Power relations in urban decision-making: Neo-liberalism, 'techno-politicians' and authoritarian redevelopment in Santiago, Chile

Urban Studies

Volumn 43, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1825-1846

  Zunino, Hugo Marcelo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; LIBERALISM; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; POWER RELATIONS; REDEVELOPMENT; URBAN DEVELOPMENT;

CHILE; METROPOLITANA; SANTIAGO [METROPOLITANA]; SOUTH AMERICA;

EID: 33748320754     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: 1360063X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00420980600838184     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Acioly, C. (2001) Reviewing urban revitalisation strategies in Rio de Janeiro: From urban project to urban management approaches Geoforum, 32(4), pp. 509-520.
2. Adams, D. and Hastings, E. (2001) Assessing institutional relations in development partnerships: The Land Development Corporation and the Hong Kong government prior to 1997 Urban Studies, 38(9), pp. 1473-1492.
3. Basset, K. and Griffiths, R. and Smith, I. (2002) Testing governance: partnership, planning and conflict in waterfront regeneration Urban Studies, 39(10), pp. 1757-1775.
4. Borsdorf, A. and Hidalgo, R. (2004) Formas tempranas de exclusión residencial y el modelo de la ciudad cerrada en América Latina Revista de Geografía Norte Grande, 32(1), pp. 21-38.
5. Borsdorf, A. and Hidalgo, R. (2005) Los Mega-diseños residenciales vallados en las periferias de las metrópolis latinoamericanas y el advenimiento de un nuevo cocepto de cindad: Alcanes en base al caso de Santiago de Chile Scripta Nova, 194(3). (http://www.ub.es/geocrit/sn/ sn-194-03.htm)
6. Boyne, R. (1991) Power-knowledge and social theory: The systematic misinterpretation of contemporary French social theory in the work of Anthony Giddens. In Giddens' Theory of Structuration: A Critical Appreciation. (pp. 52-73). London: Routledge.
7. Cariola, C. and Lacabana, M. (2003) La metrópolis fragmentada: Caracas entre la pobreza y la marginalización Eure, 27(80), pp. 9-32.
8. Carruthers, D. (2001) Environmental politics in Chile: Legacies of dictatorship and democracy Third World Quarterly, 22(3), pp. 343-358.
9. Cavarozzi, M. (1992) Patterns of elite negotiation and confrontation in Argentina and Chile. In Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe. (pp. 208-236). Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
10. Child, J. (1997) Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure, organizations and environment: Retrospect and prospect Organization Studies, 18(1), pp. 43-76.
11. Ciccolella, P. (1999) Globalización y dualización en la región metropolitana de Buenos Aires: Grandes inversiones y reestructuración socio territorial en los años noventa Eure, 24(73), pp. 5-28.
12. Clegg, S. (1989) Frameworks of power. London: Sage.
13. Contreras, Y. (2004) Análisis preliminar de los proyectos Portal Bicentenario y Ribera Norte. In. Santiago Unpublished document
14. Cortes, I. (2005) Construcción social del territorio: Los límites de la gestión local en Pudahuel. Santiago Unpublished document
15. Dear, M. (1995) Prolegomena to modern urbanism. In Managing Cities: The New Urban Context. (pp. 27-44). Chichester: J. Wiley.
16. De Mattos, C. (1996) Eure, 22(65), pp. 39-60. Avances de la globalización y nueva dinámica metropolitana: Santiago de Chile, 1975-1995
17. De Mattos, C. (1998) Reestructuración, globalización, nuevo poder económico y territorio en el Chile de los noventa. In Globalización y territorio: Impactos y perspectiva. (pp. 42-70). Santiago: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
18. De Mattos, C. (1999) Santiago de Chile, globalización y expansión metropolitana: Lo que existía sigue existiendo Eure, 25(76), pp. 29-56.
19. De Mattos, C. (2003) Globalización y transformación metropolitana en el caso de Santiago. In Los nuevos modos de gestión de la metropolización. (pp. 27-56). Santiago: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
20. Dockemdorff, E. and Rodriguez, A. and Winchester, L. (2000) Santiago de Chile: Metropolization, globalization and inequity Environment & Urbanization, 12(1), pp. 171-183.
21. Elias, N. (2000) The Civilizing Process. Oxford: Blackwell.
