A novel in vitro model to study staphylococcal biofilm formation on intraocular lenses under hydrodynamic conditions

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 47, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 3410-3416

  Baillif, Stéphanie ^a,b,c   Casoli, Emmanuelle ^b   Marion, Karine ^b   Roques, Christine ^d   Pellon, Gérard ^e   Hartmann, Daniel Jean ^b   Freney, Jean ^b   Burillon, Carole ^a,b   Kodjikian, Laurent ^a,b,c  

^a EDOUARD HERRIOT HOSPITAL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^c CROIX ROUSSE HOSPITAL   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AQUEOUS HUMOR; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COLONIZATION; BIOFILM; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ENDOPHTHALMITIS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FLOW MEASUREMENT; HYDRODYNAMICS; IN VITRO STUDY; LENS IMPLANT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STAPHYLOCOCCUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS; BACTERIAL COUNT; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESSURE;

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN;

ACRYLIC RESINS; BACTERIAL ADHESION; BIOFILMS; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PRESSURE; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS;

EID: 33748095799     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-1070     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Alfonso EC, Flynn HW Jr. Controversies in endophthalmitis prevention: the risk for emerging resistance to vancomycin. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:1369-1370.
2. Wejde G, Montan P, Lundstrom M, Stenevi U, Thorburn W. Endophthalmitis following cataract surgery in Sweden: national prospective survey 1999-2001. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005;83:7-10.
3. Speaker MG, Menikoff JA. Postoperative endophthalmitis: pathogenesis, prophylaxis, and management. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1993;33:51-70.
4. Han DP, Wisniewski SR, Wilson LA, et al. Spectrum and susceptibilities of microbiologic isolates in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;122:1-17.
5. Kodjikian L, Burillon C, Lina G, et al. Biofilm formation on intraocular lenses by a clinical strain encoding the ica locus: a scanning electron microscopy study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4382-4387.
6. Burillon C, Kodjikian L, Pellon G, et al. In vitro study of bacterial adherence to different types of intraocular lenses. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2002;28:95-99.
7. Ng EWM, Barett GD, Bowman R. In vitro bacterial adherence to hydrogel and polymethyl methacrylate intraocular lenses. J Catarac Refract Surg. 1996;22:1331-1335.
8. Cusumano A, Busin M, Spitznas M. Is chronic intraocular inflammation after lens implantation of bacterial origin? Ophthalmology. 1991;98:1703-1710.
9. Dilly PN, Sellors PJ. Bacterial adhesion to intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refrac Surg. 1989;15:317-320.
10. Griffiths PG, Elliot TS, Mc Taggart L. Adherence of Staphylococcus epidermidis to intraocular lenses. Br J Ophthalmol. 1989;73:402-406.
11. Gristina AG. Biomaterial centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. Science. 1987;237:1583-1595.
12. Kodjikian L, Burillon C, Roques C, Pellon G, Freney J, Renaud FN. Bacterial adherence of Staphylococcus epidermidis to intraocular lenses: a bioluminescence and scanning electron microscopy study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4388-4394.
13. Schauersberger J, Amon M, Aichinger D, Georgopoulos A. Bacterial adhesion to rigid and foldable posterior chamber intraocular lenses. In vitro study J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:361-366.
14. Pinna A, Sechi LA, Zanetti S, Delogu D, Carta F. Adherence of ocular isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis to Acrysof intraocular lenses: a scanning electron microscopy and molecular biology study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:2162-2166.
15. Garcia-Saenz MC, Arias-Puente A, Fresnadillo-Martinez M, Matilla-Rodrigue A. In vitro adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis to intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refrac Surg. 2000;26:1673-1679.
16. Abu El-Asrar AM, Shibl AM, Tabbara KF, al-Kharashi SA. Heparin and heparin-surface-modification reduce Staphylococcus epidermidis adhesion to intraocular lenses. Int Ophthalmol. 1997;21:71-74.
17. Cusumano A, Busin M, Spitznas M. Bacterial growth is significantly enhanced on foldable intraocular lenses. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:1015-1016.
18. Arciola CR, Caramazza R, Pizzoferrato A. In vitro adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis on heparin-surface-modified intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994;20:158-161.
19. Portoles M, Refojo MF, Leong FL. Reduced bacterial adhesion to heparin-surface-modified intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19:755-759.
