TRIO and upward bound: History, programs, and issues - Past, present, and future

Journal of Negro Education

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 373-380

  McElroy, Edward J ^a   Armesto, Maria ^a  

^a American Federation of Teachers   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748174187     PISSN: 00222984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2668137     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. American Federation of Teachers. (1995). Principles for professional development: AFT's guidelines for creating professional development programs that make a difference. Washington, DC: Author.
2. American Federation of Teachers. (1998). Building on the best, learning from what works: Six promising schoolwide reform programs, Washington, DC: Author.
3. Amos, W. E., & Grambs, J. D. (Eds.). (1968). Counseling the disadvantaged youth. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4. Burkheimer, G. J., Riccobono, J., & Wisenbaker, J. (1979). Evaluation study of the Upward Bound programs: A second follow-up (Final Report). Durham, NC: Research Triangle Institute, Center for Educational Research and Evaluation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 186 574)
5. Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
6. Fashola, O. S., & Slavin, R. E. (1997). Effective dropout prevention and college attendance programs for students placed at risk. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University, Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk.
7. Franklin, J. E. (1984). A program evaluation of the Tennessee State University Upward Bound program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
8. Hexter, H. (1990, May). A description of federal information and outreach programs and selected state, institutional and community models. Paper presented at an Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance symposium on "Information Resources Services and Programs," Washington, DC.
9. Kendrick, S. A., & Thomas, C. L. (1970). Transition from school to college. Review of Educational Research 40(1), 151-179.
10. Levin, H. M. (1986). Educational reform for disadvantaged students: An emerging crisis. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
11. Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. (1997a). The national evaluation of Upward Bound - A 1990's view of Upward Bound: Programs offered, students served, and operational issues (Executive Summary). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
12. Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. (1997b). The national evaluation of Upward Bound: Short-term impacts of Upward Bound (Interim Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
13. National Center for Education Statistics. (1999a). Status of education reform in public elementary and secondary schools: Teachers' perspectives. Washington, DC: Author.
14. National Center for Education Statistics. (1999b). Teacher quality: A report on the preparation and qualifications of public school teachers. Washington, DC: Author.
15. Thomas, C. L. (1970). The current status of special collegiate programs for non-traditional students. Paper prepared for the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
16. Wolanin, T. R. (1996, December). The history of TRIO: Three decades of success and counting. Speech presented at the annual meeting of the board of directors of the National Council of Educational Opportunity Associations.
17. Young, E. E., & Exum, H. A. (1982). Upward Bound and academic achievement: A successful intervention. Journal of College Student Personnel, 1, 219-229.