22. Elkin, S. (1987) City and Urban Regimes in the American Republic. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
23. Foucault, M. (1979) The History of Sexuality. Volume 1: An Introduction. London: Guilford.
24. Foucault, M. (1980) Power and strategies. In Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings. (pp. 134-145). New York: Pantheon Books.
25. Foucault, M. (1982) The subject and power. In Michel Foucault, Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. (pp. 208-226). Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
26. Foucault, M. (1995) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
27. Galjart, B. and Silva, P. (1995) Knowledge, expertise and political power: Intellectual and technocrats in developing countries. In Designers and Development: Intellectuals in the Third World. (pp. 1-18). Leiden: Leiden University.
28. Giddens, A. (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. London: Macmillan.
29. Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30. Giddens, A. (1989) A reply to my critics. In Social Theory of Modern Society: Anthony Giddens and His Critics. (pp. 249-301). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Gregory, D. (1980) Human agency and human geography Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 6, pp. 1-18.
32. Gregory, D. (1985) Suspended animation: The stasis of diffusion theory. In Social Relations and Spatial Structures. (pp. 296-336). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
33. Gregson, N. (1987) On duality and dualism: The case of structuration and time geography Environment and Planning D, 5, pp. 184-205.
34. Gregson, N. (1989) On the (ir)relevance of structuration theory to empirical research. In Social Theory of Modern Society: Anthony Giddens and His Critics. (pp. 235-248). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Hall, T. and Hubbard, P. (1996) The entrepreneurial city: New urban politics, new urban geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 20(2), pp. 153-174.
36. Harvey, D. (1982) The Limits to Capital. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
37. Harvey, D. (1989a) The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell.
38. Harvey, D. (1989b) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism Geografiska Annaler, 71, pp. 3-17.
39. Hidalgo, R. (2004) De los pequeños condominios a la ciudad vallada: Las urbanizaciones cerradas y la nueva geografía social en Santiago de Chile Eure, 30(91), pp. 29-52.
40. Hidalgo, R. and Arenas, F. (2003) Los espacios metropolitanos chilenos en el periodo 1992-2002. In Los nuevos modos de gestión de la metropolización. (pp. 112-126). Santiago: Instituto de Geografía de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
41. Hidalgo, R. and Zunino, H. (2005) Expansión residencial en las comunas de las areas metropolitanos de Santiago y Valparaiso: Efectos socio-espaciales y lectura de las relaciones de poder entre los agentes urbanos (1992-2005). Unpublished manuscript, Proyecto Fondecyt
42. Hubbard, P. (1996) Urban design and city regeneration: Social representations of entrepreneurial landscapes Urban Studies, 33(8), pp. 1441-1461.
43. Keeling, D.(1999). Neoliberal reforms and landscape change in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers. In [pp. 15-32].
44. Kellerman, R. (1989) Structuration theory and attempts at integration in human geography The Professional Geographer, 39(9), pp. 267-274.
45. King, A. (1999) Against structure: A critique of morphogenic social theory The Sociological Review, 47(2), pp. 199-227.
46. Marcuse, P. (2000) No caos, sino muros: El postmodernismo y la ciudad compartimentada. In Lo Urbano. (pp. 45-78). Barcelona: Universitat Politécnica de Catalunya.
47. McGovern, S. (2003) Ideology, consciousness, and inner city redevelopment: The case of Stephen Goldsmith's Indianapolis Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(1), pp. 1-25.
48. Moos, A. and Dear, M. (1986) Structuration theory in urban analysis: 1. Theoretical exegesis Environment and Planning, 18, pp. 231-252.
49. Mouzelis, N. (1989) Restructuring structuration theory The Sociological Review, 37, pp. 613-635.
50. Nef, J. (2003) The Chilean model: Fact and fiction Latin American Research Perspectives, 30(5), pp. 16-40.
