DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: A comparison of outcomes

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 117, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1720-1721

  Serletti, Joseph M ^a,b  

^a 10 Penn Tower ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL PAIN; DATA ANALYSIS; FAT NECROSIS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; NOTE; PEDICLED SKIN FLAP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUS ABDOMINIS MUSCLE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

EID: 33748294190     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000216294.23019.d0     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. Beasley, M. E. The pedicled TRAM as preference for immediate autogenous tissue breast reconstruction. Clin. Plast. Surg. 21: 191, 1994.
2. Serletti, J. M., and Moran, S. L. Free versus the pedicled TRAM flap: A cost comparison and outcome analysis. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 100: 1418, 1997.
3. Kroll, S. S. Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 106: 576, 2000.
4. Gill, P. S., Hunt, J. P., Guerra, A. B., et al. A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 113: 1153, 2004.