Effects of orthodontic treatment with fixed functional orthopaedic appliances on the condyle-fossa relationship in the temporomandibular joint: A magnetic resonance imaging study (Part I)

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 339-346

  Kinzinger, Gero S M ^a   Roth, A ^a   Gulden N ^a   Bucker A ^a   Diedrich, P R ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Condyle fossa relationship; fixed functional appliances; Magnetic resonance imaging; Orthodontic treatment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOINT CAVITY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORTHODONTICS; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISORDER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; TEMPORAL BONE; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISORDERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33748294724     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/53048233     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Sassouni V. A classification of skeletal facial types. Am J Orthod 1969; 55: 109-123.
2. Sassouni V. The Class II syndrome: differential diagnosis and treatment. Angle Orthod 1970; 40: 334-341.
3. McNamara Jr JA. Components of Class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod 1981; 51: 177-202.
4. Mintz SS. Craniomandibular dysfunction in children and adolescents: a review. Cranio 1993; 11: 224-231.
5. Ngan PW, Byczek E, Scheick J. Longitudinal evaluation of growth changes in Class II division 1 subjects. Semin Orthod 1997; 3: 222-231.
6. Pancherz H, Zieber K, Hoyer B. Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusions: a comparative study in children. Angle Orthod 1997; 67: 111-120.
7. Björk A. Variations in the growth of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res Suppl 1963; 42: 400-411.
8. Bishara SE, Jamison JE, Peterson LC, DeKock WH. Longitudinal changes in standing height and mandibular parameters between ages of 8 and 17 years. Am J Orthod 1981; 80: 115-135.
9. Behrents RG. Growth in the aging craniofacial skeleton. Monograph No. 17. Center for Human Growth and Development, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan; 1985.
10. Lewis AB, Roche AF. Late growth changes in the craniofacial skeleton. Angle Orthod 1988; 58: 127-135.
11. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint growth adaptation in Herbst treatment: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric roentgenographic study. Eur J Orthod 1998; 20: 375-388.
12. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint remodelling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment. A prospective longitudinal MRI and cephalometric roentgenographic investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 115: 607-618.
13. Kinzinger G, Ostheimer J, Förster F, Kwant P, Reul H, Diedrich P. Development of a new fixed functional appliance for treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion. First report. J Orofac Orthop 2002; 63: 384-399.
14. Herbst E. Dreißigjährige Erfahrungen mit dem Retentions-Scharnier. Zahnärztl Rundsch 1934; 43: 1515-1524.
15. Herbst E. Dreißigjährige Erfahrungen mit dem Retentions-Scharnier. Zahnärztl Rundsch 1934; 43: 1563-1568.
16. Herbst E. Dreißigjährige Erfahrungen mit dem Retentions-Scharnier. Zahnärztl Rundsch 1934; 43: 1611-1616.
17. Mavreas D, Athanasiou AE. Tomographic assessment of alterations of the temporomandibular joint after orthognathic surgery. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14: 3-15.
18. Vargas-Pereira MR. Quantitative Auswertung bildgebender Verfahren und Entwicklung einer neuen metrischen Analyse der Kiefergelenksstrukturen. Diss.med.dent. Kiel, 1997.
19. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York: Interscience Publications, 1940.
20. Richter F, Richter U, Küffer E, Keil V. Die Behandlung der Angle Klasse II mit dem Herbstscharnier unter Berücksichtigung der Auswirkungen auf das Kiefergelenk. Teil I: Untersuchungen zu Lageveränderungen der Fossa-Kondylus-Beziehung bei der Behandlung mit dem Herbstscharnier. Eine MRT-gestützte Auswertung. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 2001; 33: 69-85.
21. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Long-term TMJ effects of Herbst treatment; a clinical and MRI study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 114: 475-483.
22. Ruf S. Short- and long-term effects of the Herbst appliance on temporomandibular joint function. Semin Orthod 2003; 9: 74-86.
23. Pancherz H, Hansen K. Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Eur J Orthod 1986; 8: 215-228.
24. Richter U, Richter F. An MRI-monitored investigation of the condyle-fossa relationship during Herbst appliance treatment. Orthodontics 2004; 1: 43-51.