51. Ortiz, J. and Morales, S. (2002) Dimensiones latentes de la diferenciación del espacio social en una metrópolis latinoamericana: El caso del Gran Santiago Eure, 28(85), pp. 111-130.
52. Ostrom, E. (1986) An agenda for the study of institutions Public Choice, 48, pp. 3-24.
53. Outtes, J. (2003) Disciplining society through the city: The genesis of city planning in Brazil and Argentina Bulletin of Latin American Research, 22(2), pp. 137-164.
54. Parker, S. (2001a) Community, social identity and the structuration of power in contemporary European city. Part one: Toward a theory of urban structuration City, 5, pp. 189-202.
55. Parker, S. (2001b) Community, social identity and the structuration of power in contemporary European city. Part two: Power and identity in the urban community: A comparative analysis City, 5, pp. 281-308.
56. Philo, C. and Parr, H. (2000) Institutional geographies: Introductory remarks Geoforum, 31, pp. 513-521.
57. Phipps, A. (2000) A structurationist interpretation of community activism during school closures Environment and Planning A, 32, pp. 1807-1823.
58. Roberts, S. and Schein, R. (1993) The entrepreneurial city: Fabricating urban development in Syracuse, New York The Professional Geographer, 45(1), pp. 21-33.
59. Rodriguez, A. and Winchester, L. (2001) Santiago de Chile: metropolización, globalización, desigualdad Eure, 27(80), pp. 121-139.
60. Sabatini, F. (1997) Conflictos ambientales y desarrollo sustentable de las regiones urbanas Eure, 22(68), pp. 77-91.
61. Short, J. and Benton, L. and Luce, W. and Walton, J. (1993) Reconstructing the image of an industrial city Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 83(2), pp. 207-224.
62. Silva, E. (1995) Intellectuals, technocrats, and politics in Chile: From global projects to the 'management of things'. In Designers and Development: Intellectuals in the Third World. (pp. 190-212). Leiden: Leiden University.
63. Silva, E. (1996) The State and Capital in Chile: Business Elites, Technocrats, and Market Economics. Boulder CO: Westview Press.
64. Silva, P. (1998) Neoliberalism, democratization, and the rise of technocrats. In The Changing Role of the State in Latin America. (pp. 75-92). Boulder CO: Westview Press.
65. Soja, E. (2000) Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions. Oxford: Blackwell.
66. Steiner, R. (1976) The Philosophy of Liberty. Basel: Anthroposophical Press.
67. Stone, C. (1989) Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta 1946-1988. Lawrence KA: University Press of Kansas.
68. Storper, M. (1985) The spatial and temporal constitution of social action: A critical reading of Giddens Environment and Planning C, 3, pp. 407-424.
69. Taylor, L. (1998) Citizenship, Participation and Democracy: Changing Dynamics in Chile and Argentina. London: Macmillan.
70. Thompson, J. (1989) The structuration theory. In Social Theory of Modern Society: Anthony Giddens and His Critics. (pp. 56-76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71. Thrift, N. (1985) On the determination of social action in space and time Environment and Planning D, 1, pp. 23-57.
72. Valdés, J. (1995) Pinochet's Economist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. Ward, K. (1997) Coalition in urban regeneration: A regime approach Environment and Planning A, 29, pp. 1493-1506.
74. Ward, P. (1996) Contemporary issues in the government and administration of Latin America. In The Mega-city in Latin America. (pp. 53-72). New York: United Nations University Press.
75. Waterstone, M. (1995) Social theory, structuration and institutional analysis: Grounding theory and theorizing practice. Paper presented to Department of Geography, University of Oregon, November
76. Waterstone, M. (1996) A conceptual framework for institutional analysis of transboundary water resource management: Theoretical perspectives. In Transboundary Water Resource Management: Institutional and Engineering Approaches. (pp. 9-18). New York: Springer.
77. Zunino, H. (2004) Analytical and conceptual framework to study structures of governance and multi-level power relations in urban initiatives. PhD thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson
78. Zunino, H. (2005) Social theory at work: Analyzing multi-level power relations in the redevelopment of Concepción's riverfront Cidades, 2(4), pp. 315-342.