Patient safety in surgery

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 243, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 628-632

  Makary, Martin A ^a,b,d   Sexton, J Bryan ^a,b   Freischlag, Julie A ^a   Millman, E Anne ^e   Pryor, David ^c   Holzmueller, Christine ^a   Pronovost, Peter J ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c ASCENSION HEALTH   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACE VALIDITY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GENERAL SURGERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MALE; MEDICAL ERROR; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; NURSE; OPERATING ROOM; OPERATING ROOM PERSONNEL; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SAFETY; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGEON; SURGICAL WARD; VALIDATION PROCESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORGANIZATION; SAFETY; STANDARD; SURGERY; ANESTHESIA; ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS; BURNOUT; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; EMERGENCY WARD; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HOSPITAL PERSONNEL; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; JOB SATISFACTION; NOTE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SURGICAL INFECTION; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; VALIDITY; VENTILATOR ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA; WORK ENVIRONMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; HUMANS; OPERATING ROOMS; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SAFETY; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT;

EID: 33748094815     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000216410.74062.0f     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Vincent C, Moorthy K, Sarker SK, et al. Systems approaches to surgical quality and safety: from concept to measurement. Ann Surg. 2004;239:475-482.
2. Kohn L, Corrigan J, Donaldson M, eds. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System [Institute of Medicine Report]. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.
3. Institute of Medicine. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health Care System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
4. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Sentinel Events: Evaluating Cause and Planning Improvement. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, 1998.
5. Helmreich RL, Foushee HC, Benson R, et al. Cockpit resource management: exploring the attitude-performance linkage. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1986;57:1198-1200.
6. Shortell SM, Zimmerman JE, Rousseau DM, et al. The performance of intensive care units: does good management make a difference? Med Care. 1994;32:508-525.
7. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:410-418.
8. Baggs JG, Ryan SA, Phelps CE, et al. The association between interdisciplinary collaboration and patient outcomes in a medical intensive care unit. Heart Lung. 1992;21:18-24.
9. Sexton JB, Thomas EJ, Helmreich RL. Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys. BMJ. 2000;320:745-749.
10. Makary MA, Sexton JB, Freischlag JA, et al. Teamwork in the operating room: teamwork in the eye of the beholder. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;91st Clinical Congress.
11. Helmreich RL, Merrit AC, Sherman PJ, et al. The Flight Management Attitudes Questionnaire (FMAQ). Austin, TX: University of Texas NASA/UT/FAA, 1993:93-94.
12. Helmreich RL. Cockpit management attitudes. Hum Factors. 1984;26:583-589.
13. Gregorich SE, Helmreich RL, Wilhelm JA. The structure of cockpit management attitudes. J Appl Psychol. 1990;75:682-690.
14. Foushee H. Dyads and triads at 25,000 feet: factors affecting group process and aircrew performance. Am Psychologist. 1984;39:885-893.
15. Pronovost PJ, Weast B, Rosenstein B, et al. Implementing and validating a comprehensive unit-based safety program. J Patient Safety. 2005;1:33-40.
16. Muthén B. 1990. Means and Covariance Structure Analysis of Hierarchical Data [no. 62]. Los Angeles: UCLA Statistics Series, 1990.
17. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ. From micro to meso: critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Org Res Methods. 2000;3:211-236.
18. Bliese P. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: implications for data aggregation and analysis. In: Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.
19. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Millbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44:166-206.
20. DeFontes J, Subida S. Preoperative safety briefing project. Permanente J. 2004;8:21-27.