Polycentric phoenix

Economic Geography

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 167-192

  Leslie, Timothy F ^a   Óh Uallacháin, Breandán ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Point patterns; Polycentric; Spatial associations; Urban structure

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT; INDUSTRIAL LOCATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; URBAN SYSTEM;

EID: 33748307409     PISSN: 00130095     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2006.tb00295.x     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Abdel-Rahman, H. M. 1994. Economies of scope in intermediate goods and a system of cities. Regional Science and Urban Economics 24:497-524.
2. Advanced Planning Task Force. 1959. Land use of the Phoenix urban area: A study basic to long range planning. Phoenix: City of Phoenix and Maricopa County.
3. Alonso, W. 1964. Location and land use. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
4. Anas, A.; Arnott, R.; and Small, K. A. 1998. Urban spatial structure. Journal of Economic Literature 36:1426-64.
5. Anderson, N., and Bogart, W. 2001. The structure of sprawl: Identifying and characterizing employment centers in polycentric metropolitan areas. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 60:147-69.
6. Baerwald, T. 1978. Emergence of a new "downtown." Geographical Review 68:309-18.
7. Barff, R. A. 1987. Industrial clustering and the organization of production: A point pattern analysis of manufacturing in Cincinnati, Ohio. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77:89-103.
8. Bodenman, J. E. 1998. The suburbanization of the institutional investment advisory industry: Metropolitan Philadelphia, 1983-1993. The Professional Geographer 50:112-26.
9. Bogart, W. T., and Ferry, W. C. 1999. Employment centres in greater Cleveland: Evidence of evolution in a formerly monocentric city. Urban Studies 36:2099-110.
10. Brakman, S.; Garretsen, H.; van Marrewijk. C.; and van den Berg, M. 1999. The return of Zipf: Towards a further understanding of the rank-size distribution. Journal of Regional Science 39:183-213.
11. Brueckner, J. K. 2000. Urban sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies. International Regional Science Review 23:160-71.
12. Cervero, R., and Wu, K. 1997. Polycentrism, commuting, and residential location in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning A 29:865-86.
13. Cervero, R., and Wu, K. 1998. Sub-centering and commuting: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay area. Urban Studies 35:1059-76.
14. City of Scottsdale. 2005. Scottsdale Airport history. 10 September. Available online: http://www.ci.scottsdale.az.us/Airort/History.asp
15. Coffey, W. J.; Drolet, R.; and Polèse, M. 1996. The intrametropolitan location of high order services: Patterns, factors and mobility in Montreal. Papers in Regional Science 75:293-323.
16. Coffey, W. J., and Shearmur, R. 2002. Agglomeration and dispersion of high-order service employment in the Montreal metropolitan region, 1981-1996. Urban Studies 39:359-78.
17. Cuthbert, A., and Anderson, W. 2002. Using spatial statistics to examine the pattern of urban land development in Halifax-Dartmouth. The Professional Geographer 54:521-32.
18. Downs A. 1994. New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
19. Duany, A.; Playtey-Zyberk, E.; and Speck, J. 2000. Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. New York: North Point Press.
20. Erickson, R. A. 1986. Multinucleation in metropolitan economies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 76:331-46.
21. Feser, E. J., and Sweeney, S. H. 2000. A test for the coincident economic and spatial clustering of business enterprises. Journal of Geographical Systems 2:349-73.
22. Fujii, T., and Hartshorn, T. A. 1995. The changing metropolitan structure of Atlanta, Georgia: Locations of functions and regional structure in a multinucleated urban area. Urban Geography 16:680-707.
23. Gad, G. 1979, Face-to-face linkages and office decentralization potentials: A study of Toronto. In Spatial patterns of office growth and location, ed. P. W. Daniels, 277-323. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley and Sons.
24. Gad, G. 1999. Downtown Montreal and Toronto: Distinct places with much in common. Canadian Journal of Regional Science 22:142-47.
25. Gammage, G. 1999. Phoenix in perspective: Reflections on developing the desert. Tempe: Herberger Center for Design Excellence, College of Architecture and Environmental Design, Arizona State University.
26. Garreau, J. 1991. Edge city: Life on the new frontier. New York: Doubleday.
27. Giuliano, G., and Small, K. A. 1991. Subcenters in the Los Angeles region. Regional Science and Urban Economics 21:163-82.
28. Glaeser, E. L., and Kahn, M. E. 2003. Sprawl and urban growth. NBER Working Papers 9733, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.
