Problems experienced by patients receiving parenteral nutrition at home: Results of an open interview study

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 215-221

  Waal, Getty Huisman De ^a   Naber, Ton ^b   Schoonhoven, Lisette ^a   Persoon, Anke ^a   Sauerwein, Hans ^c   Van Achterberg, Theo ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Ziekenhuis Hilversum   (Netherlands)

^c ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PARENTERAL NUTRITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMBULATORY CARE FACILITIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARENTERAL NUTRITION, HOME; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF EFFICACY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 33748376256     PISSN: 01486071     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0148607106030003215     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Jeppesen PB, Langholz E, Mortensen PB. Quality of life in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition. Gut. 1999;44:844-852.
2. Carlsson E, Bosaeus I, Nordgen S. Quality of life and concerns in patients with short bowel syndrome. Clin Nutr. 2003;22:445-452.
3. Herfindal ET, Linda MPH, Bernstein R, Kudzia K, Wong A. Survey of home nutritional support patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1989;13:255-261.
4. Dimartini A, Rovera GM, Graham TO, et al. Quality of life after small intestinal transplantation and among home parenteral nutrition patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1998;22:357-362.
5. van Reeuwijk-Werkhorst J. Enterale en parenterale voeding thuis [Enteral and parenteral nutrition at home (in Dutch)]. Nederlands Tijdschrift Diëtisten. 2001;56:207-213.
6. Persoon A, Huisman-de Waal G, Naber T, et al. Impact of long term HPN on daily life. Clin Nutr. 2005;24:304-313.
7. Nievaard AC. Validiteit en betrouwbaarheid in kwalitatief onderzoek [Validity and reliability in qualitative research]. In: Maso I, Smaling A, eds. Objectiυiteit in Kwalitatief Onderzoek [Objectivity in Qualitative Research (in Dutch)]. Meppel: Boom; 1990:75-84.
8. th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott; 1999.
9. th ed. Assen: Van Gorcum; 1989.
10. Bozetti F, Boggio B, Chiavenna G, et al. Central venous catheter complications in 447 patients on home parenteral nutrition: an analysis of over 100,000 catheter days. Clin Nutr. 2002;21:475-485.
11. Goverde K, Grypdonck M. Leven met dialyse: een onderzoek naar de beleving van patiënten in een passief dialysecentrum behandeld. Verpleegkunde. 1998;13:217-225.
12. Van der Ploeg HM. Handleiding bij de Zelf-beoordelings Vragen lijst ZBV: Een Nederlandstalige bewerking van de Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [Manual of Spielberger's State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (in Dutch)]. Lisse: Swets en Zeitlinger B.V.; 1981.
13. Robb RA, Brakebill JI, Ivey MF, Christensen DB, Young JH, Scribner BH. Subjective assessment of patient outcomes of home parenteral nutrition. Gut. 1983;40:1646-1650.
14. Smith CE, Curias, S, Kleinbeck SVM, et al. Clinical trial of interactive and videotaped educational interventions reduce infection, reactive depression and rehospitalizations for sepsis in patients on home parenteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003;27:137-145.
15. Pibernik-Okanovic M, Prasek M, Poljicanin-Filipovic T, Pavlic-Renar I, Metelko Z. Effects of an empowerment-based psycho-social intervention on quality of life and metabolic control in type 2 diabetic patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;52:193-199.
16. Hirsch A, Woods-Buggeln S. Empowerment: a matter of choice. Diabetes Voice. 2001;46:7-10.
17. Rehse B, Pukrop R. Effects of psychosocial interventions on quality of life in adult cancer patients: meta-analysis of 37 published controlled outcome studies. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;50: 179-186.
18. Fawzy FI. Psychosocial interventions for patients with cancer: what works and what doesn't. Eur J Cancer. 1999;11:1559-1564.