Innovative approaches to obtaining community feedback in the witness for wellness experience

Ethnicity and Disease

Volumn 16, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2006, Pages

  Patel, Kavita K ^a   Koegel, Paul ^d   Booker, Ted ^c   Jones, Loretta ^c   Wells, Kenneth ^b,d  

^a Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program   (United States)

^b Health Services Research   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Community; Delphi; Feedback; Participatory; Research

Indexed keywords

AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARTICLE; CONSUMER; COOPERATION; DELPHI STUDY; GROUP PROCESS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; METHODOLOGY; STANDARD; UNIVERSITY;

AFRICAN AMERICANS; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; GROUP PROCESSES; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 33748099124     PISSN: 1049510X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Institute of Medicine. Promoting Health: Intervention Strategies from Social and Behavioral Research. 2nd ed. Vol 2. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
2. Institute of Medicine. Public Confidence and Involvement in Clinical Research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
3. Smedley BD, Syme SL. Promoting health: intervention strategies from social and behavioral research. Am J Health Promot. 2001; 15(3):149-166.
4. Viswanathan M, Ammerman A, Eng E, et al. Community-Based Participatory Research: Assessing the Evidence. Rockville, Md: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004. AHRQ Publication 04-E022-2.
5. Minkler M. Ethical challenges for the "outside" researcher in community-based participatory research. Health Educ Behav. 2004; 31(6):684-697.
6. Ammerman A, Corbie-Smith G, St George DM, et al. Research expectations among African-American church leaders in the PRAISE! project: a randomized trial guided by community-based participatory research. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(10):1720-1727. (Pubitemid 38477641)
7. Suarez-Balcazar Y, Harper GW, Lewis R. An interactive and contextual model of community-university collaborations for research and action. Health Educ Behav. 2005;32(1): 84-101. (Pubitemid 40187773)
8. Chinman M. Community Coalitions: A Fair and Balanced View. Lecture to Clinical Scholars, UCLA. September 21, 2004.
9. Eng E, Parker EA. Measuring community competence in the Mississippi Delta: the interface between program evaluations and empowerment. Health Educ Q. 1994;21(2): 199-220.
10. Minkler M, Wallerstein N. Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. New York, NY: Jossey-Bass; 2002.
11. Travers KD. Reducing inequities through participatory research and community empowerment. Health Ed Behav. 1997;24: 344-356.
12. Zambrana RE. The role of Latino/Hispanic communities in health services research: strategies for a meaningful partnership. J Med Syst. 1996;20:317-328.
13. Park RE, Fink A, Brook RH, et al. Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures. Am J Public Health. 1986;76(7):766-772.
14. Fink A. Program evaluation in health care. CMAJ. 1992;147(8):1116-1118.
15. Letiecq BL, Bailey SJ. Evaluating from the outside: conducting cross-cultural evaluation research on an American Indian reservation. Eval Rev. 2004;28(4):342-357.
16. Minkler W. Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. Vol 1. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey Bass; 2003.
17. Champeau DA, Shaw SM. Power, empowerment, and critical consciousness in community collaboration: lessons from an advisory panel for an HIV awareness media campaign for women. Women Health. 2002;36(3): 31-50.
18. Galea S, Factor SH, Bonner S, et al. Collaboration among community members, local health service providers, and researchers in an urban research center in Harlem, New York. Public Health Rep. 2001;116(6): 530-539.
19. Eggert CH, West CP, Thomas KG. Impact of an audience response system. Med Educ. 2004;38(5):576.
20. Turpin DL. Enhance learning with an audience response system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124(6):607.
21. Jones L. Perinatal HIV transmission and birth options for HIV positive mothers. Posit Aware. 2003;14(5):45-48.
22. Philips B Jr, Anderson G, Ridl K. Establishing a women's health curriculum using the Delphi Method. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2003;16(2): 155-162.
23. Hancock T. Public health planning in the City of Toronto-Part 1. Conceptual planning. Can J Public Health. 1986;77(3):180-184.
24. Halvorsen KE. Assessing public participation techniques for comfort, convenience, satisfaction, and deliberation. Environ Manage. 2001;28(2):179-186.
25. Klapper JA, Sheftell FD, Seawell M. Demographics of attendees at public education seminars. Headache. 1999;39(10):752-753.
26. Latessa R, Mouw D. Use of an audience response system to augment interactive learning. Fam Med. 2005;37(1):12-14.
27. Schackow TE, Chavez M, Loya L, Friedman M. Audience response system: effect on learning in family medicine residents. Fam Med. 2004;36(7):496-504.
28. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Beck AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Ann Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173-202.
29. Lasker RD, Weiss ES. Broadening participation in community problem solving: a multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research. J Urban Health. 2003; 80(1):14-47.
30. Macaulay AC, Ryan JG. Community needs assessment and development using the participatory research model. Ann Family Med. 2003;1(3):183-184.
31. Hope A, Timmel S. Training for Transformation: Books 1-4: A Handbook for Community Workers. New York, NY: Russell Press, Ltd; 2001.
32. Green LW. Ethics and community-based participatory research: commentary on Minkler. Health Educ Behav. 2004;31(6):698-701.