Study of different atmospheric-pressure interfaces for LC-MS/MS determination of acrylamide in water at sub-ppb levels

Journal of Mass Spectrometry

Volumn 41, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1041-1048

  Marín, José M ^a   Pozo, Óscar J ^a   Sancho, Juan V ^a   Pitarch, Elena ^a   López, Francisco J ^a   Hernández, Félix ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

Author keywords

Acrylamide; Atmospheric pressure interfaces; Liquid chromatography; Tandem mass spectrometry; Water

Indexed keywords

AMINES; ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WATER;

ACRYLAMIDE; ATMOSPHERIC-PRESSURE INTERFACES; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; WATER SAMPLES;

INTERFACES (MATERIALS);

ACRYLAMIDE; DRINKING WATER; GROUND WATER; SURFACE WATER;

ARTICLE; ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ELECTROSPRAY; EUROPEAN UNION; IONIZATION; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; POLARIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOLID PHASE EXTRACTION; WATER FLOW; WATER SAMPLING; WATER STANDARD;

ACRYLAMIDES; CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; EUROPEAN UNION; MASS SPECTROMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPECTROMETRY, MASS, ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION; WATER; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 33748367891     PISSN: 10765174     EISSN: 10969888     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jms.1063     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. US Environmental Protection Agency. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Cincinnati, OH, 2002. www.epa.gov/safewater/mcl.html.
2. International Agency for research on Cancer. Momographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Lyon, 1994; 389. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ ENG/Monographs/vol60/ volume60.pdf.
3. WHO guidelines for Drinking-water Quality. Geneva, 2003.
4. European council Drinking Water Directive EU 98/83/EC. Brussels, 1998.
5. Zhang Y, Zhang G, Zhang Y. Occurrence and analytical methods of acrylamide in heat-treated foods. Review and recent developments. J. Chromatogr., A 2005; 1075: 1.
6. Castle L, Eriksson S. Analytical methods used to measure acrylamide concentrations in foods. J. AOAC Int. 2005; 88: 274.
7. Wenzl T, de la Calle MB, Anklam E. Analytical methods for the determination of acrylamide in food products: a review. Food Addit. Contam. 2003; 20: 885.
8. Núñez O, Moyano E, Galcerán MT. LC-MS/MS analysis of organic toxics in food. Trends Anal. Chem. 2005; 24: 683.
9. US Environmental Protection Agency. Method 8032A: Acrylamide by Gas Spectrometry: Cincinnati, OH, 1996; http://www.epa.gov/SW-846/pdfs/8032a.pdf.
10. Licea Perez H, Osterman-Golkar S. A sensitive gas chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric method for detection of alkylating agents in water: application to acrylamide in drinking water, coffee and snuff. Analyst 2003; 128: 1033.
11. Kawata K, Ibaraki T, Tanabe A, Yagoh H, Shinoda A, Suzuki H, Yasuhara A. Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric determination of hydrophilic compounds in environmental water by solid-phase extraction with activated carbon fiber felt. J. Chromatogr., A 2001; 911: 75.
12. Weideborg M, Kallqvist T, Odegard KE, Sverdrup LE, Vik EA. Environmental assesment of acrylamide and methyloacrylamide from a grouting agent used in the tunnel construction of Romeriksporten, Norway. Wat. Res. 2001; 35: 2645.
13. 2 using triple quadrupole and hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight analyzers. Trends Anal. Chem. 2005; 24: 596.
14. Reemtsma T. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and strategies for trace-level analysis of polar organic pollutants. J. Chromatogr., A 2003; 1000: 477.
15. Cavalli S, Polesello S, Saccani G. Determination of acrylamide in drinking water by large-volume direct injection and ion-exclusion chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr., A 2004; 1039: 155.
16. Stolker AAM, Niesing W, Hogendoorn EA, Rambali AB, Vleeming W. Determination of nicotine and cotinine in rat plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr., A 2003; 1020: 35.
17. Hernández F, Ibáñez M, Sancho JV, Pozo OJ. Comparison of different mass spectrometric techniques combined with liquid chromatography for confirmation of pesticides in environmental water based on the use of identification points. Anal. Chem. 2004; 76: 4349.
18. Pozo OJ, Sancho JV, Ibáñez M, Hernández F, Niessen WMA. Exploring the confirmation of organic micropollutants findings in environmental samples by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry: achievements and pitfalls. Trends Anal. Chem. (in press).
19. Grimalt S, Pozo OJ, Marín JM, Sancho JV, Hernández F. Evaluation of different quantitative approaches for the determination of non-easily ionizable molecules by different atmospheric pressure interfaces used in liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry: Abamectin as case of study. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2005; 16: 1619.
20. Matuszewski BK. Standard line slopes as a measure of a relative matrix effect in quantitative HPLC-MS bioanalysis. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2006; 830: 293.
21. European Union Decision 2002/657/EC. Brussels, 2002.
22. Jemal M, Hawthorne DJ. Effect of high performance liquid chromatography mobile phase (methanol vs acetonitrile) on the positive and negative ion electrospray response of a compound that contains both an unsaturated lactone and a methyl sulfone group. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1999; 13: 61.
23. Souverain S, Rudaz S, Veuthey JL. Matrix effect in LC-ESI-MS and LC-APCI-MS with off-line and on-line extraction procedures. J. Chromatogr., A 2004; 1058: 61.