Reading instruction in an integrated language perspective: Collaborative interaction in classroom curriculum genres

Instructional Models in Reading

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 283-310

  Pappas, Christine C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748262271     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (80)

1. Ackerman, D. B. (1989). Intellectual and practical criteria for successful curriculum integration. Tn H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Interdisciplinary! curriculum: Design and implementation (pp. 25-37). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press
3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press
4. Bloome, D., & Bailey, F. (1992). Studying language and literacy through events, particularity, and intertexmality. In R. Beach, J. Green, M. Kamil, & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Multiple disciplinary perspectives on language and literacy research (pp. 181-210). Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research in English
5. Bloome, D., St Egan-Robertson, A. (1993). The social construction of intertextuaiity in classroom reading and writing lessons. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 305-33.3
6. Cazden, C. B (1986). Classroom discourse, in M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 432-463). New York: Macmillan
7. Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
8. Cazden, C. B. (1992). Whole language plus: Essays on literacy in the United States and Neiv Zealand. New York: Teachers College Press
9. Christie, F. (1987). The morning news genre: Using a functional grammar to illuminate educational issues. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 182-198
10. Christie, F. (1989). Language development in education. In R, Hasan & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Language development: Learning language, learning culture (pp. 152-198). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
11. Christie, F. (1990). The changing face of literacy. In F. Christie (Ed.), Literacy for a changing world (pp. 1-25). Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research
12. Christie, F. (1993). Curriculum genres: Planning of effective teaching. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Thepoivers of literacy, A genre approach to teaching writing (pp. 154-178). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press
13. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/outside, Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press
14. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (1990). Literacy in the social sciences. In F. Christie (Ed.), Literacy for a changing world (pp. 118-142). Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research
15. Daiute, C. (1993). Youth genres and literacy: Links between sociocultural and developmental theories. Language Arts, 79,402-416
16. Daly, N. (1985). Not so fast Songololo. London: Penguin
17. Dickinson, D. K., & Smith, M. A. (1994). Long-term effects of preschool teachers' book readings on low-income children's vocabulary and story comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 104-122
18. Edwards, D., St Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge
19. Eeds, M., & Wells, D. (1989). Grand conversations: An exploration of meaning construction in literature study groups. Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 4-29
20. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman
21. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, England: Polity Press
22. Green, J. L., Kantor, R. M., & Rogers, T, (1991). Exploring the complexity of language and learning in classroom contexts. In L. Idol & B. F. Jones (Eds.), Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform (pp. 333-364). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Ertbaum Associates
23. Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning to mean: Explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold
24. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as a social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold
25. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Spoken and written language. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press
26. Halliday, M. A. K. (1987). Spoken and written modes of meaning. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and utritten language (pp. 55-82). San Diego, CA: Academic Press
27. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93-116
28. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). 'So you say 'pass'. thank you muchly' In A. D. Grimshaw (Ed.), What's going on here? Complementary studies of professional talk. Volume two of the multiple analysis project (pp. 175-229). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
29. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press
30. Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press
31. Hasan, R. (1985). The identity of the text. In M. A. K. Halliday & R. Hasan (Eds.), language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (pp. 97-116). Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press
32. Hasan, R. (1995). Tire conception of context in text. In P. H. Pries & M. Gregory (Eds.), Discourse in society. Systemic Junctional perspectives (pp. 183-283), Norwood, NJ: Ablex
33. Hymes, D. (1987). Communicative competence. In H. von U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, & K, j. Mattheier (Eds,), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society (pp. 219-229). New York: deGruyter
34. Isadora, R. (1991). At the crossroads. New York: Greenwillows
35. Jacobs, H. H. (1989). The growing need for interdisciplinary curriculum content. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation (pp. 1-11). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
36. Kreisberg, S. (1992). Transforming power: Domination, empowerment, and education. Albany: State University of New York Press
37. Kress, G. (1993). Genre as social process. In B, Cope St M. Kalanrzis (Eds ), The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing (pp. 22-37). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press
