Commentary on "An analytical hierarchy process model to apportion co-author responsibility"

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 567-570

  Loui, Michael C ^a,b  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Accountability; Co authorship; Moral responsibility; Role responsibility

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MORALITY; NOTE; PEER REVIEW; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; WRITING;

AUTHORSHIP; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PROFESSIONAL ROLE; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 33748372270     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-006-0054-3     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Kreider, D. L., Kuller, R. G., Ostberg, D. R., and Perkins, F. W. (1966) An Introduction to Linear Analysis, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
2. Kennedy, D. (1997) Academic Duty, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Sheskin, T. J. (2006) An Analytical Hierarchy Process Model to Apportion Co-author Responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (3): 555-565.
4. Tompa, M. (1999) Figures of merit. ACM SIGACT News 20 (1): 62-71.
5. Ladd, J. (1982) Collective and individual moral responsibility in engineering: some questions. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 1 (2): 3-10.