Prediction of necessity for coronary artery revascularization by adenosine contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

International Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 112, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 184-190

  Bernhardt, Peter ^a   Engels, Thomas ^a   Levenson, Benny ^b   Haase, Katrin ^a   Albrecht, Alexander ^b   Strohm, Oliver ^a  

^a St Gertrauden Hospital   (Germany)

^b Cardiac catheterization center   (Germany)

Author keywords

Coronary heart disease; Magnetic resonance imaging; Perfusion; Stress

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; GADODIAMIDE; GADOTERATE MEGLUMINE;

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY RECANALIZATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; FIRST PASS EFFECT; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART MUSCLE NECROSIS; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT CODING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLE SIZE;

ADENOSINE; AGED; COMORBIDITY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; VASODILATOR AGENTS;

EID: 33748192951     PISSN: 01675273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.08.050     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Knuesel P.R., Nanz D., Wyss C., et al. Characterization of dysfunctional myocardium by positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance: relation to functional outcome after revascularization. Circulation 108 (2003) 1095-1100
2. Klein C., Nekolla S.G., Bengel F.M., et al. Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography. Circulation 105 (2002) 162-167
3. Ansari M., Araoz P.A., Gerard S.K., et al. Comparison of late enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance and thallium SPECT in patients with coronary disease and left ventricular dysfunction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 6 (2004) 549-556
4. 1. Radiology 226 (2003) 138-144
5. Wagner A., Marholdt H., Holly T.A., et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet 361 (2003) 374-379
6. Keijer J.T., van Rossum A.C., Wilke N., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial perfusion in single-vessel coronary artery disease: implications for transmural assessment of myocardial perfusion. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2 (2000) 189-200
7. Schwitter J., Nanz D., Kneifel S., et al. Perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 103 (2001) 2230-2235
8. Ishida N., Sakuma H., Motoyasu M., et al. Noninfarcted myocardium: correlation between dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial MR imaging and quantitative coronary angiography. Radiology 229 (2003) 209-216
9. Chiu C.W., So N.M., Lam W.W., Chan K.Y., and Sanderson J.E. Combined first-pass perfusion and viability study at MR imaging in patients with non-ST segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: feasibility study. Radiology 226 (2003) 717-722
10. Kim R.J., Fieno D.S., Parish T.B., et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 100 (1999) 1992-2002
11. Wu E., Judd R.M., Vargas J.D., Klocke F.J., Bonow R.O., and Kim R.J. Visualisation of presence, location, and transmural extent of healed Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Lancet 357 (2001) 21-28
12. Rehwald W.G., Fieno D.S., Chen E.L., Kim R.J., and Judd R.M. Myocardial magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent concentrations after reversible and irreversible ischemic injury. Circulation 105 (2002) 224-229
13. Friedrich M.G., Schulz-Menger J., Strohm O., Dick A.J., and Dietz R. The diagnostic impact of 2D- versus 3D-left ventricular volumetry by MRI in patients with suspected heart failure. Magma 11 (2000) 16-19
14. Cerqueira M.D., Weissman N.J., Dilsizian V., et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105 (2002) 539-542
15. Scanion P.J., Faxon D.P., Audet A.M., et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 99 (1999) 2345-2357
16. Paetsch I., Jahnke C., Wahl A., et al. Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion. Circulation 110 (2004) 835-842
17. Wolff S.D., Schwitter J., Coulden R., et al. Myocardial first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter dose-ranging study. Circulation 110 (2004) 732-737
18. Lauerma K., Niemi P., Hänninen H., et al. Multimodality MR imaging assessment of myocardial viability: combination of first-pass and late contrast enhancement to wall motion dynamics and comparison with FDG PET-initial experience. Radiology 217 (2000) 729-736
19. Taylor A.J., Al-Saadi N., Abdel-Aty H., Schulz-Menger J., Messroghli D.R., and Friedrich M.G. Detection of acutely impaired microvascular reperfusion after infarct angioplasty with magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 109 (2004) 2080-2085
20. Sanstede J.J., Lipke C., Beer M., et al. Analysis of first-pass and delayed contrast-enhanced patterns of dysfunctional myocardium on MR imaging: use in the prediction of myocardial viability. Am J Roentgenol 174 (2000) 1737-1740
21. Hartnell G., Cerel A., Kamalesh M., et al. Detection of myocardial ischemia: value of combined myocardial perfusion and cineangiographic MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 163 (1994) 1061-1067
22. Klein M.A., Collier B.D., Hellman R.S., and Bamrah V.S. Detection of chronic coronary artery disease: value of pharmacologically stressed, dynamically enhanced turbo-fast low-angle shot MR images. Am J Roentgenol 161 (1993) 257-263
23. Walsh E.G., Doyle M., Lawson M.A., Blackwell G.G., and Pohost G.M. Multislice first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging on a conventional clinical scanner. Magn Reson Med 34 (1995) 39-47
24. Matheijssen N.A., Louwenburg H.W., van Rugge F.P., et al. Comparison of ultrafast dipyridamole magnetic resonance imaging with dipyridamole SestaMIBI SPECT for detection of perfusion abnormalities in patients with one-vessel coronary artery disease: assessment by quantitative model fitting. Magn Reson Med 35 (1996) 221-228
25. Lauerma K., Virtanen K.S., Sipila L.M., Hekali P., and Aronen H.J. Multislice MRI in assessment of myocardial perfusion in patients with single-vessel proximal left anterior descending coronary artery disease before and after revascularization. Circulation 96 (1997) 2859-2867
26. Panting J.R., Gatehouse P.D., Yang G.Z., et al. Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular resonance imaging. N Engl J Med 346 (2002) 1948-1953
27. Keijer J.T., van Rossum A.C., van Eenige M.J., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of regional myocardial perfusion in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease: quantitative comparison with (201)Thallium-SPECT and coronary angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging (2000) 607-615
28. Hartnell G., Cerel A., Kamalesh M., et al. Detection of myocardial ischemia: value of combined myocardial perfusion and cineangiographic MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163 (1994) 1061-1067