Renewable energy systems: A societal and technological platform

Renewable Energy

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 329-341

  Polatidis, Heracles ^a   Haralambopoulos, Dias A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE AEGEAN   (Greece)

Author keywords

Decomposition analysis; Public participation; Renewable energy systems; Socio economics; Technology; Wind energy

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING; WIND POWER;

DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION; RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS;

RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING; WIND POWER;

DECISION ANALYSIS; DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; PLANNING SYSTEM; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION;

EID: 33748320816     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2006.02.016     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Regulatory Authority for Energy (RAE). Transactions report, January 2003-March 2004. http://www.rae.gr/K2/report2003.pdf. 2005 (in Greek).
2. Polatidis H., and Haralambopoulos D. Renewable energy sources planning & design: a multi-criteria approach. In: van den Bergh J.C.J.M., Bruinsma1 F.R., Vreeker R., and Idenburg A. (Eds). The Transition to renewable Energy: Theory and Practice (2006), Springer, Amsterdam in press.
3. Polatidis H., and Haralambopoulos D. Local renewable energy planning; A participatory multi-criteria approach. Energy Sources 26 (2004) 1253-1264
4. Upreti B.A., and van der Horst D. National renewable energy policy and local opposition in the UK: the failed development of a biomass electricity plant. Biomass Bioenergy 26 (2004) 61-69
5. Public Power Corporation (PPC). Geothermal power plants evaluation report. Athens. 1989 (in Greek).
6. Toke D. Explaining wind power planning outcomes: some findings from a study in England and Wales. Energy Policy 33 (2005) 1527-1539
7. Polatidis H, Haralambopoulos D, Bruinsma F, Vreeker R, Munda G. MCDA-RES: A Web-based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Software Tool-kit for Renewable Energy Projects. Submitted for publication to Environmental Modelling & Software, October 2005.
8. Madlener R, Myles H. Modelling socio-economic aspects of bioenergy systems-a survey prepared for IEA Bioenergy Task 29. www.iea-bioenergy-task29.hr. 2000.
9. Marttunen M., and Hamalainen R.P. Decision analysis interviews in environmental impact assessment. Euro J Operat Res 87 (1995) 551-563
10. Haralambopoulos D.A., and Polatidis H. Renewable Energy Projects: structuring a multi-criteria group decision-making framework. Rene Energy 28 (2003) 961-973
11. European Commission FP5/EESD project. Development and application of a multi-Criteria Software Decision Analysis Tool for renewable energy sources (MCDA-RES). http://www.exergia.net/mcda.
12. Ang B.W., and Zhang F.Q. A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies. Energy 25 (2000) 1149-1176
13. Domac J., Richards K., and Risovic S. Socio-economic drivers in implementing bioenergy projects. Biomass and Bioenergy 28 (2005) 97-106
14. Afgan N.H., Carvalho M.G., and Hovanov N.V. Energy system assessment with sustainability indicators. Energy Policy 28 (2000) 603-612
15. Keeney R., and Raiffa H. Decision with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs (1976), Wiley, New York
16. Brans J.P., Vincke P., and Mareschal B. How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. Euro J Operat Res 24 (1986) 228-238
17. Roy B., Present M., and Silhol D. A programming method for determining which Paris metro stations should be renovated. Euro J Operat Res 24 (1986) 318-334
18. Steuer R. Multiple criteria optimization: theory, computation and application (1986), Wiley, New York
19. Saaty T.L. The analytic hierarchy process (1980), McGraw-Hill, New York
20. Munda G. Multicriteria evaluation in a fuzzy environment. Theory and applications (1995), Ecol. Econ. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg
21. Lahdelma R., Hokkanen J., and Salminen P. SMAA-Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. Euro J Operat Res 106 (1998) 137-143
22. Rowe G., and Frewer L.J. Public Participation methods: A Framework for Evaluation. Sci Technol Human Values 25 (2000) 3-29
23. Halvorsen K.E. Assessing public participation techniques for comfort, convenience, satisfaction and deliberation. Environ Manage 28 (2001) 179-186
24. Hisschemoller M., Tol R.S.J., and Vellinga P. The relevance of participatory approaches in integrated environmental management. Integrat Assess 2 (2001) 57-72
25. Hobbs F., and Horn T.F. Building public confidence in energy planning; a multimethod MCDM approach to demand-side planning at BC gas. Energy Policy 25 (1997) 357-375
26. Alvarez-Farizo B., and Hanley N. Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms. An example from Spain. Energy Policy 30 (2002) 107-116