Skewed sex ratio & low aneuploidy in recurrent early missed abortion

Indian Journal of Medical Research

Volumn 124, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 41-50

  Halder, Ashutosh ^a   Fauzdar, Ashish ^a  

^a ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

Aneuploidy; Molecular cytogenetics; Recurrent spontaneous missed abortions; Sex ratio

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CHORION VILLUS SAMPLING; CHROMOSOME 1; CHROMOSOME 12; CHROMOSOME 13; CHROMOSOME 16; CHROMOSOME 18; CHROMOSOME 21; CHROMOSOME 9; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME LOSS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENETIC RISK; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; INDIA; INTERPHASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MISSED ABORTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MOLECULAR PROBE; RECURRENT ABORTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SEX RATIO; X CHROMOSOME; Y CHROMOSOME;

ABORTION, HABITUAL; ABORTION, MISSED; ANEUPLOIDY; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, X; FEMALE; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MALE; PREGNANCY; SEX RATIO;

EID: 33748117440     PISSN: 09715916     EISSN: 09715916     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Warburton D, Fraser FC. Spontaneous abortion risks in man: Data from reproductive histories collected in a medical genetics unit. Am J Hum Genet 1964; 16: 1-25.
2. Coulam CB, Clark DA, Beer AE, Kutteh WH, Silver R, Kwak J, et al. Current clinical options for diagnosis and treatment of recurrent spontaneous abortion. Clinical Guidelines Recommendation Committee for Diagnosis and Treatment of Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion. Am J Reprod Immunol 1997; 38: 57-74.
3. Hassold T, Chen N, Funkhouser J, Jooss T, Manuel B, Matsuura J, et al. A cytogenetic study of 1000 spontaneous abortions. Ann Hum Genet 1980; 44 : 151-78.
4. Kalousek DK, Pantzar T, Tsai M, Paradice B. Early spontaneous abortion: morphologic and karyotypic findings in 3,912 cases. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 1993; 29: 53-61.
5. Jobanputra V, Sobrino A, Kinney A, Kline J, Warburton D. Multiplex interphase FISH as a screen for common aneuploidies in spontaneous abortions. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1166-70.
6. Nagaishi M, Yamamoto T, linuma K, Shimomura K, Berend SA, Knops J. Chromosome abnormalities identified in 347 spontaneous abortions collected in Japan. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2004; 30 : 237-41.
7. Morton NE, Chiu D, Holland C, Jacobs PA, Pettay D. Chromosome anomalies as predictors of recurrence risk for spontaneous abortion. Am J Med Genet 1987; 28 : 353-60.
8. Carp H, Toder V, Aviram A, Daniely M, Mashiach S, Barkai G. Karyotype of the abortus in recurrent miscarriage. Fertil Steril 2001; 75 : 678-82.
9. Songster GS, Sun L, Chang SC, Cheung SW. Chromosome analysis in spontaneous pregnancy loss: use of placental villous mesodermal core cell cultures. Am J Med Genet. 1992; 42 : 785-8.
10. Bartels I, Hansmann I, Eiben B. Excess of females in chromosomally normal spontaneous abortuses. Am J Med Genet 1990; 35 : 297-8.
11. Smith MJ, Creasy MR, Clarke A, Upadbyaya M. Sex ratio and absence of uniparental disomy in spontaneous abortions with a normal karyotype. Clin Genet 1998; 53 : 258-61.
12. Evdokimova VN, Nikitina TV, Lebedev IN, Sukhanova NN, Nazarenko SA. Sex ratio in early embryonal mortality in man. Ontogenez 2000; 31 : 251-7.