20. Kodjikian L, Burillon C, Chanloy C, et al. In vivo study of bacterial adhesion to five types of intraocular lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:3717-3721.
21. Olson ME, Costerton JW. Colonisation of n-butyl-2-cyano-acrylate tissue adhesive by Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Biomed Mater Res. 1988;22:485-595.
22. Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Cadwell DE, Korber DR, Lappin-Scott HM. Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1995;45:711-745.
23. Marion-Ferey K, Enkiri F, Pasmore M, Husson GP, Vilagines R. Methods for biofilm analysis on silicone tubing of dialysis machines. Artif Organs. 2003;27:658-664.
24. Donlan RM. Biofilms and device-associated infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:277-281.
25. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:167-193.
26. Jansen B, Peters G. Modern strategies in the prevention of polymer-associated infections. J Hosp Infect. 1991;19:83-88.
27. Leong JK, Shah R, McCluskey PJ, Benn RA, Taylor RF. Bacterial contamination of the anterior chamber during phacoemulsification cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:826-833.
28. Srinivasan R, Tiroumal S, Kanungo R, Natarajan MK. Microbial contamination of the anterior chamber during phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:2173-2176.
29. Egger SF, Huber-Spizy V, Scholda C, Schneider B, Grabner G. Bacterial contamination during extracapsular cataract extraction. Ophthalmologica. 1994;208:77-81.
30. Dickey JB, Thompson KD, Jay WM. Anterior chamber aspirate cultures after uncomplicated cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;112:278-282.
31. Bron A. Endophthalmitis: diagnosis. J Fr Ophthalmol. 1996;19:225-240.
32. Salvanet-Bouccara A, Robert M. Infectious endophthalmitis. Rev Prat. 1992;42:960-965.
33. Kadry AA, Tawfik A, Abu El-Asrar AA, Shibl AM. Reduction of mucoid Staphylococcus epidermidis adherence to intraocular lenses by selected antimicrobial agents. Chemotherapy. 1999;45:56-60.
34. Mack D. Molecular mechanisms of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation. J Hosp Infect. 1999;43(suppl):113-125.
35. Dobinsky S, Kiel K, Rohde H, et al. Glucose-related dissociation between ica ADBC transcription and biofilm expression by Staphylococcus epidermidis: evidence for an additional factor required for polysaccharide intercellular adhesion synthesis. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:2879-2886.
36. Dunne WM. Bacterial adhesion: seen any good biofilm lately? Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;25:155-166.
37. Cramton SE, Ulrich M, Gotz F, Doring G. Anaerobic conditions induce expression of the polysaccharide intercellular adhesion in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect Immun. 2001;69:4079-4085.
38. Rohde H, Knobloch JKM, Horstkotte MA, Mack D. Correlation of biofilm expression types of Staphylococcus epidermidis with polysaccharide intercellular adhesion synthesis: evidence for involvement of ica ADBC genotype-independent factors. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2001;190:105-112.
39. Rachid S, Ohlsen K, Witte W, Hacker J, Ziebuhr W. Effect of subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations on polysaccharide intercellular adhesin expression in biofilm forming Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:3357-3363.
40. An YH, Dickinson RB, Doyle RJ. Mecanisms of bacterial adhesion and pathogenesis of implant and tissue infections. In: An YH, Friedman RJ, eds. Handbook of Bacterial Adhesion: Principles, Methods and Applications. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2000;1-27.
41. Mack D, Rohde H, Dobinsky S, et al. Identification of three essential regulatory gene loci governing expression of the Staphylococcus epidermidis polysaccharide intercellular adhesion and biofilm formation. Infect Immun. 2000;68:3799-3807.
42. Deighton MA, Franklin JC, Spicer WJ, Balkau B. Species identification, antibiotic sensitivity and slime production of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from clinical specimen. Epidemiol Infect. 1988;101:99-113.
43. Carpentier B, Cerf O. Biofilms and their consequences, with particular reference to hygiene in the food industry. J Appl Bacteriol. 1993;75:449-511.
44. Hussain M, Wilcox MH, White PJ, Faulkner MK, Spencer RC. Importance of medium and atmosphere type to both slime production and adherence by coagulase negative staphylococci. J Hosp Infect. 1992;20:173-184.
45. Mack D, Siemssen N, Laufs R. Parallel induction by glucose of adherence and a polysaccharide antigen specific for plastic-adherent Staphylococcus epidermidis: evidence for functional relation to intercellular adhesion. Infect Immun. 1992;60:2048-2057.
46. Barker LP, Simpson WA, Christensen GD. Differential production of slime under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28:2578-2579.
47. Brown MRW, Williams P. The influence of environment on envelope properties affecting survival of bacteria in infections. A Rev Microbiol. 1985;39:527-556.
