Quantitative measurements of regional lung ventilation using helium-3 MRI in a methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction model

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 611-616

  Mosbah, Karim ^a   Crémillieux, Yannick ^b   Adeleine, Patrice ^c   Dupuich, David ^b   Stupar, Vasile ^b   Nemoz, Chantal ^c   Canet, Emmanuelle ^a   Berthezène, Yves ^a,d  

^a LOUIS PRADEL HOSPITAL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^c HOSPICES CIVILS DE LYON   (France)

^d CROIX ROUSSE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Broncho constriction; Helium; Hyperpolarized gas; Lung functional imaging; MRI

Indexed keywords

HELIUM; METHACHOLINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BREATH HOLDING; BRONCHOSPASM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLOW RATE; GAS FLOW; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LUNG FUNCTION; LUNG VENTILATION; MEASUREMENT; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROVOCATION TEST; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RAT; SPIROMETRY;

ANIMALS; BRONCHOCONSTRICTOR AGENTS; HELIUM; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LASERS; LUNG; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETICS; MALE; METHACHOLINE CHLORIDE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33748262653     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20671     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Saam B, Yablonskiy DA, Gierada DS, Conradi MS. Rapid imaging of hyperpolarized gas using EPI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:507-514.
2. Wild JM, Paley MN, Kasuboski L, et al. Dynamic radial projection MRI of inhaled hyperpolarized 3He gas. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:991-997.
3. Gast KK, Puderbach MU, Rodriguez I, et al. Dynamic ventilation (3)He-magnetic resonance imaging with lung motion correction: gas flow distribution analysis. Invest Radiol 2002;37:126-134.
4. Salerno M, Altes TA, Brookeman JR, de Lange EE, Mugler 3rd JP. Dynamic spiral MRI of pulmonary gas flow using hyperpolarized (3)He: preliminary studies in healthy and diseased lungs. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:667-677.
5. Viallon M, Berthezene Y, Callot V, et al. Dynamic imaging of hyperpolarized (3)He distribution in rat lungs using interleaved-spiral scans. NMR Biomed 2000;13:207-213.
6. Durand E, Guillot G, Darrasse L, et al. CPMG measurements and ultrafast imaging in human lungs with hyperpolarized helium-3 at low field (0.1 T). Magn Reson Med 2002;47:75-81.
7. Riederer SJ, Tasciyan T, Farzaneh F, Lee JN, Wright RC, Herfkens RJ. MR fluoroscopy: technical feasibility. Magn Reson Med 1988;8:1-15.
8. Dupuich D, Berthezene Y, Clouet PL, Stupar V, Canet E, Cremillieux Y. Dynamic 3He imaging for quantification of regional lung ventilation parameters. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:777-783.
9. Colegrove FD, Shearer LD, Walters GK. Polarisation of 3He gas by optical pumping. Phys Rev 1963;132:2561-2572.
10. Happer W, Miron E, Scheafer S, van Wijngaarden WA, Zeng X. Polarisation of the nuclear spins of noble-gas atoms by spin exchange with optically pumped alkaly-metal atoms. Phys Rev A 1984;29:3092-3110.
11. Wagshul ME, Chupp TE. Optical pumping of high-density Rb with a broadband dye laser and GaAlAs diode laser arrays: application to 3He polarisation. Phys Rev A 1989;8:4447-4454.
12. Wagshul ME, Chupp TE. Laser optical pumping of high-density Rb in polarised 3He targets. Phys Rev A 1994;49:3854-3869.
13. Lauterbur PC. Image formation by induced local interactions: examples employing nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature 1973;242:190.
14. Cremilleux Y, Humblot H, Berthezene Y, et al. A combined proton perfusion/He3 ventilation NMR study in rat lungs. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:645-648.
15. Rasche V, de Boer RW, Holz D, Proksa R. Continuous radial data acquisition for dynamic MRI. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:754-761.
16. Petak F, Hantos Z, Adamicza A, Asztalos T, and Sly PD. Methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in rats: effects of intravenous vs. aerosol delivery. J Appl Physiol 1997;82:1479-1487.
17. Barnes PJ. Muscarinic receptor subtypes in airways. Eur Respir J 1993;6:328-331.
18. Chen BT, Johnson GA. Dynamic lung morphology of methacholine-induced heterogeneous bronchoconstriction. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:1080-1086.