How frail elders evaluate their caregiver's role enactment: A scale to measure affection, skill, and attentiveness

Journal of Family Nursing

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 251-275

  Tetz, Karen B ^a   Archbold, Patricia G ^b   Stewart, Barbara J ^b   Messecar, Deborah ^b   Hornbrook, Mark C ^c   Lucas, Stephanie A ^d  

^a Walla Walla College   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^d Senior and Disabled Services Division   (United States)

Author keywords

Care receiver view of family care; Family caregiving; Frail elders; Instrument development; Quality of caregiver role enactment

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CAREGIVER; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COOPERATION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EDUCATION; EMPATHY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FAMILY; FEMALE; FRAIL ELDERLY; HOME CARE; HUMAN; LOVE; MALE; MENTAL STRESS; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROLE PLAYING; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTENTION; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CAREGIVERS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EMPATHY; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FAMILY; FEMALE; FRAIL ELDERLY; HOME NURSING; HUMANS; LOVE; MALE; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES; ROLE; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 33748099121     PISSN: 10748407     EISSN: 1552549X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1074840706291554     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Archbold, P. G., & Stewart, B. J. (1985). The effects of organized family caregiver relief (National Institute of Nursing Research for Grant No. R01 NU/AG 01140). Portland, OR: Oregon Health Sciences University, School of Nursing.
2. Archbold, P. G., Stewart, B. J., Greenlick, M. R., & Harvath, T. (1990). Mutuality and preparedness as predictors of caregiver role strain. Research in Nursing & Health, 13, 375-384.
3. Archbold, P.G., Stewart, B. J., Greenlick, M. R., & Valanis, B. (1990). Evaluation of a Caregiving Support Program (National Institute of Nursing Research for Grant No. R01-NR-02088). Portland, OR: Oregon Health Sciences University, School of Nursing.
4. Archbold, P.G., Stewart, B. J., & Hornbrook, M. (1999). PREP: Family-based care for frail older persons (National Institute of Nursing Research for Grant No. R01 AG17909). (Instruments and unpublished raw data). Portland, OR: Oregon Health Sciences University, School of Nursing.
5. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism perspective and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6. Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.
7. Burr, W. R., Leigh, G. K., Day, R. D., & Constantine, J. (1979). Symbolic interaction and the family. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family: Vol. 2 (pp. 42-111). New York: Free Press.
8. Castle, N. G., Engberg, J. (2004). Response formats and satisfaction surveys for elders. The Gerontologist, 44, 358-367.
9. Coyle, J. (1999). Understanding dissatisfied users: Developing a framework for comprehending criticisms of health care work. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30, 723-731.
10. Coyle, J., & Williams, B. (2000). An exploration of the epistemological intricacies of using qualitative data to develop a quantitative measure of user views of health care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31, 1235-1243.
11. DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Dwyer, J. W., Lee, G. R., & Jankowski, T. B. (1994). Reciprocity, elder satisfaction, and care-giver stress and burden: The exchange of aid in the family caregiving relationship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 35-43.
13. Feinberg, L. F., & Whitlatch, C. J. (2001). Are persons with cognitive impairment able to state consistent choices? Gerontologist, 41, 374-382.
14. Fiese, B. H., Tomcho, T. J., Douglas, M., Josephs, K., Poltrock, S., & Baker, T. (2002). A review of 50 years of research on naturally occurring family routines and rituals: Cause for celebration? Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 381-390.
15. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.
16. Hollis-Sawyer, L. A. (2001). Adaptive, growth-oriented, and positive perceptions of mother-daughter elder caregiving relationships: A path-analytic investigation of predictors. Journal of Women & Aging, 13 (3), 5-22.
17. Ingersoll-Dayton, B., & Raschick, M. (2004). The relationship between care-recipient behaviors and spousal caregiving stress. Gerontologist, 44, 318-327.
18. Lucas, S. A. (1986). Measuring satisfaction with caregiving: A methodological study. Unpublished master's research project, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland.
19. Lucas, S. A., Stewart, B. J., Archbold, P. G., & Harvath, T. A. (1986, November). Measuring satisfaction with caregiving. Poster session presented at the 39th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Chicago.
20. Martini, T. S., Grusec, J. E., & Bernardini, S. C. (2001). Effects of interpersonal control, perspective taking, and attributions on older mothers' and adult daughters' satisfaction with their helping relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 688-705.
21. Martire, L. M., Schulz, R., Wrosch, C., & Newsom, J. T. (2003). Perceptions and implications of received spousal care: Evidence from the caregiver health effects study. Psychology and Aging, 18, 593-601.
22. Miller, B., & Cafasso, L. (1992). Gender differences in caregiving: fact or artifact? Gerontologist, 32, 498-507.
23. Montgomery, R., & Borgatta, E. (n.d.). Interview schedules. Seattle, WA: Family Support Project, Institute on Aging and Long-term Care, University of Washington.
24. Morrow-Howell, N., Proctor, E., & Rozario, P. (2001). How much is enough? Perspectives of care recipients and professionals on the sufficiency of in-home care. Gerontologist, 41, 723-732.
25. National Center for Health Statistics. (1984). National Health Interview Survey, 1984 Supplement on Aging Questionnaire, Form HIS-1 (SB)(3-13-84). Vital and Health Statistics, 1, 62-63.
26. Newsom, J. T., Adams, N. L., Rahim, A., Mowry, H., & Rogers, J. D. (1998, November). Approaches to measuring care-recipients' negative reactions to assistance. Poster session presented at the 51st Annual Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Philadelphia.
27. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.
28. Russell, C. K., Phillips, L. R., Cromwell, S. L., & Gregory, D. M. (1999). Elder-caregiver care negotiations as dances of dependency. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice: An International Journal, 13, 283-304.
29. Schumacher, K. L., Stewart, B. J., Archbold, P. G., Dodd, M. J., & Dibble, S. L. (2000). Family caregiving skill: Development of the concept. Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 191-203.
30. Sorensen, S., Pinquart, M., & Duberstein, P. (2002). How effective are interventions with care-givers? An updated meta-analysis. Gerontologist, 42, 356-372.
31. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
32. Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Medical Care, 30, 473-483.
33. Williams, B., Coyle, J., & Healy, D. (1998). The meaning of patient satisfaction: An explanation of high reported levels. Social Science Medicine, 47, 1351-1359.