Mechanical interactions of an implant/tooth-supported system under different periodontal supports and number of splinted teeth with rigid and non-rigid connections

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 34, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 682-691

  Lin, Chun Li ^a   Chang, Shih Hao ^b   Wang, Jen Chyan ^c   Chang, Wen Jen ^d  

^a CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d TA HWA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Connectors; Finite element analysis; Periodontal support; Splinting

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL CARE; EDENTULOUSNESS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; JAW; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; PERIODONTIC DEVICE; PHYSIOLOGY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PERIODONTAL SPLINTS; TOOTH MOBILITY;

EID: 33748171486     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.12.011     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ericsson I. The combined effects of plaque and physical stress on periodontal tissues. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 13 (1986) 918-922
2. Gunne J., Astrand P., Ahlen K., Borg K., and Olsson M. Implants in partial edentulous patients: a longitudinal study of bridges supported by natural teeth. Clinical Oral Implants Research 3 (1992) 49-56
3. Naert I., Quirynen M., van S.D., and Darius P. A six-year prosthodontic study of 509 consecutively inserted implants for the treatment of partial edentulism. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 67 (1992) 236-245
4. Olsson M., Gunne J., Astrand P., and Borg K. Bridges supported by free-standing implants versus bridges supported by tooth and implant. A five-year prospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 6 (1995) 114-121
5. Naert I.E., Ducky J.A.J., Honsy M.M.F., and van Steenberghe D. Freestanding and tooth-implant connected prostheses in the treatment of partially edentulous patients. Part I. An up to 15-years radiographic evaluation. Clinical Oral Implant Research 12 (2001) 237-244
6. Naert I.E., Ducky J.A.J., Honsy M.M.F., Quirynen M., and van Steenberghe D. Freestanding and tooth-implant connected prostheses in the treatment of partially edentulous patients. Part II. An up to 15-years radiographic evaluation. Clinical Oral Implant Research 12 (2001) 245-251
7. Pesun I.J. Intrusion of teeth in the combination implant-to-natural-tooth fixed partial denture: a review of the theories. Journal of Prosthodontics 6 (1997) 268-277
8. Nishimura R.D., Ochiai K.T., Caputo A.A., and Jeong C.M. Photoelastic stress analysis of load transfer to implants and natural teeth comparing rigid and semirigid connectors. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 81 (1999) 696-703
9. McGlumphy E.A., Campagni W.V., and Peterson L.J. A comparison of the stress transfer characteristics of a dental implant with a rigid or a resilient internal element. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 62 (1989) 586-593
10. Mathews M.F., Breeding L.C., Dixon D.L., and Aquilino S.A. The effect of connector design on cement retention in an implant and natural tooth-supported fixed partial denture. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 65 (1991) 822-827
11. Kay H. Free-standing versus implant-tooth-interconnected restorations: understanding the prosthdontic perspective. International Journal of Periodontal Restorative Dentistry 13 (1993) 47-69
12. Gross M., and Laufer B.Z. Splinting osseointegrated implants and natural teeth in rehabilitation of partially edentulous patients. Part 1. Laboratory and clinical studies. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 24 (1997) 863-870
13. Nyman S.R., and Lang N.P. Tooth mobility and the biological rationale for splinting teeth. Journal of Periodontology 2000 4 (1994) 15-22
14. Yang H.S., Chung H.J., and Park Y.J. Stress analysis of a cantilevered fixed partial denture with normal and reduced bone support. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 76 (1996) 424-430
15. Wang C.H., Lee H.E., Wang C.C., and Chang H.P. Methods to improve a periodontally involved terminal abutment of a cantilever fixed partial denture-a finite element stress analysis. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 25 (1998) 253-257
16. Wylie R.S., and Caputo A.A. Fixed cantilever splints on teeth with normal and reduced periodontal support. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 66 (1991) 737-742
17. Yang H.S., Lang L.A., and Felton D.A. Finite element stress analysis on the effect of splinting in fixed partial dentures. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 81 (1999) 721-728
18. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 49 (1983) 843-848
19. Monteith B.D. Minimizing biomechanical overload in implant prostheses: a computerized aid to design. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 69 (1993) 495-502
20. Lin C.L., and Wang J.C. Nonlinear finite element analysis of a splinted implant with various connectors and occlusal forces. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 18 (2003) 341-350
21. Dar F.H., Meakin J.R., and Aspden R.M. Statistical methods in finite element analysis. Journal of Biomechanics 35 (2002) 1155-1161
22. Versluis A., Tantbirojn D., and Douglas W.H. Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin?. Journal of Dental Research 76 (1997) 1298-1307
23. Lin C.L., Chang C.H., and Ko C.C. Multifactorial analysis of an MOD restored human premolar using auto-mesh finite element approach. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 28 (2001) 576-585
24. Lin C.L., Wang J.C., and Kuo Y.C. Numerical simulation on the biomechanical interactions of tooth/implant-supported system under various occlusal forces with rigid/non-rigid connections. Journal of Biomechanics 39 (2006) 453-463
25. Lin C.L., Chang C.H., Cheng C.S., Wang C.H., and Lee H.E. Automated finite element mesh generation for maxillary second premolar. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 59 (1999) 187-195
26. Tada S., Stegaroiu R., Kitamurs E., Miyakawa O., and Kusakari H. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 18 (2003) 357-368
27. van Rossen I.P., Braak L.H., de Putter C., and de Groot K. Stress-absorbing elements in dental implants. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 64 (1990) 198-205
28. Weinberg L.A., and Kniger B. Biomechanical considerations when combining tooth-supported and implant-supported prostheses. Oral surgery, Oral Medicine, and Oral Pathology 78 (1994) 22-27
29. Carr A.B., and Laney W.R. Maximum occlusal force levels in patients with osseointegrated oral implant prostheses and patients with complete dentures. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2 (1987) 101-108
30. Richter E.J. In vivo vertical forces on implants. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 10 (1995) 99-108
31. Rangert B., Gunne J., and Sullivan D.Y. Mechanical aspects of a Branemark implant connected to a natural tooth: an in vitro study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 6 (1991) 177-186
32. Toms S.R., Dakin G.J., Lemons J.E., and Eberhardt A.W. Quasi-linear viscoelastic behavior of the human periodontal ligament. Journal of Biomechanics 35 (2002) 1411-1415
33. Middleton J., Jones M., and Wilson A. The role of the periodontal ligament in bone modeling: the initial development of a time-dependent finite element model. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 109 (1996) 155-162
34. Provatidis C.G. A comparative FEM-study of tooth mobility using isotropic and anisotropic models of the periodontal ligament. Finite Element Method. Medical Engineering and Physics 22 (2000) 359-370
35. Yoshida N., Koga Y., Peng C.L., Tanaka E., and Kobayashi K. In vivo measurement of the elastic modulus of the human periodontal ligament. Medical Engineering and Physics 23 (2001) 567-572
36. Carter D.R., and Hayes W.C. Compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A 59 (1977) 954-962
37. Benzing U.R., Gall H., and Weber H. Biomechanical aspects of two different implant-prosthetic concepts for edentulous maxillae. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 10 (1995) 188-198
38. Jones M.L., Hickman J., Middletion J., Knox J., and Volp C. A validated finite element method study of orthodontic tooth movement in the human subject. Journal of Orthodontics 28 (2001) 29-38
39. Stegaroiu R., Kusakari H., Nishiyama S., and Miyakawa O. Influence of prosthesis material on stress distribution in bone and implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 13 (1998) 781-790
40. Haraldson T., Carlson G., and Ingervall B. Functional state, bite force and postural-al muscle activity in patients with oral implant bridges. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 37 (1979) 195-206
41. Sahin S., Cehreli M.C., and Yalcin E. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses-a review. Journal of Dentistry 30 (2002) 271-282
42. Haraldson T., and Carlson G. Bite force and function in patients with osseointegrated oral implants. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 85 (1977) 200-208
43. Natali A.N. Dental Biomechanics 26 (2003), Taylor & Francis, INC, New York