13. Hassold T, Quillen SD, Yamane JA. Sex ratio in spontaneous abortions. Ann Hum Genet 1983; 47: 39-47.
14. Kano T, Furudono M, Kano M. Immunostimulation with paternal lymphocytes saves female fetuses from recurrent abortion. Jpn J Fertil Steril 2000; 45 : 113-8.
15. Kano T, Mori T, Furudono M, Kanda T, Maeda Y, Tsubokura S, et al. Sex differences of abortuses and neonates in women with allo-immune recurrent abortions. Reprod Biomed Online 2004; 9: 306-11.
16. Mutter GL, Pomponio RJ, Berkowitz RS, Genest DR. Sex chromosome composition of complete hydatidiform moles: relationship to metastasis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168 : 1547-51.
17. Nikitina TV, Lebedev IN, Sukhanova NN, Sazhenova EA, Nazarenko SA. A mathematical model for evaluation of maternal cell contamination in cultured cells from spontaneous abortions: significance for cytogenetic analysis of prenatal selection factors. Fertil Steril 2005; 83 : 964-72.
18. Diego-Alvarez D, Garcia-Hoyos M, Trujillo MJ, Gonzalez-Gonzalez C, Rodriguez de Alba M, Ayuso C, et al. Application of quantitative fluorescent PCR with short tandem repeat markers to the study of aneuploidies in spontaneous miscarriages. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 1235-43.
19. Bell KA, Van Deerlin PG, Haddad BR, Feinberg RF. Cytogenetic diagnosis of "normal 46,XX" karyotypes in spontaneous abortions frequently may be misleading. Fertil Steril 1999; 71 : 334-41.
20. Jarrett KL, Michaelis RC, Phelan MC, Vincent VA, Best RG. Microsatellite analysis reveals a high incidence of maternal cell contamination in 46,XX products of conception consisting of villi or a combination of villi and membranous material. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185 : 198-203.
21. Tutschek B, Sherlock J, Halder A, Delhanty J, Rodeck CH, Adinolfi M. Isolation of fetal cells from transcervical sample by micromanipulation: molecular confirmation of their fetal origin & diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy. Prenat Diag 1995; 15 : 951-60.
22. Kalousek DK. Two different pregnancy outcomes of trisomic zygote rescue through postzygotic mitotic error. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 1996; 30: 295-9.
23. Sirchia SM, Garagiola I, Colucci G, Guerneri S, Lalatta F, Grimoldi MG, et al. Trisomic zygote rescue revealed by DNA polymorphism analysis in confined placental mosaicism. Prenat Diagn 1998; 18: 201-6.
24. Adinolfi M, Sherlock J, Tutschek B, Halder A, Delhanty J, Rodeck C. Detection of fetal cells in transcervical samples and prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities. Prenat Diagn 1995; 15 : 943-9.
25. Ruangvutilert P, Halder A, Jauniaux E, Arienzo M, Cirigliano V, Sherlock J. A minimally invasive prenatal diagnosis technique for the collection of transcervical cells. Prenat Neonat Med 1998; 3 : 294-6.
26. Carrera M, Ribas I, Torrents M, Me'ndez B, Serra B, de la Iglesia C, et al. Abortos esponta'neos de repeticio'n y anomalý'as cromoso'micas nume'ricas. ¿Es el diagno'stico preimplantacional una alternativa diagno'stica? Prog Diagn Prenat 1996; 8 : 342-7.
27. Dunn TM, Grunfeld L, Kardon NB. Trisomy 1 in a clinically recognized IVF pregnancy. Am J Med Genet 2001; 99: 152-3.
28. Hanna JS, Shires P, Matile G. Trisomy 1 in a clinically recognized pregnancy. Am J Med Genet 1997; 68 : 98.
29. Banzai M, Sato S, Matsuda H, Kanasugi H. Trisomy 1 in a case of a missed abortion. J Hum Genet 2004; 49 : 396-7.
30. Khan AH. Trisomy 16, cause of first trimester abortion. J Pak Med Assoc 2001; 51 : 378-9.