38. Lemke, J. L. (1985a). Using language in the classroom. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press
39. Lemke, J. I. (1985b). Ideology, intertextuality and the notion of register. In J. Benson St W
40. Greaves (Eds.), Systemic perspectives in discourse (pp. 275-294). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
41. Lemke, J. L
42. Martin, J. M. (1990). Literacy in science; Learning to handle text as technology. In F. Christie (Ed.), Literacy for a changing zvorld (pp. 79-117). Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research
43. Martin, J. M. (1992). English text: System and structure. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Martinez, M., & Teale, W. (1993). Teacher storybook reading style: A comparison of six teachers. Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 175-199
44. Moll, L. C. (Ed.). (1990). Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohisloricalpsychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
45. Mousley,J,& Marks, G. (1991) Discourses in mathematics. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press
46. Newkirk, T. (1989). More than stories.-The range of children's writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
47. Newntan, D. P., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
48. Nhuong, H. Q. (1982). The land I lost. Illustrated by V, Mai. New York: HarperCollins
49. Nystrand, M. (1986). The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity bettveen writers and readers, Orlando. FL: Academic Press
50. Nystrand, M. (1987). The role of contexL in written communication. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 197-213). San Diego, CA: Academic Press
51. Nystrand, M., & Wiemelt, J. (1991). When is a text explicit? Formalist and dialogical conceptions. Text, 11, 25-41
52. O'Connor. M. C, & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 24, 318-335
53. Olson, D. R. (1977), From utterance to text; The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257-281
54. Olson, D. R. (1991) Children's understanding of interpretation and the autonomy of written texts. Text, 11, 3-23
55. Oyler, C. J. (1993). Sharing authority in an urban first grade-Becoming literate, becoming bold. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL
56. Pappas, C. C. (1990, July). The readtng-aioud curriculum genre: Exploring text and teacher variation. Paper presented at the 17th International Systemic Congress, Stirling, Scotland
57. Pappas, C. C. (1991). Fostering full access to literacy by including information books. Language Arts, 68, 440-162
58. Pappas, C. C. (1991b, April). The reading-ahud curriculum genre: Book genre and teacher variation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL
59. Pappas, C. C. (199.3a). Is narrative primary? Some insights from kindergarteners' pretend readings of stories and information books. JRB: A Journal of Literacy, 25, 97-129
60. Pappas, C. C. (1993b), Questioning our ideologies about narrative and learning: Response to Egan. Linguistics and Education, 5, 157-164
61. Pappas, C. C. (1993c). Urban teachers' struggles in sharing power with their students: Exploring changes in literacy cumicidum genres. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL
62. Pappas, C. C. (in press). Learning written genres: A socio-scniiotic perspective. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press
63. Pappas, C. C., Kiefer, B. Z., & Levstik, L. S. (1995). An integrated language perspective in the elementary school: Theory into action (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman
64. Perkins, D. N. (1989). Selecting fertile themes for integrated learning. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation (pp. 25-37). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Dcvelopment
65. Ramirez, A, (1988). Analyzing speech acts. In J. L. Green & J. O. Marker (Eds.), Multiple perspective analyses of classroom discourse (pp. 135-163). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
66. Santa Barbara Classroom Discourse Group IDixon, C, de la Cruz.E., C.rccn, J., Lin, L, & Brandis, L.L (1992). Do you see what we see? The referential and intertextual nature of classroom life. Journal of Classroom interaction, 27, 29-36
67. Shuy, R. (1988). Identifying dimensions of classroom language. In J. L. Green & J. O. Harker (Eds.), Multiple perspective analyses of classroom discourse (pp, 115-134). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
68. Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. London: Oxford University Press
69. Slcvin, J. F. (1992). Genre as a social institution. In J. Trimmer & T. Warnock (Eds.). Understanding others: Cultural and cross-cultural studies and the teaching of literature (pp. 16-34). Urbana, II.: National Council of the Teachers of English
70. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, England: Cambridge UniversiLy Press
71. Vygotsky, L, S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
72. Vygotsky, I, S. (1978), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
73. Wells, G. (1986). The meaning makers. Children learning language and using language to learn. Portsmouth, NH: Hetnemann
74. Wells, G. (1994, April). Discourse as tool in the activity of learning and teaching. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA
75. Wells, G., & Chang-Wells, G. L, (1992). Constructing knowledge together: Classrooms as centeis of inquiry and literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
76. Wert sell, J. V. (1985). Vygotsfa,-and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
77. Wcrtsch, J. V, (1989). A sociocultural approach to mind. In W. Damon (Ed.), Child dciolopment today and tomorrow (pp. 14-33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
78. Wertsch, J. V. (1991)-Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
79. Williams, S. A. (1992). Working cotton. Illustrated by C. Byard. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace. Willinsky, J. (1990). The new literacy: Redefining reading and writing in the schools. New York: Routledge
80. Young, R. (1992). Critical theory and classroom talk. Clevedon. England: Multilingual Matters