48. Fletcher M. Adherence of marine microorganisms to smooth surfaces. In: Beachey EH, ed. Bacterial Adherence. London: Chapman and Hall; 1980:345.
49. Gibbons RJ. Adherence of bacteria to host tissue. In: Schlessinger D, ed. Microbiology. Washington, DC: American Society of Microbiology; 1977:395.
50. Fitzpatrick F, Humphreys H, Smyth E, Kennedy CA, O'Gara JP. Environmental regulation of biofilm formation in intensive care unit isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Hosp Infect. 2002;42:212-218.
51. Cramton SE, Gerke C, Schnell NF, Nichols WW, Gotz F. The intercellular adhesion (ica) locus is present in Staphylococcus aureus and is required for biofilm formation. Infect Immun. 1999;67:5427-5433.
52. McKenney D, Hubner J, Muller E, et al. The ica locus of Staphylococcus epidermidis encodes production of the capsular polysaccharide/adhesin. Infect Immun. 1998;66:4711-4720.
53. Deighton M, Borland R. Regulation of slime production in Staphylococcus epidermidis by iron limitation. Infect Immun. 1993;61:4473-4479.
54. Dunne WM, Burd EM. The effects of magnesium, calcium, EDTA and pH on the in vitro adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis to plastic. Microbiol Immunol. 1992;36:1019-1027.
55. Cramton SE, Gotz F. Biofilm development in Staphylococcus. In: Ghannoum M O'Toole GA, ed. Microbial Biofilms. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2004:64-84.
56. Fisch A, Salvanet A, Prazuck T, et al. Epidemiology of infective endophthalmitis in France. Lancet. 1991;338:1373-1376.
57. Romanet JP, Noel C. Humeur aqueuse et pression intraoculaire. Encyclopédie Médicale et Chirurgicale. Paris: Ophtalmologie; 1998;21020D10.
58. Ecoffet M, Demailly PH, Kopel J. Physiologie de l'humeur aqueuse et de la tension oculaire. Encyclopédie Médicale et Chirurgicale. Paris: Ophtalmologie; 1985;21020D10.
59. Lundberg F, Gouda I, Larm O, Galin MA, Ljungh A. A new model to assess staphylococcal adhesion to intraocular lenses under in vitro flow conditions. Biomaterials. 1998;19:1727-1733.
60. Davson H. Physiology of the Ocular and Cerebrospinal Fluids. London: J and A Churchill, Ltd.; 1956.
61. Mukai M. Studies on proteins of aqueous humour: protein fractions of normal and secondary aqueous humour. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1970;74:1269-1276.
62. Brubaker RF. Flow of aqueous humor in humans. The Friedenwald Lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:3145-3166.
63. Heys JJ, Barocas VH. A Boussinesq model of natural convection in the human eye and the formation of Krukenberg's spindle. Ann Biomed Eng. 2002;30:392-401.
64. Moses RA. Intraocular pressure. In: Moses RA, ed. Adler's Physiology of the Eye. 6th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1975:179-191.
65. Amsler M, Verrey F, Huber A. L'humeur aqueuse et ses fonctions. Rapport de la Société Française d'Ophtalmologie. Paris: Masson; 1955:278-299.
66. Purevdorj-Gage LB, Stoodley P. Biofilm structure, behaviour and hydrodynamics. In: Ghannoum M, O'Toole GA, eds. Microbial Biofilms. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2004:160-173.
67. Stoodley P, De Beer D, Boyle JD, Lappin-Scott HM. Evolving perspectives of biofilm structure. Biofouling. 1999;14:75-94.
68. Stoodley P, Lewandowski Z, Boyle JD, Lappin-Scott JM. Oscillation characteristics of biofilm streamers in turbulent flowing water as related to drag and pressure drop. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1998;57:536-544.
69. Stoodley P, Cargo R, Rupp CJ, Wilson CJ, Klapper I. Biofilm mechanics and shear induced deformation and detachment. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;29:361-368.
70. Characklis WG, Trulear HG, Bryers JD, Zelver N. Dynamics of biofilm process: methods. Water Res. 1982;16:1207-1216.
71. Peyton BM. Effects of shear stress and substrate loading rate on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm thickness and density. Water Res. 1996;30:29 -36.
72. Bryers JD. Modeling biofilm accumulation. In: Bazin M, Prosser JI, eds. Physiological Models in Microbiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1988:109-144.
73. Gabriel MM, Ahearn DG, Chan KY, Patel AS. In vitro adherence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to four intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:124-129.
74. Gotz F. Staphylococcus and biofilm. Mol Microbiol. 2002;43:1367-1378.
75. Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet. 2001;358:135-138.
76. Costerton JW. Introduction to biofilm. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1999;11:217-221.
77. Ceri H, Olson ME, Stremick C, Read RR, Worck D, Buret A. The Calgary biofilm device: new technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:1771-1776.
78. Costerton JW, Veeh R, Shirtliff M, Pasmore M, Post C, Ehrlich G. The application of biofilm science to the study and control of chronic bacterial infections. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:1466-1477.