Risk assessment of sex offenders: The current position in the UK

Child Abuse Review

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 257-272

  Mandeville Norden, Rebecca ^a,b   Beech, Anthony R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b DCPA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Actuarial risk assessment; Clinical risk assessment; OASys; Probation service; Sex offenders

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748412769     PISSN: 09529136     EISSN: 10990852     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/car.944     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Allam J. 2000. Community-based treatment for child sex offenders: An evaluation. Unpublished doctoral thesis.
2. Beech AR. 1998. A psychometric typology of child abusers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 42: 319-339.
3. Beech AR. 2001. Case material and interview. In Handbook of Offender Assessment and Treatment, Hollin C (ed.). Wiley: Chichester; 123-136.
4. Beech AR, Ward T. 2004. The integration of etiology and risk in sex offenders: A theoretical model. Aggression and Violent Behavior 10: 31-63.
5. Beech, AR, Friendship C, Erikson M, Hanson RK. 2002. The relationship between static and dynamic risk factors and reconviction in a sample of UK child abusers. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment 14: 155-167.
6. Beech, AR, Fisher D, Thornton D. 2003. Risk assessment of sex offenders. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice 34: 339-352.
7. Craig LA, Thornton D, Beech AR, Browne KD (in press). The relationship of statistical and psychological risk markers to sexual reconviction. Criminal Justice and Behavior.
8. Craissati J, Beech AR. 2003. A review of dynamic variables and their relationship to reconviction. Journal of Sexual Aggression 9: 41-56.
9. Gendreau P, Little T, Coggin C. 1996. Meta-analysis of adult offender recidivism: What works! Criminology 34: 575-607.
10. Grove WM, Zald DH, Lebow BS, Snitz BE, Nelson C. 2000. Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment. 12: 19-30.
11. Gunn J. 1997. Let's get serious about dangerousness. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, suppl., 51-64.
12. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. 1982. The meaning and use of the area under a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve. Radiology 143: 29-36.
13. Hanson RK. 1997. The Development of a Brief Actuarial Risk Scale for Sexual Offence Recidivism (User Report 1997-04). Department of the Solicitor General of Canada: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Available: www.sgc.gc.ca/ publications/corrections/199704_e.pdf [20 November 2005].
14. Hanson RK, Bussière MT. 1998. Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 66: 348-362.
15. Hanson RK, Harris A. 1998. Dynamic Predictors of Sexual Recidivism. Department of the Solicitor General Canada: Corrections Research Ottawa: Ontario, Canada. Available: http://www.sgc.gc.ca/epub/corr/ e199801b/e199801b. htm [30 October 2005].
16. Hanson RK, Harris A. 2000. Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offense recidivism. Criminal Justice & Behaviour 27: 6-35.
17. Hanson RK, Harris A. 2001. The Sex Offender Need Assessment Rating (SONAR): A Method of Measuring Changes in Risk Levels. Available: www.sgc.gc.ca/epub/corr/e200001a/e200001b/e200001b.htm [25 October 2005].
18. Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon K. 2004. Predictors of Sexual Recidivism: An Updated Meta-analysis. Department of the Solicitor General Canada: Corrections Research Ottawa.
19. Hanson RK, Thornton D. 2000. Improving risk assessment for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior 24: 119-136.
20. Hanson RK, Morton KE, Harris AJR. 2003. Sexual offender recidivism risk - What we know and what we need to know. In Prentky R, Janus E, Seto MC, Burgess AW (eds), Understanding and managing sexually coercive behaviour. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 989: 154-166.
21. Hare RD. 1991. The Hare Psychopathy Checklist - Revised. In Cooke DJ, Michie C. 1997. An item response theory analysis of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Psychological Assessment 9: 3-14.
22. Hart SD. 1998. The role of psychopathy in assessing risk for violence: Conceptual and methodological issues. Legal and Criminological Psychology 3: 121-137.
23. Hart SD, Laws DR, Kropp PR. 2003. The risk-need model of offender rehabilitation. In Theoretical Issues and Controversies in Sexual Deviance, Ward T, Laws DR, Hudson SM (eds). Sage: London; 338-354.
24. Home Office. 2002. Offender Assessment System (OASys). Available: www.crimereduction.gov.uk [15 November 2005].
25. Hood R, Shute S, Feilzer M, Wilcox A. 2002. Sex offenders emerging from long-term imprisonment; A study of their long-term reconviction rates and of parole board members'. British Journal of Criminology 42: 371-394.
26. Kemshall H. 1996. Reviewing Risk: A Review of Research on the Assessment and Management of Risk and Dangerousness: Implications for Policy in the Probation Service. A Report for the Home Office Research and Statistics Directorate. Home Office: London.
27. Kemshall H. 2003. The Community Management of High Risk Offenders: A Consideration of Best Practice Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA). Prison Service Journal 126: 2-5.
28. May C. 1999. Explaining Reconviction following a Community sentence: The Role of Social Factors. Home Office Research Study No. 192. Home Office: London.
29. Menzies R, Webster CD, McMain S, Staley S, Scaglione R. 1994. The dimensions of dangerousness revisited: Assessing forensic predictions about violence. Law and Human Behaviour 18: 1-28.
30. Merrington S, Baker K, Wilkinson B. 2003. Using risk and need assessment tools in probation and youth justice, Vista 8: 31-38.
31. Mossman D. 1994. Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 62: 783-792.
32. Quinsey VL. 1980. The base-rate problem and the prediction of dangerousness: A reappraisal. Journal of Psychiatry and the Law 8: 329-340.
33. Quinsey VL, Rice ME, Harris GT. 1995. Actuarial prediction of sexual recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 10: 85-105.
34. Quinsey VL, Harris GT, Rice ME, Cormier C. 1998. Violent Offenders: Appraising and Managing Risk. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC.
35. Prentky RA, Burgess AW. 2000. Forensic Management of Sexual Offenders. Kluwer Academic/Plenum: London.
36. Rice ME, Harris GT. 1997. Cross validation and extension of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide for child molesters and rapists. Law and Human Behavior 21: 231-241.
37. Sjostedt G, Grann. (2002). Risk Assessment: What is Being Predicted by Actuarial Prediction Instruments? International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 1: 179-183.
38. Taylor R. 1999. Predicting Reconvictions for Sexual and Violent Offences using the Revised Offender Group Reconviction Scale. Home Office Research Findings 104. Home Office: London.
39. Thornton D. 2002. Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 14: 137-151.
40. Thornton D, Mann R, Webster S, Blud L, Travers R, Friendship C, Erikson M. 2003. Distinguishing and combining risks for sexual and violent recidivism. In Prentky R, Janus E, Seto M, Burgess AW (eds), Understanding and managing sexually coercive behaviour. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 989: 225-235.
41. Ward T, Beech AR. 2004. The etiology of risk: A preliminary model. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 16: 271-284.
42. Webster C, Douglas K, Eaves D, Hart S. 1997. HCR-20 Assessing Risk for Violence: Version II. Mental Health, Law & Policy Institute, Simon Frazier University: Burnaby, British Columbia.