메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 98, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 113-116

The Wingate anaerobic test's past and future and the compatibility of mechanically versus electro-magnetically braked cycle-ergometers

Author keywords

Anaerobic performance; Anaerobic testing; Electro magnetically braked cycle ergometer; Mechanically braked cycle ergometer; Wingate anaerobic test

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC CAPACITY; ARTICLE; BICYCLE ERGOMETER; BICYCLE ERGOMETRY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ENDURANCE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; STANDARDIZATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VALIDITY; WEIGHT BEARING;

EID: 33748123594     PISSN: 14396319     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-006-0251-4     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (36)

References (1)
  • 1
    • 33645466576 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Mechanically vs. electro-magnetically braked cycle ergometer: Performance and energy cost of the Wingate anaerobic test
    • Micklewright D, Alkhatib A, Beneke R (2006) Mechanically vs. electro-magnetically braked cycle ergometer: Performance and energy cost of the Wingate anaerobic test. Eur J Appl Physiol 96:748-751
    • (2006) Eur J Appl Physiol , vol.96 , pp. 748-751
    • Micklewright, D.1    Alkhatib, A.2    Beneke, R.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.