Remembering and interpreting informed consent: A qualitative study of drug trial participants

Journal of the American Board of Family Practice

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 14-22

  Russell Searight, H ^a,b,d,f   Miller, Cheryl K ^a,c,e  

^a Deaconess Family Medicine   (United States)

^b SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c ST LOUIS COLLEGE OF PHARMACY   (United States)

^d Department of Psychology ^*  (United States)

^e SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f Deaconess Family Medicine Program   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748390249     PISSN: 08938652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Applebaum PS, Lidz CW, Meisel A. Informed consent: legal theory and clinical practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.
2. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. The Belmont Report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, 1979.
3. Bergler JH, Pennington AC, Metcalfe M, Preis ED. Informed consent: how much does the patient understand? Clin Pharmacol Ther 1980;27:435-40.
4. Taub HA, Baker MT. The effect of repeated testing upon comprehension of informed consent materials by elderly volunteers. Exp Aging Res 1983;9:135-8.
5. Taub HA, Baker MT. A reevaluation of informed consent in the elderly: a method for improving com-prehension through direct testing. Clin Res 1984;32:17-21.
6. Miller CK, Searight HR, Barbarash RA, Grable D, Schwarte R, Sowell C. Comprehension and recall of the informational content of the informed consent document: an evaluation of 168 patients in a controlled clinical trial. J Clin Res Drug Develop 1994;8:237-48.
7. Beecher H. Ethics and clinical research. N Engl J Med 1966;274:1354-60.
8. Rothman DJ. Strangers at the bedside: a history of how law and bioethics transformed medical decision-making. New York: Basic Books, 1992.
9. Wade TC. Patients may not recall disclosure of risk of death: implications for informed consent. Med Sci Law 1990;30:259-62.
10. Miller CK, Corboy DL, Searight HR, Barbarash RA. Validation of a test to evaluate research subject understanding of informed consent. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Meeting of the Associates of Clinical Pharmacology, San Antonio, Tex, March 23-26, 1994.
11. Corboy DL, Miller CK, Searight HR, Barbarash RA. Preliminary evaluation of research patients' understanding of informed consent. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Meeting of the Associates of Clinical Pharmacology, San Antonio, Tex, March 23-26, 1994.
12. Applebaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW. The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research. Int J Law Psychiatry, 1982;5:319-24.
13. Kuzel A. Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In Crabtree BF, Miller WL, editors. Doing qualitative research: multiple strategies (Research methods for primary care series, vol. 3.) Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications, 1992.
14. Lidz C, Meisel A, Zerubavel E, Carter M, Sestak RM, Roth LH. Informed consent: a study of decision-making in psychiatry. New York: Guilford Press, 1984.
15. McCracken G. The long interview. (Qualitative methods research series, vol. 13.) Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications, 1988.
16. Spradley JP. The ethnographic interview. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1979.
17. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications, 1990.
18. Rennie D, Phillips J. Quartoro J. Grounded theory: a promising approach to conceptualization in psychology. Can J Psychol 1988;29:139-50.
19. Corbin JM, Strauss A. Unending work and care: managing chronic illness at home. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1988.
20. Wiemer C, Strauss A, Fagerhaugh S, Suczek B. Trajectories, biographies, and the evolving medical technology: labor and delivery and the intensive care nursery. Sociol Health Illness 1979;1:261-83.
21. Searight HR, Barbarash RA. Informed consent: clinical and legal issues in family practice. Farn Med 1994;26:244-9.
22. Park LC, Covi L. Nonblind placebo trial: an exploration of neurotic patients' responses to placebo when its inert content is disclosed. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1965;12:336-45.
23. Rubin Z, Mitchell C. Couples research as couples counseling: some unintended effects of studying close relationships. Am Psychol 1976;31:17-25.
24. Kleinman A. The illness narratives: suffering, healing and the human condition. New York: Basic Books, 1988.
25. Fisher S. In the patient's best interest: women and the politics of medical decisions. New Brunswick NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1988.
26. Lavelle-Jones C, Byrne DJ, Rice P, Cuschieri A. Factors affecting quality of informed consent. Br Med J 1993;306:885-90.
27. Schwartz R. The effect of time on comprehension of informed consent material. Masters thesis-Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, 111, 1995.
28. Maccoby EE, Jacklin CN. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford Calif: Stanford University Press, 1974.
29. Tymchuk AJ, Ouslander JG. Does position of information have an effect upon what elderly people in long-term care remember? Educ Gerontol 1991;17:11-9.