Facilitating analysis with implicit and explicit self-disclosures

Psychoanalytic Dialogues

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 241-262

  Gediman, Helen K ^a,b,c,d,e,f  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b New York Freudian Society   (United States)

^c Washington Sq Inst Fam F   (United States)

^d Federación Psicoanalítica de América Latina FEPAL   (United States)

^e APsaA   (United States)

^f NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748342101     PISSN: 10481885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Abend, S. (1982), Serious illness in the analyst: Countertransference considerations. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 30:365-375.
2. - (1995), Discussion of Jay Greenberg's paper on self-disclosure. Contemp. Psychoanal., 31:207-211.
3. Boesky, D. (2003), Psychoanalytic controversies and clinical evidence: A model of clinical disputes. Paper presented at the New York Psychoanalytic Society, October, New York.
4. Busch, F. (1995), The Ego at the Center of Clinical Technique (chap. 1). Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
5. - (1996), The ego and its significance in analytic interventions. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 44:1073-1099.
6. Davies, J. M. (1994), Love in the afternoon: A relational reconsideration of desire and dread in the countertransference. Psychoanal. Dial. 4:153-170.
7. Dewald, P. A. (1982), Serious illness in the analyst: Transference and reality responses. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 30:347-363.
8. Eagle, M. N. (2003), The postmodern turn in psychoanalysis: A critique. Psychoanal. Psychol., 20:411-424.
9. -, Wolitzky, D. L. & Wakefield, J. C. (2001), The analyst's knowledge and autonomy: A critique of the "New View" in psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 49:453-488.
10. Edwards, N. (2002), The ailing analyst and the dying patient: A relational perspective. Paper presented at the Second Joint International Conference, Deaths and endings, finality, transformations, new beginnings. Trinity College, August, Dublin, Ireland.
11. - (2004), The ailing analyst and the dying patient: A relational perspective. Psychoanal. Dial. 14:313-335.
12. Freud, S (1912), The dynamics of transference. Standard Edition, 12:97-108. London: Hogarth Press, 1961.
13. Gray, P. (1994), The Ego and the Analysis of Defense (chap. 1 & 2). Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
14. Greenberg, J. & Mitchell, S. (1983), Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Grunes, M. (1984), The therapeutic object relationship. Psychoanal. Rev., 71:123-143.
16. - (1998), The therapeutic object relationship-II. In: The Modern Freudians: Contemporary Psychoanalytic Technique, eds. C. S. Ellman & S. Grand. Northvale, NJ: Aronson, pp. 129-140.
17. Hoffman, I. Z. (1983), The patient as interpreter of the analyst's experience. Contemp. Psychonal., 19:389-122.
18. Isakower, O. (1992), The analyzing instrument in the conduct of the analytic process. J. Clin. Psychoanal., 1:181-194, 1957.
19. Jacobs, T. (1999), On the question of self-disclosure by the analyst: Error or advance in technique? Psychoanal. Quart., 68:159-183.
20. Lasky, R. (1990a), Catastrophic illness in the analyst and the analyst's emotional reactions to it. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 71:455-473.
21. - (1990b), Keeping the analysis intact when the analyst has suffered a catastrophic illness. In: Illness and the Analyst, eds. H. Schwartz & A. Silver. New York: International Universities Press, pp. 177-198.
22. Loewald, H. (1960), On the therapeutic action of psycho-analysis. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 41:16-33.
23. Meissner, W. W. (1996), The Therapeutic Alliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24. - (2002), The problem of self-disclosure in psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 50:827-867.
25. Mitchell, S. A. (1988), The intrapsychic and the interpersonal: Different theories, different domains, or historical artifacts? Psychoanal. Inq., 8:472-496.
26. - (1993), Hope and Dread in Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.
27. - (1997), Influence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
28. Orange, D. M. & Stolorow, R. D. (1998), Self-disclosure from the perspective of intersubjectivity theory. Psychoanal. Inq., 18:530-537.
29. Pizer, B. (1997), When the analyst is ill: Dimensions of self-disclosure. Psychoanal. Quart., 66:450-469.
30. Renik, O. (1993), Analytic interaction: Conceptualizing technique in the light of the analyst's irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanal. Quart., 62:553-571.
31. - (1995), The ideal of the anonymous analyst and the problem of self-disclosure. Psychoanal. Quart., 64:466-495.
32. - (1996), The perils of neutrality. Psychoanal. Quart., 65:495-517.
33. - (1998a), The analyst's subjectivity and the analyst's objectivity. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 79:487-498.
34. - (1998b), Knowledge and Authority in the Psychoanalytic Relationship. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
35. - (1999), Playing one's cards face up in analysis: An approach to the problem of self-disclosure. Psychoanal. Quart., 68:521-539.
36. Smith, H. F. (1999), Subjectivity and objectivity in analytic listening. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 47:465-484.
37. Stolorow, R. D. & Atwood, G. E. (1992), Contexts of Being: The Intersubjective Foundations of Psychological Life. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
38. - (1997), Deconstructing the myth of the neutral analyst: An alternative from intersubjective systems theory. Psychoanal. Quart., 66:431-449.
39. -, Brandchaft, B. & Atwood, G. (1987), Psychoanalytic Treatment: An Intersubjective Approach. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.