31. Carp H, Toder V, Aviram A, Daniely M, Mashiach S, Barkai G. Karyotype of the abortus in recurrent miscarriage. Fertil Steril 2001; 75 : 678-82.
32. Simpson JL. Genes, chromosomes and reproductive failure. Fertil Steril 1980; 33 : 107-16.
33. Ogasawara M, Aoki K, Okada S, Suzumori K. Embryonic karyotypes of abortuses in relation to number of previous miscarriages. Fertil Steril 2000; 73 : 300-4.
34. Andrews T, Dunlop W, Roberts DF. Cytogenetic studies in spontaneous abortuses. Hum Genet 1984; 66 : 77-84.
35. Kukharenko VI. The primary sex ratio in man (analysis of 1014 embryos). Genetika 1970; 6: 142-9.
36. Yusuf RZ, Naeem R. Cytogenetic abnormalities in products of conception: a relationship revisited. Am J Reprod Immunol 2004; 52 : 88-96.
37. Milki AA, Jun SH, Hinckley MD, Westphal LW, Giudice LC, Behr B. Comparison of the sex ratio with blastocyst transfer and cleavage stage transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 2003; 20 : 323-6.
38. Nonaka K, Desjardins B, Charbonneau H, Legare J, Miura T. Marriage season, promptness of successful pregnancy and first-born sex ratio in a historical natural fertility population - evidence for sex-dependent early pregnancy loss? Int J Biometeorol 1998; 42 : 89-92.
39. Hoshi N, Hanatani K, Kishida T, Sagawa T, Fujimoto S. Chromosomal analysis in 894 induced abortuses from women of advanced maternal age in relation to gestational weeks and fetal sex ratio. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 1997; 23 : 1-7.
40. Halder A. Placental chimerism in early human pregnancy. Indian J Hum Genetics 2005; 11 : 84-8.
41. Mocarelli P, Gerthouz PM, Ferrari E, Patterson DG Jr, Kieszak SM, Brambilla P, et al. Paternal concentrations of dioxin and sex ratio of offspring. Lancet 2000; 355 : 1858-63.
42. Schnorr TM, Lawson CC, Whelan EA, Dankovic DA, Deddens JA, Piacitelli LA, et al. Spontaneous abortion, sex ratio and paternal exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzop-dioxin. Environ Health Perspect 2001; 109 : 1127-32.
43. Karmaus W, Huang S, Cameron L. Parental concentration of dichlorodiphenyl dichloroethene and polychlorinated biphenyls in Michigan fish eaters and sex ratio in offspring. J Occup Environ Med 2002; 44 : 8-13.
44. Halder A, Pahi J, Pradhan M, Pandey A, Gujral R, Agarwal SS. Iniencephaly: a report of 19 cases. Indian Pediatrics 1998; 35 : 891-6.
45. Engel E, DeLozier-Blanchet CD. Uniparental disomy, isodisomy & imprinting: probable effect in man and strategies for their detection. Am J Med Genet 1991; 40 : 432-9.
46. Barton SC, Adams CA, Norris ML, Surani MA. Development of gynogenetic and parthenogenetic inner cell mass and trophectoderm tissues in reconstituted blastocysts in the mouse. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1985; 90 : 267-85.
47. Boklage CE. The epigenetic environment: secondary sex ratio depends on differential survival in embryogenesis. Hum Reprod 2005; 20 : 583-7.
48. Werren JH, Hatcher MJ. Maternal-zygotic gene conflict over sex determination: effects of inbreeding. Genetics 2000; 155 : 1469-79.
49. Thornhill AR, Burgoyne PS. A paternally imprinted X chromosome retards the development of the early mouse embryo. Development 1993; 118 : 171-4.
50. Kelly TE, Ferguson JE, Golden W. Survival of fetuses with 45,X: an instructive case and a hypothesis. Am J Med Genet 1992; 42 : 825-6.
51. Eiben B, Borgmann S, Schubbe I, Hausmann I. A cytogenetic study directly from chorionic villi of 140 spontaneous abortions. Hum Genet 1987; 77 : 137-41.
52. Edwards RG. New outlooks on gene activation and X inactivation in mouse embryos. Reprod Bio Med Online 2004; 8: 248-50.