Royer B, Blanc E, Toublanc M, Boccon-Gibod L. Extensive biopsy protocol improves the detection rate of prostate cancer. J Urol 2000; 164:393-6
12. Park HK, Byun SS, Sohn DW, Hong SK, Lee ES, Lee ES. The efficacy of 12-site biopsy protocol in men with elevated serum prostate specific antigen level only. Korean J Urol 2005;46:463-6
13. Borboroglu PG, Comer SW, Riffenburgh RH, Amling CL. Extensive repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in patients with previous benign sextant biopsies. J Urol 2000; 163:158-62
14. Babaian RJ, Toi A, Kamoi K, Troncoso P, Sweet J, Evans R, et al. A comparative, analysis of sextant and an extended 11-core multisite directed biopsy strategy. J Urol 2000;163: 152-7
15. de la Taille A, Antiphon P, Salomon L, Cherfan M, Porcher R, Hoznek A, et al. Prospective evaluation of a 21-sample needle biopsy procedure designed to improve the prostate cancer detection rate. Urology 2003;61:1181-6
16. Bae KS, Chang SG. Comparative analysis between sextant biopsy and 12-samples needle biopsy for detection of stage T1c prostate cancer. Korean J Urol 2004;45:653-7
17. Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL. Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1997;157:199-202
18. Karakiewicz PI, Bazinet M, Aprikian AG, Trudel C, Aronson S, Nachabe M, et al. Outcome of sextant biopsy according to gland volume. Urology 1997;49:55-9
19. Jung JY, Jeong H, Chung JS, Lee SB, Lee SE. The outcome of TRUS-guided sextant biopsy according to prostate volume. Korean J Urol 2000;41:505-11