Different selection principles of freestanding and bound morphemes in language production

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1201-1207

  Schiller, Niels O ^a,b,c   Costa, Albert ^d  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Freestanding and bound morphemes; Gender congruency; Language production; Open and closed class words; Psycholinguistics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SEX DIFFERENCE; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SEX FACTORS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 33748424383     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1201     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM], Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium. Uni-versily of Pennsylvania.
2. Bock, K., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945-984). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3. Caramazza, A., Miozzo, M., Costa, A., Schiller, N. O., & Alario, F.-X. (2001). A cross-linguistic investigation of determiner production. In E. Dupoux (Ed.). Language, brain and cognitive development: Essays in honor of Jacques Mehler (pp. 209-226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Cholin, J., Schiller, N. O., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The preparation of syllables in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 47-61.
5. Costa, A., Kovacic, D., Fedorenko, E., & Caramazza, A. (2003). The gender-congruency effect and the selection of freestanding and bound morphemes: Evidence from Croatian. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1270-1282.
6. Dell, G. S. (1990). Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 313-349.
7. Garrett, M. F. (1982). Production of speech: Observations from normal and pathological language use. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp. 19-76). London: Academic Press.
8. Garrett, M. F. (1993). Errors and their relevance for models of language production. In G. Blanken, J. Dittman, H. Grimm, J. C. Marshall, & C.-W. Wallesch (Eds.), Linguistic disorders and pathologies: An international handbook (pp. 72-92). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
9. La Heij, W., Mak, P., Sander, J., & Willeboordse, E. (1998). The gender congruency effect in picture-word tasks. Psychological Research, 61, 209-219.
10. Lapointe, S. G. (1985). A theory of verb form use in the speech of agrammatic aphasies. Brain and Language, 24, 100-155.
11. Lapointe, S. G., & Dell, G. S. (1989). A synthesis of some recent work in sentence production. In G. N. Carlson & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Linguistic structure in language processing (pp. 107-156). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Schiller, N. O., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Grammatical feature selection in noun phrase production: Evidence from German and Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 169-194.
13. Schiller, N. O., & Caramazza, A. (in press). Grammatical gender selection and the representation of morphemes: The production of Dutch diminutives. Language and Cognitive Processes.
14. Schriefers, H. (1993). Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 841-850.
15. Schriefers, H., Jescheniak, J. D., & Hantsch, A. (2005). Selection of gender-marked morphemes in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 159-168.
16. Schriefers, H., & Teruel, E. (2000). Grammatical gender in noun phrase production: The gender interference effect in German. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1368-1377.
17. Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (2004). Phonological facilitation of grammatical gender retrieval. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 677-711.