Neural processes involved with perception of non-native durational contrasts

NeuroReport

Volumn 17, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 1353-1357

  Callan, Akiko M ^a   Callan, Daniel E ^a   Tajima, Keiichi ^a   Akahane Yamada, Reiko ^a  

^a ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Durational contrasts; Functionalmagnetic resonance imaging; Phonetic contrast; Speech perception; Speech production

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN REGION; CONSONANT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOWEL;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTILINGUALISM; OXYGEN; PHONETICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 33748377127     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000224774.66904.29     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Miyawaki K, Strange W, Verbrugge R, Liberman A, Jenkins JJ, Fujimura O. An effect of linguistic experience: the discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Percept Psychophys 1975; 18:331-340.
2. Callan DE, Jones JA, Callan AM, Akahane-Yamada R. Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory-auditory/orosensory internal models. NeuroImage 2004; 22:1182-1194.
3. Callan DE, Tajima K, Callan AM, Kubo R, Masaki S, Akahane-Yamada R. Learning-induced neural plasticity associated with improved identification performance after training of a difficult second-language phonetic contrast. NeuroImage 2003; 19:113-124.
4. Golestani N, Zatorre RJ. Learning new sounds of speech: reallocation of neural substrates. NeuroImage 2004; 21:494-506.
5. Celsis P, Boulanouar K, Doyon B, Ranjeva JP, Berry I, Nespoulous JL, et al. Differential fMRI responses in the left posterior superior temporal gyrus to habituation and change detection in syllables and tones. NeuroImage 1999; 9:135-144.
6. Watkins K, Paus T. Modulation of motor excitability during speech perception: the role of Broca's area. J Cogn Neurosci 2004; 16:978-87.
7. Wilson SM, Saygin AP, Sereno MI, Iacoboni M. Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7:701-702.
8. Fadiga L, Craighero L, Buccino G, Rizzolatti G. Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study. Eur J Neurosci 2002; 15:399-402.
9. Watkins K, Strafella AP, Paus T. Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production. Neuropsychologia 2003; 48:989-994.
10. Bradlow A, Pisoni D, Akahane-Yamada R, Tohkura Y. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 101:2299-2310.
11. Toda T. Acquisition of special morae in Japanese as a second language. J Phonet Soc Jpn 2003; 7: 70-83.
12. Gandour J, Wong D, Lowe M, Dzemidzic M, Satthamnuwong N, Tong Y, et al. Neural circuitry underlying perception of duration depends on language experience. Brain Lang 2002; 83:268-290.
13. Minagawa-Kawai Y, Mori K, Sato Y, Koizumi T. Differential cortical responses in second language learners to different vowel contrasts. NeuroReport 2004; 15:899-903.
14. Gandour J, Wong D, Lowe M, Dzemidzic M, Satthamnuwong N, Tong Y, et al. A cross-linguistic fMRI study of spectral and temporal cues underlying phonological processing. J Cong Neurosci 2002; 14:1076-1087.
15. Guenther FH. Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation, and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production. Psychol Rev 1995; 102:594-621.
16. Guenther FH, Perkell JS. A neural model of speech production and its application to studies of the role of auditory feedback in speech. In: Maassen B, Kent R, Peters H, Van Lieshout P, Hulstijn W, editors. Speech motor control in normal and disordered speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. pp. 29-49.
17. Wager TD, Nichols TE. Optimization of experimental design in fMRI: a general framework using a genetic algorithm. NeuroImage 2003;18:293-309.
18. Price CJ, Moore CJ, Humphreys GW, Wise RJ. Segregating semantic from phonological processes during reading. J Cogn Neurosci 1997; 9:727-733.
19. Mathiak K, Hertrich I, Grodd W, Ackermann H. Cerebellum and speech perception: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Cogn Neurosci 2002; 14:902-912.
20. Warren JE, Wise RJ, Warren JD. Sounds do-able: auditory-motor transformations and the posterior temporal plane. Trend Neurosci 2005; 28:636-643.
21. Grodd W, Hulsmann E, Lotze M, Wildgruber D, Erb M. Sensorimotor mapping of the human cerebellum: fMRI evidence of somatopic organization. Hum Brain Mapp 2001; 13:55-73.
22. Paulesu E, Frith CD, Frackowiak RSJ. The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory. Nature 1993; 362:342-345.
23. Gelfand JR, Bookheimer SY. Dissociating neural mechanisms of temporal sequencing and processing phonemes. Neuron 2003; 38:831-842.
24. Fant G. Acoustic theory of speech production. Mouton: The Hague; 1960.
25. Novick JM, Trueswell JC, Thompson-Schill SL. Cognitive control and parsing: reexamining the role of Broca's area in sentence comprehension. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2005; 5:263-281.