Integrated duration-cost influence network for modelling risk impacts on construction tasks

Construction Management and Economics

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 861-868

  Poh, Y P ^a   Tah, J H M ^b  

^a LONDON SOUTH BANK UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Integrated duration cost influence network; Quantitative risk analysis; Risk factors; Risk modelling; Risk propagation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; COSTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RISK MANAGEMENT;

INTEGRATED DURATION-COST INFLUENCE NETWORK; QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS; RISK FACTORS; RISK MODELLING; RISK PROPAGATION;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

CONSTRUCTION; MODELING; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 33748200732     PISSN: 01446193     EISSN: 1466433X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01446190600658891     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Akintoye, A. S. and MacLeod, M. J. (1997) Risk analysis and management in construction. International Journal of Project Management, 15((1)), pp. 31-8.
2. APM (Association for Project Management).(1997). In PRAM: Project Risk Analysis and Management Guide. The APM Group.
3. Carr, R. I. (1993) Cost, schedule, and time variances and integration. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119((2)), pp. 245-65.
4. CIRIA (Construction Industry Research and Information Association).(1996). In Control of Risk: A Guide to the Systematic Management of Risk from Construction. London: CIRIA.
5. Flanagan, R. and Norman, G. (1993). In Risk Management and Construction. Oxford: Blackwell.
6. Hendrickson, C. T. and Au, T. (1989). In Project Management for Construction: Fundamental Concepts for Owners, Engineers, Architects, and Builders. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.
7. ICE and FIA (Institution of Civil Engineers and Faculty and Institute of Actuaries). (1998). In RAMP: Risk Analysis and Management for Projects. London: Thomas Telford.
8. Isidore, L. J. and Back, W. E. (2002) Multiple simulation analysis for probabilistic cost and schedule integration. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128((3)), pp. 211-19.
9. Kim, J. J.(1989) An object-oriented database management system approach to improve construction project planning and control. In. Urbana, USA: PhD thesis, University of Illinois.
10. Rao, G. and Grobler, F. (1995) Integrated analyses of cost risk and schedule risk. In Proceedings of the Second Congress on Computing in Civil Engineering. (pp. 1404-11). New York: ASCE.
11. Rasdorf, W. J. and Abudayyeh, O. Y. (1991) Cost' and schedule-control integration: Issues and needs. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 117((3)), pp. 486-502.
12. Tah, J. H. M. and Carr, V. (2000) A qualitative project risk assessment model using fuzzy logic. Construction Management and Economics, 18((4)), pp. 491-500.
13. Tah, J. H. M. and Carr, V. (2001) Knowledge-based approach to construction project risk management. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 15((3)), pp. 170-7.
14. Tah, J. H. M. and Thorpe, A. and McCaffer, R. (1994) A survey of indirect cost estimating in practice. Construction Management and Economics, 12((1)), pp. 31-6.
15. Teicholz, P. M.(1987) Current needs for cost control systems. In Project Controls: Needs and Solutions (Proceedings of Speciality Conference). (pp. 47-57). New York: ASCE.
16. Thompson, P. and Perry, J. (1992). In Engineering Construction Risks: A Guide to Project Risk Analysis and Risk Management. London: Thomas Telford.
17. Uher, T. E. and Toakley, A. R. (1999) Risk management in the conceptual phase of a project. International Journal of Project Management, 17((3)), pp. 161-9.
18. Vose, D.(1996). In Quantitative Risk Analysis: A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulation Modelling. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.