Topographic change in ERP due to discrimination of geometric figures in the peripheral visual field

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 115-121

  Shoji, Hiroaki ^a   Ozaki, Hisaki ^a  

^a IBARAKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

N1 component; P2 component; Pattern recognition; Peripheral vision; Visual evoked potential (VEP)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PERFORMANCE; PERIPHERAL VISION; RETINA; STIMULUS; TOPOGRAPHY; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33748105654     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.02.007     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baseler H.A., Sutter E.E., Klein S.A., and Carney T. The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 90 (1994) 65-81
2. Brandeis D., and Lehmann D. Segments of event-related potential map series reveal landscape changes with visual attention and subjective contours. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 73 (1989) 507-519
3. Brecelj J., Kakigi R., Koyama S., and Hoshiyama M. Visual evoked magnetic responses to central and peripheral stimulation: simultaneous VEP recordings. Brain Topogr. 10 (1998) 227-237
4. Clark V.P., Fan S., and Hillyard S.A. Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2 (1995) 170-187
5. Curcio C.A., Sloan K.R.J., Packer O., Hendrickson A.E., and Kalina R.E. Distribution of cones in human and monkey retina: individual variability and radial asymmetry. Science 236 (1987) 579-582
6. Desimone R., Albright T.D., Gross C.G., and Bruce C. Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque. J. Neurosci. 4 (1984) 2051-2062
7. Di Russo F., Martinez A., Sereno M.I., Pitzalis S., and Hillyard S.A. Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Hum. Brain Mapp. 15 (2002) 95-111
8. Di Russo F., Pitzalis S., Spitoni G., Aprile T., Patria F., Spinelli D., and Hillyard S.A. Identification of the neural sources of the pattern-reversal VEP. Neuroimage 24 (2005) 874-886
9. Dow B.M., Snyder A.Z., Vautin R.G., and Bauer R. Magnification factor and receptive field size in foveal striate cortex of the monkey. Exp. Brain Res. 44 (1981) 213-228
10. Duncan R.O., and Boynton G.M. Cortical magnification within human primary visual cortex correlates with acuity thresholds. Neuron 38 (2003) 659-671
11. Henderson J.M., and Hollingworth A. Eye movements during scene viewing: an overview. In: Underwood G. (Ed). Eye Guidance in Reading and Scene Perception (1998), Elsevier, Amsterdam 295-312
12. Holmes G. The organization of the visual cortex in man. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B. Biol. Sci. 132 (1945) 348-361
13. Ikeda M., Uchikawa K., and Saida S. Static and dynamic functional visual fields. J. Mod. Opt. 26 (1979) 1103-1113
14. Ito M., and Sugata T. Visual evoked potentials to geometric forms. Jpn. Psychol. Res. 37 (1995) 221-228
15. Ito M., Sugata T., and Kuwabara H. Visual evoked potentials to geometric forms: effects of spatial orientation. Jpn. Psychol. Res. 39 (1997) 339-344
16. Ito M., Kuwabara H., Sugata T., Suzuki K., and Kawai Y. Visual evoked potentials to the geometric forms in the randomized presentation. Jpn. Psychol. Res. 40 (1998) 111-116
17. Ito M., Sugata T., Kuwabara H., Wu C., and Kojima K. Effects of angularity of the figures with sharp and round corners on visual evoked potentials. Jpn. Psychol. Res. 41 (1999) 91-101
18. Jedynak A., and Skrandies W. Functional perimetry combined with topographical VEP analysis. Int. J. Neurosci. 93 (1998) 117-132
19. Kohler S., Kapur S., Moscovitch M., Winocur G., and Houle S. Dissociation of pathways for object and spatial vision: a PET study in humans. Neuroreport 6 (1995) 1865-1868
20. Kubová Z., Kuba M., Spekreijse H., and Blakemore C. Contrast dependence of motion-onset and pattern-reversal evoked potentials. Vis. Res. 35 (1995) 197-205
21. Kurita-Tashima S., Tobimatsu S., Nakayama-Hiromatsu M., and Kato M. Effect of check size on the pattern reversal visual evoked potential. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 80 (1991) 161-166
22. Lehmann D. Principles of spatial analysis. In: Gevins A., and Remond A. (Eds). Handbook of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. Methods of Analysis of Brain Electrical and Magnetic Signals vol. 1 (1987), Elsevier, Amsterdam 309-354
23. Lehmann D., and Skrandies W. Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 48 (1980) 609-621
24. O'Donnell B.F., Swearer J.M., Smith L.T., Hokama H., and McCarley R.W. A topographic study of ERPs elicited by visual feature discrimination. Brain Topogr. 10 (1997) 133-143
25. Okusa T., Kaneoke Y., Koyama S., and Kakigi R. Random dots blinking: a new approach to elucidate the activities of the extrastriate cortex in humans. Neuroreport 9 (1998) 3961-3965
26. Østerberg G. Topography of the layer of rods and cones in the human retina. Acta Ophthalmol., Suppl. 6 (1935) 1-103
27. Shoji H., Shinoda H., and Ozaki H. The useful visual field and ERP topography in persons with intellectual disabilities. In: Hirata K., Koga Y., Nagata K., and Yamazaki K. (Eds). Recent Advances in Human Brain Mapping (2002), Elsevier, Amsterdam 723-728
28. Slotnick S.D., Klein S.A., Carney T., and Sutter E.E. Electrophysiological estimate of human cortical magnification. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112 (2001) 1349-1356
29. Spalding J.M. Wounds of the visual pathway. Part II. The striate cortex. J. Neurochem. 15 (1952) 169-183
30. Thorpe S., Fize D., and Marlot C. Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381 (1996) 520-522
31. Tumas V., and Sakamoto A.C. Comparison of the mechanisms of latency shift in pattern reversal visual evoked potential induced by blurring and contrast reduction. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 104 (1997) 96-100
32. Ungerleider L.G., and Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle D.J., Goodale M.A., and Mansfield R.J.W. (Eds). Analysis of Visual Behavior (1982), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 549-586
33. Wang L., Barber C., Kakigi R., Kaneoke Y., Okusa T., and Wen Y. A first comparison of the human multifocal visual evoked magnetic field and visual evoked potential. Neurosci. Lett. 315 (2001) 13-16
34. Westheimer G. The distribution of preferred orientations in the peripheral visual field. Vis. Res. 43 (2003) 53-57
35. Weymouth F.W. Visual sensory units and the minimal angle of resolution. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 46 (1958) 102-113