Generosity, anonymity, gender

Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 42-49

  Dufwenberg, Martin ^b   Muren, Astri ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Anonymity; Discrimination; Gender; Generosity; Social distance

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748163934     PISSN: 01672681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2004.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Andreoni J., and Vesterlund L. Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2001) 293-312
2. Ben-Ner A., Kong F., and Putterman L. Share and share alike? Gender-pairing, personality, and cognitive ability as determinants of giving. Journal of Economic Psychology 25 (2004) 581-589
3. Bogardus E.S. Immigration and Race Attitudes (1928), Heath, Boston
4. Bohnet I., and Frey B. Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games: comment. American Economic Review 89 (1999) 335-339
5. Bohnet I., and Frey B. The sound of silence in prisoner's dilemma and dictator games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 38 (1999) 43-57
6. Bolton G., and Katok E. An experimental test for gender differences in beneficent behavior. Economics Letters 48 (1995) 287-292
7. Bolton G., Katok E., and Zwick R. Dictator game giving: rules of fairness versus acts of kindness. International Journal of Game Theory 27 (1998) 269-299
8. Charness, G., Gneezy, U. What's in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, in press.
9. DeGroot M.H. Probability and Statistics (1975), Addison-Wesley, Reading
10. Dufwenberg, M., Muren, A., 2002. Discrimination by gender and social distance. Working Paper 2002:2. Department of Economics, Stockholm University.
11. Eckel C., and Grossman P. Are women less selfish than men? Evidence from dictator experiments. Economic Journal 108 (1998) 726-735
12. Eckel C., and Grossman P. Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Economic Inquiry 39 (2001) 171-188
13. Fershtman C., and Gneezy U. Discrimination in a segmented society: An experimental approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2001) 351-377
14. Forsythe R., Horowitz J., Savin N., and Sefton M. Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior 6 (1994) 347-369
15. Frohlich N., Oppenheimer J., and Moore B. Some doubts about measuring self-interest using dictator experiments: the costs of anonymity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 46 (2000) 271-290
16. Frohlich N., Oppenheimer J., and Kurki A. Modeling other-regarding preferences and an experimental test. Public Choice 119 (2004) 91-117
17. Hoffman E., McCabe E., Shachat K., and Smith V. Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior 7 (1994) 346-380
18. Hoffman E., McCabe E., and Smith V. Social distance and other-regarding behavior in bargaining games. American Economic Review 86 (1996) 653-660
19. Holm H.J. Gender based focal points. Games and Economic Behavior 32 (2000) 292-314
20. Holm, H.J., Engseld, P., 2001. Choosing bargaining partners-an experimental study on the impact of information about income and gender. Working Paper 2001:10. Department of Economics, Lund University.
21. Johannesson M., and Persson B. Non-reciprocal altruism in dictator games. Economics Letters 69 (2000) 137-142
22. Juvonen J., and Murdock T.B. How to promote social approval: Effects of audience and achievement outcome on publicly communicated attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology 85 (1993) 365-376
23. In: Kazdin A. (Ed). Encyclopedia of Psychology (2000), Oxford University Press, New York
24. Rege M., and Telle K. The impact of social approval and framing on cooperation in public good situations. Journal of Public Economics 88 (2004) 1625-1644
25. Roth A. Bargaining experiments. In: Kagel J., and Roth A.E. (Eds). Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995), Princeton University Press, Princeton 253-348
26. Shogren J. Fairness in bargaining requires a context: an experimental examination of loyalty. Economics Letters 31 (1989) 319-323
27. Siegel S., and Castellan Jr. H.J. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (1988), McGraw Hill, New York