Statistical evaluation of music information retrieval experiments

Journal of New Music Research

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 113-120

  Flexer, Arthur ^a,b  

^a Institute of Medical Cybernetics and Artificial Intelligence   (Austria)

^b Medical University of Vienna   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748450506     PISSN: 09298215     EISSN: 17445027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09298210600834946     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aucouturier, J.-J. & Pachet, F. (2002). Music similarity measures: what's the use? In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR'02) pp. 157 - 163, Paris: IRCAM.
2. Buyoli, C.L. & Loureiro, R. (Eds.). (2004). Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR 2004). Barcelona: Audiovisual Institute, Pompeu Fabra University.
3. Cohen, P.R. (1995). Empirical Methods for Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Dietterich, T.G. (1998). Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classi.cation learning algorithms. Neural Computation, 10(7), 1895-1924.
5. Downie, J.S. (2004). The scientific evaluation of music information retrieval systems: foundations and future. Computer Music Journal, 28(2), 12-23.
6. Efron, B. (1982). The Jackknife, the Bootstrap, and Other Resampling Plans. SIAM CBMS-NSF Monograph 38, Philadelphia.
7. Egmont-Petersen, M., Talmon, J.L., Brender, J. & McNair, P. (1994). On the quality of neural net classifiers. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 6, 359-381.
8. Everitt, B.S. (1977). The Analysis of Contingency Tables. London: Chapman & Hall.
9. Feelders, A. & Verkooijen W. (1995). Which method learns most from the data? In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on AI and Statistics, January 1995, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, pp. 219-225.
10. Flexer, A. (1996). Statistical evaluation of neural network experiments: minimum requirements and current practice. In: R. Trappl (Ed.), Cybernetics and Systems '96. pp. 1005-1008. Wien: Oesterreichische Studiengesellschaft fuer Kybernetik.
11. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. & Friedman, J. (2001). The Elements of Statistical Learning. New York/Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
12. Kibler, D. & Langley, P. 1988. Machine learning as an experimental science. Machine Learning, 3(1), 5-8.
13. Logan, B. & Salomon, A. (2001). A music similarity function based on signal analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Tokyo, Japan, p. 190.
14. Michie, D., Spiegelhalter, D.J. & Taylor, C.C. (Eds.). (1994). Machine Learning, Neural and Statistical Classification. England: Ellis Horwood.
15. Mosteller, F. & Tukey, J.W. (1977). Data Analysis and Regression - A Second Course in Statistics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16. Pampalk, E. (2004). A Matlab Toolbox to compute music similarity from audio. In Buyoli & Loureiro (2004). pp. 254-257.
17. Pampalk, E., Flexer, A. & Widmer, G. (2005). Improvements of audio-based music similarity and genre classification. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR'05), London, UK, 11-15 September, pp. 628-633.
18. Prechelt, L. (1996). A quantative study of experimental evaluations of neural network learning algorithms: current research practice. Neural Networks, 9(3), 457-462.
19. Ripley, B.D. (1992). Statistical Aspects of Neural Networks. Oxford: Department of Statistics, University of Oxford.
20. Salzberg, S. (1997). On comparing classifiers: pitfalls to avoid and a recommended approach. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1(3), 317-328.
21. Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill.
22. Tzanetakis, G. & Cook, P. (2002). Musical genre classification of audio signals. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 10(5), 293-302.