29. Glasmeier, A. 1988. Factors governing the development of high tech industry, agglomerations: A tale of three cities. Regional Studies 15:287-301.
30. Goe, W. R.; Lentnek, B.; MacPherson, A.; and Phillips, D. 2000. The role of contact requirements in producer services location. Environment and Planning A 32:131-45
31. Gong, H., and Wheeler, J. O. 2002. The location and suburbanization of business and professional services in Atlanta. Growth and Change 33:341-69.
32. Gordon, P., and Richardson, H. W. 1996a. Beyond polycentricity: The dispersed metropolis, Los Angeles, 1970-1990. Journal of the American Planning Association 62:289-95.
33. Gordon, P., and Richardson, H. W. 1996b. Why sprawl is good. Cascade Policy Institute. 28 March. Available online: http://www.cascadepolicy.org/growtb/gordon.htm
34. Gordon, P., and Richardson, H. W. 1997. Are compact cities a desirable planning goal? Journal of the American Planning Association. 63:95-106.
35. Harrington, J. W., and Campbell, H. S. 1997. The suburbanization of producer service employment. Growth and Change 28:335-59.
36. Hartshorn, T. A., and Muller, P. O. 1989. Suburban downtowns and the transformations of metropolitan Atlanta's business landscape. Urban Geography 10:375-95.
37. Heim, C. E. 2001. Leapfrogging, urban sprawl, and growth management: Phoenix, 1950-2000. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 60:245-83.
38. Ihlanfeldt, K. R. 1995. The importance of the central city to the regional and national economy. A review of the arguments and empirical evidence. Cityscape 1:125-50.
39. Krugman, P. 1996. The self-organizing economy. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
40. Kunstler, J. H. 1993. The geography of nowhere: The rise and decline of America's man-made landscape. New York: Simon & Schuster.
41. Lee, J., and Wong, D. W. S. 2001. Statistical analysis with ArcView GIS. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
42. Marshall, A. 2001. How cities work: Suburbs, sprawl, and the roads not taken. Austin: University of Texas Press.
43. McDonald, J. F., and Prather, P. J. 1994. Suburban employment centers: The case of Chicago. Urban Studies 31:201-18.
44. McMillen, D. P. 2001. Polycentric urban structure: The case of Milwaukee. Economic Perspectives 25:15-27.
45. McMillen, D. P., and McDonald, J. F. 1998. Suburban subcenters and employment density in metropolitan Chicago. Journal of Urban Economics 43:157-80.
46. McMillen, D. P., and Smith, S. C. 2003. The number of subcenters in large urban areas. Journal of Urban Economics 53:321-38.
47. Mieszkowski, P., and Mills, E. S. 1993. The causes of metropolitan suburbanization. Journal of Economic Perspectives 7:135-47.
48. Mieszkowski, P., and Smith, B. A. 1991. Urban decentralization: The case of Houston. Regional Science and Urban Economics 21:183-99.
49. Mills, E. S., and Hamilton, B. W. 1994. Urban economics. New York: HarperCollins.
50. Mills, E. S., and Lubuele, L. S. 1997. Inner cities. Journal of Economic Literature 35:727-56.
51. Nelson, K. 1986. Labor demand, labor supply, and the suburbanization of low-wage office work. In Production, work and territory, ed. A. Scott and M. Storper, 149-71. Boston: Allen and Unwin.
52. Ó hUallacháin, B., and Reid, N. 1991. The location and growth of business and professional services in American metropolitan areas. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 81:254-70.
53. Ó hUallacháin, B., and Reid, N. 1992. The intrametropolitan location of services in the United States. Urban Geography 13:334-54.
54. O'Sullivan, A. 2003. Urban economics. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
55. Perry, M. J., and Mackun, P. J. 2001. Population change and distribution: 1990-2000. U.S. Census Bureau. 28 March. Available online: http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/c2kbr01-2.pdf
56. Pivo, G. 1990. The net of mixed beads: Suburban office development in six regions. Journal of the American Planning Associations 56:457-69.
57. Rex, T. R. 2000. Midtown, downtown form metro Phoenix core. Arizona Business 47:1-7.
58. Shearmur, R., and Coffey, W. J. 2002. A tale of four cities: Intra-metropolitan employment distribution in Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver and Ottawa-Hull, 1981-1996. Environment and Planning A 34:575-98.
59. Stanback, T. M. 1991. The new suburbanization: challenge to the central city. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
60. U.S. Department of Commerce. 2003. County business patterns, Arizona: 2001. 12 September 2005. Available online: http://www.census.gov/prod/ 2003pubs/01cbp/cbp014.pdf
61. U.S. Department of Commerce. 2004. Statistical abstract of the United States. 12 September 2005. Available online: http://www.census.gov/prod/ www/statisticalabstract-04.html