Psychological formulations in psychiatric care: Staff views on their impact

Psychiatric Bulletin

Volumn 30, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 341-343

  Summers, Alison ^a  

^a ROYAL PRESTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DISEASE SEVERITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; JOB SATISFACTION; MEDICAL STAFF; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REHABILITATION CENTER; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TEAMWORK;

EID: 33748440551     PISSN: 09556036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1192/pb.30.9.341     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. ALANEN, Y. O., LEHTINEN, V., AALTONEN, J., et al (2000) The Finnish integrated model for early treatment of schizophrenia and related psychoses. In Psychological Approaches and their Effectiveness (eds B. Martindale, A. Bateman, M. Crowe et al) pp. 235-265. London: Gaskell.
2. CHADWICK, P., WILLIAMS, C. & MacKENZIE, J. (2003) Impact of case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 67-80.
3. DAVENPORT, S. (1997) Pathological interactions between psychosis and childhood sexual abuse in in-patient settings: their dynamics, consequences and management. In Psychotherapy of Psychosis (eds C. Mace & F. Margison) pp. 205-219. London: Gaskell.
4. DAVENPORT, S. (2002) Acute wards: problems and solutions. Psychiatric Bulletin, 26, 385-388.
5. HAIGH, R. (2000) Support systems: 2. Staff sensitivity groups. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 6, 312-319.
6. MILES, M. B. & HUBERMAN, A. M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage.