Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation in Portuguese native dog breeds: diversity and phylogenetic affinities

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 97, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 318-330

  Pires, Ana Elisabete ^a,b   Ouragh, Lahoussine ^c   Kalboussi, Mohsen ^d   Matos, José ^b   Petrucci Fonseca, Francisco ^a   Bruford, Michael W ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^b INETI   (Portugal)

^c INSTITUT AGRONOMIQUE ET VÉTÉRINAIRE HASSAN II   (Morocco)

^d FACULTÉ DES SCIENCES DE TUNIS   (Tunisia)

^e CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA FRAGMENT; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ARTICLE; BREED; DNA SEQUENCE; DOG; DOMESTIC ANIMAL; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GEOGRAPHY; HAPLOTYPE; INTROGRESSION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; DOGS; EMIGRATION AND IMMIGRATION; FEMALE; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GEOGRAPHY; HAPLOTYPES; MOROCCO; PHYLOGENY; PORTUGAL; SPAIN; TUNISIA; VARIATION (GENETICS);

ANIMALIA; CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 33748142822     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: 14657333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esl006     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Alpoim JA. 1999. O Rafeiro do Alentejo. Monografia da Raça [Alentejo Shepherd Dog. Breed monography]. Monforte, Portugal: Câmara Municipal de Monforte.
2. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403-10.
3. Amaral AJ, Veiga V. 2004. O Cão de Fila de S. Miguel [The Azores cattle dog]. Vila Franca do Campo, Portugal: Câmara Municipal de Vila Franca do Campo.
4. Amaro A. 2001. Contribuição para a Caracterizaç ão da Estrutura Genética de Racxas Caninas Autóctones Portuguesas. Estudo do Grupo de Ligação da Transferrina em Raças Caninas Tipo Mastim [Contribution to the genetic characterization of the Portuguese autochthonous dog breeds. Study of transferrin ligation group in mastiff type breeds] [MSc dissertation]. Porto, Portugal: Universidade do Porto.
5. Avise JC. 2004. Molecular markers, natural history and evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
6. Bandelt H-J, Forster P, Röhl A. 1999. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 16:37-48.
7. Bannash DL, Bannash MJ, Ryun JR, Famula TR, Peterson NC. 2005. Y chromosome haplotype analysis in purebred dogs. Mamm Genome 16:273-80.
8. Braga PD. 2000. História dos Cães em Portugal. Das Origens a 1800 [Dogs' history in Portugal from origin to 1800]. Lisboa, Portugal: Hugin Editores, Lda.
9. Brito RS, Fabião C, Macías S, Mattoso J, Torres C. 1992. História de Portugal. Antes de Portugal [History of Portugal. Before Portugal]. Volume 1. Lisboa, Portugal: Círculo de Leitores, Lda and Authors.
10. Bruford MW, Bradley DG, Luikart G. 2003. DNA markers reveal the complexity of livestock domestication. Nat Rev Genet 4:900-10.
11. Cardoso JL. 2002. Pré-História de Portugal [Pre-history of Portugal]. Lisboa, Portugal: Editorial Verbo.
12. Clutton-Brock J. 1984. Dog. In: Mason IL, editor. Evolution of domesticated animals. London, UK: Longman.
13. Coppinger R, Coppinger L. 2002. Dogs: a new understanding of canine origin, behavior, and evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (Trd).
14. Cymbron T, Loftus RT, Malheiro MI, Bradley DG. 1999. Mitochondrial sequence variation suggests an African influence in Portuguese cattle. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266:597-603.
15. Excoffier L, Smouse P, Quattro JM. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479-91.
16. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-91.
17. Fondon JW III, Garner HR. 2004. Molecular origins of rapid and continuous morphological evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:18058-63.
18. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA. 2002. Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Geraldes AD. 1996. Brandas e inverneiras: particularidades do sistema agro-pastoril crastejo [Particularities of the Castro Laboreiro's agricultural and pastoral system]. Lisbon, Portugal: Instituto da Conservação da Natureza/Parque Nacional da Peneda-Gerês.
20. Giudicelli B. 1975. Situation Actuelle du Sloughi en Algerie [PhD dissertation]. Lyon, France: Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire.
21. Gomes MS. 2003. Raças Caninas Autóctones Portuguesas. Contributo para o seu Estudo Genético e Demográfico [Portuguese autochthonous dog breeds. A contribution to their genetic and demographic study] [Licenciatura dissertation]. Santarém, Santarém: Escola Superior Agrária de Santarém.
22. Graur D, Li W-H. 2000. Fundamentals of molecular evolution. 2nd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
23. Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol 22:160-74.
24. Hillis DM, Bull JJ. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol 42:182-92.
25. Hoelzel AR, Hancock JM, Dover GA. 1991. Evolution of the cetacean mitochondrial D-Loop region. Mol Biol Evol 8:475-93.
26. Hudson RR, Boos DD, Kaplan N. 1992. A statistical test for detecting geographic subdivision. Mol Biol Evol 9:138-51.
27. ICN, 1997. Conservação do lobo em Portugal [Wolf conservation in Portugal]. Lisboa, Portugal: Instituto da Conservaç ão da Natureza. 231 p.
28. Jordana J, Manteca X, Ribo O. 1999. Comparative analysis of morphological and behavioral characters in the domestic dog and their importance in the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships in canids. Genet Mol Biol 22:49-57.
29. Kim KS, Seong EL, Jeong HW, Ha JH. 1998. The complete nucleotide sequence of the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) mitochondrial genome. Mol Phylogenet Evol 10:210-20.
30. Lorenz K. 1975. Foreword. In: Fox MW, editor. The wild canids: their systematics, behavioural ecology and evolution. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
31. Mannion AM. 1999. Domestication and the origins of agriculture: an appraisal. Prog Phys Geogr 23:37-56.
32. Martín PG, Angioni G, Raverdy Ch, Ojanen U, Estébanez NL, Martínez BG, Chamorro GV, Lenberg JG, Ilera FA, Alonso AC, Albaladejo PF, Bernal AM, Toledo AA, Díez LM, Canada AM, García MM, Pascual MR, Cardoso JJ. 1994. Por los Caminos de la Trashumancia [On the Tanshumance paths]. Léon, Spain: Junta de Castilla y Léon.
33. McDonald DW, Carr GM. 1995. Variation in dog society: between resource dispersion and social flux. In: James Serpell, editor. The domestic dog: its evolution, behaviour and interactions with people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 199-216.
34. Miguil A. 1986. Contribution a l'étude du Sloughi au Maroc [PhD dissertation]. Rabat, Morocco: Institut Agronomique et Veterinaire Hassan II.
35. Molinari C. 1989. El Cao de Aguas Portugues. Um perro pescador [The Portuguese Water dog. A fisher dog]. La Revista del Perro No. 29. Madrid, Spain: Ediciones Guau, SA.
36. Molinari C. 1993. The Portuguese Water dog. 1st ed. Mafra, Portugal: Author.
37. Neff MW, Robertson KR, Wong AK, Safra N, Broman KW, Slatkin M, Mealey KL, Pedersen NC. 2004. Breed distribution and history of canine mdr1-1Δ, a pharmacogenetic mutation that marks the emergence of breeds from the collie lineage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:11725-30.
38. Okumura N, Ishiguro N, Nakano M, Matsui A, Sahara M. 1996. Intra- and interbreed genetic variations of mitochondrial DNA major non-coding regions in Japanese native dog breeds (Canis familiaris). Anim Genet 27:397-405.
39. Olivier M, Breen M, Binns MM, Lust G. 1999. Localization and characterization of nucleotide sequences from the canine Y chromosome. Chromosome Res 7:223-33.
40. Ostrander EA, Comstock KE. 2004. The domestic dog genome. Curr Biol 14:R98-9.
41. Ouar F. 1994. Contribution a l'étude de la situation du chien de l'Atlas: répartition géographique, écologie et caractéristiques morphométriques [PhD dissertation]. Rabat, Morocco: Institut Agronomique et Veterinaire Hassan II.
42. Parker HG, Kim LV, Sutter NB, Carlson S, Lorentzen TD, Malek TB, Johnson GS, DeFrance HB, Ostrander EA, Kruglyak L. 2004. Genetic structure of the purebred domestic dog. Science 304:1161-4.
43. Petit E, Ballou F, Excoffier L. 2002. Mammalian population genetics: why not Y? Trends Ecol Evol 17:28-33.
44. Petrucci-Fonseca F, Pires AE, Ribeiro S, Almendra L, Clemente A, Collaço MT, Matos J, Simões F. 2000. Cães de gado e a conservação do lobo em Portugal [Livestock guarding dogs and wolf conservation in Portugal]. Galemys 12:135-48.
45. Posada D. 2000. Testing geographic association - Chiperm. Version 1.2. Provo, UT: Department of Biology, Brigham Young University.
46. Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-8.
47. Ribeiro A, Saraiva JH. 2004. História de Portugal. A Formação do Território - da Lusitânia ao Alargamento do País [History of Portugal. Territory formation - from Lusitania to country expansion]. Matosinhos, Portugal: Quidnovi®.
48. 2 and the problem of small samples. Mol Biol Evol 6:539-45.
49. Roger L, Boxshall G, Clark P. 1998. A dictionary of ecology, evolution and systematics. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50. Sambrook J, Russel DW. 2001. Molecular cloning - a laboratory manual. 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
51. Savolainen P, Zhang YP, Luo J, Lundeberg J, Leitner T. 2002. Genetic evidence for an East Asian origin of domestic dogs. Science 298:1610-3.
52. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L. 2000. Arlequin version 2.000: a software for population genetics data analysis. Geneva, Switzerland: Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva.
53. Shields GF, Kocher TD. 1991. Phylogenetic relationships of North American ursids based on analysis of mitochondrial DNA. Evolution 45:218-21.
54. Silva RF. 2000. Transumância no Portugal central: diversidade e organização do território [Transhumance in central Portugal: diversity and land organization]. In: Associação da defesa do património Arouquense, editor. Montemuro - a última rota da tansumância. Arouca: Associação da defesa do património Arouquense, Escola Superior Agrária de Viseu. p 55-69.
55. Southern SO, Southern PJ, Dizon AE. 1988. Molecular characterization of a cloned dolphin mitochondrial genome. J Mol Evol 28:32-42.
56. Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
57. Tamura K, Nei M. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 10:512-26.
58. Tanabe Y, Ôta K, Ito S, Hashimoto Y, Sung YY, Ryu JK, Faruque MO. 1991. Biochemical-genetic relationships among Asian and European dogs and the ancestry of the Japanese native dog. J Anim Breed Genet 108:455-78.
59. Tsuda K, Kikkawa Y, Yonekawa H, Tanabe Y. 1997. Extensive interbreeding occurred among multiple matriarchal ancestors during the domestication of dogs: evidence from inter- and intraspecies polymorphisms in the D-loop region of mitochondrial DNA between dogs and wolves. Genes Genet Syst 72:229-38.
60. Vasconcelos RC. 1995. Raças de Cães Portugueses [Portuguese dog breeds]. 2nd ed. Lisboa, Portugal: Editorial Presença.
61. Veiga V. 2001. O Podengo Português [Portuguese Warren hound breed]. Lisboa, Portugal: Author.
62. Vilà C, Amorim IR, Leonard JA, Posada D, Castroviejo J, Petrucci-Fonseca F, Crandall KA, Ellegren H, Wayne RK, 1999. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography and population history of the grey wolf Canis lupus. Mol Ecol 8:2089-103.
63. Vilà C, Savolainen P, Maldonado JE, Amorim IR, Rice JE, Honeycutt RL, Crandall KA, Lundeberg J, Wayne RK. 1997. Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog. Science 276:1687-9.
64. Vilà C, Seddon J, Ellegren H. 2005. Genes of domestic mammals augmented by backcrossing with wild ancestors. Trends Genet 21:214-8.
65. Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R. 1991. Chelex 100 as a medium for single extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques 10:506-13.
66. Wayne RK. 1986. Cranial morphology of domestic and wild canids: the influence of development on morphological change. Evolution 40:243-61.
67. Yang Z. 1994. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J Mol Evol 39:306-14.
68. Zimen E. 1981. The wolf: his place in the natural world. London: Souvenir Press.