Sex-related natal dispersal of Pied Flycatchers: How far away from home?

Condor

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 711-717

  Chernetsov, Nikita ^a,b   Sokolov, Leonid V ^a   Kosarev, Vladislav ^a   Leoke, Dmitry ^a   Markovets, Mikhail ^a   Tsvey, Arseny ^a   Shapoval, Anatoly P ^a  

^a Zoological Institute   (Russian Federation)

^b ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Natal dispersal; Pied Flycatcher; Return rate; Sex bias

Indexed keywords

FICEDULA HYPOLEUCA;

EID: 33748087446     PISSN: 00105422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1650/0010-5422(2006)108[711:SNDOPF]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ARTEMYEV, A. V. 1994. Relationship of the Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) to territory in the south-eastern Ladoga area [in Russian], p. 28-44. In V. B. Zimin [ED.], Territorial behavior of birds. Karelian Research Centre, Petrozavodsk, Russia.
2. BAKER, M., N. NUR, AND G. R. GEUPEL. 1995. Correcting biased estimates of dispersal and survival due to a limited study area: theory and an application using Wrentits. Condor 97: 663-674.
3. BERNDT, R., AND H. STERNBERG. 1969. Alters- und Geschlechtsunterschiede in der Dispersion des Trauerschnäppers (Ficedula hypoleuca). Journal für Ornithologie 110:22-26.
4. BERNDT, R., AND W. WINKEL. 1979. Verfrachtungs-Experimente zur Frage der Geburtsortsprägung beim Trauerschnäpper (Ficedula hypoleuca). Journal für Ornithologie 120:41-53.
5. CLOBERT, J., E. DANCHIN, A. A. DHONT, and J. D. NICHOLS [EDS.]. 2001, Dispersal. Oxford University Press, New York.
6. GARANT, D., L. E. B. KRUUK, T. A. WILKIN, W. H. MCCLEERY, AND B. C. SHELDON. 2005. Evolution driven by differential dispersal within a wild bird population. Nature 433:60-65.
7. GLUTZ VON BLOTZHEIM, U. N. and K. M. BAUER [EDS.]. 1993, Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Band 13, Teil 1. AULA, Wiesbaden, Germany.
8. GREENWOOD, P. J. 1980. Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Animal Behaviour 28:1140-1162.
9. HANSKI, I., AND M. E. GILPIN. 1997. Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, London.
10. JOHNSON, M. L., AND M. S. GAINES. 1990. Evolution of dispersal: theoretical models and empirical tests using birds and mammals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21:229-480.
11. KOENIG, W., P. N. HOOGE, N. T. STANBACK, AND J. HAYDOCK. 2000. Natal dispersal in the co-operatively breeding Acorn Woodpecker. Condor 102:492-502.
12. LÖHRL, H. 1959. Zur Frage des Zeitpunktes einer Prägung auf die Heimatregion beim Halsbandschnäpper, Ficedula albicollis. Journal für Ornithologie 100:132-140.
13. LUNDBERG, A., AND R. V. ALATALO. 1992. The Pied Flycatcher. T and AD Poyser, London.
14. PAYEVSKY, V. A. 1999. Breeding biology, morphometrics, and population dynamics of Sylvia warblers in the Eastern Baltic. Avian Ecology and Behaviour 2:19-50.
15. POSTMA, E., AND A. J. VAN NOORDWIJK. 2005. Gene flow maintains a large genetic difference in clutch size at a small spatial scale. Nature 433: 65-68.
16. SOKOLOV, L. V. 1997. Philopatry of migratory birds, p. 1-58. In T. M. Turpaev [ED.], Physiology and general biology reviews 11. Harwood Academic Press, Amsterdam.
17. SOKOLOV, L. V., V. G. VYSOTSKY, AND A. V. BARDIN. 1990. Philopatry and natal dispersal of the Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) at the Courish Spit of the Baltic Sea [in Russian]. Ornithologia 24:5-19.
18. SOKOLOV, L. V., V. G. VYSOTSKY, V. M. GAVRILOV, AND A. B. KERIMOV. 1994. Experimental test of philopatry population differences in Pied Flycatcher, Ficedula hypoleuca [in Russian]. Doklady Russian Academy of Sciences, Biology Series 335:538-539.
19. SWINGLAND, I. R. 1983. Intraspecific differences in movement, p. 102-115. In I. R. Swingland and P. J. Greenwood [EDS.], The ecology of animal movement. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
20. VALKIUNAS, G. 2004. Avian malaria parasites and other haemosporidia. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
21. VYSOTSKY, V. G. 1994. An analysis of some cases of long-distance dispersal in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca [in Russian]. Russian Journal of Ornithology 3:207-212.
22. VYSOTSKY, V. G. 2000. Structure of the local population in birds: the example of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca [in Russian]. Ph.D. dissertation, Zoological Institute, St. Petersburg.
23. VYSOTSKY, V. G. 2001. Do the data on post-fledging dispersal of Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca support the concept of imprinting a local area? Avian Ecology and Behaviour 6:83-84.
24. VYSOTSKY, V. G., A. V. BARDIN, AND L. V. SOKOLOV. 1990. Distance of post-fledging dispersal of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca [in Russian]. Proceedings of the Zoological Institute Leningrad 210:35-45.
25. VYSOTSKY, V. G., AND G. A. VALKIUNAS. 1992. Population structure in the Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) and the Great Tit (Parus major) according to the data on blood parasites [in Russian]. Russian Journal of Ornithology 1:85-95.
26. WALTER, J. 2000. Dispersal behavior: an ornithological frontier. Condor 102:479-481.
27. WHITLOCK, M. C. 2001. Dispersal and the genetic properties of metapopulations, p. 273-298. In J. Clobert, E. Danchin, A. A. Dhont, and J. D. Nichols [EDS.], Dispersal. Oxford University Press, New York.
28. WINKEL, W. 1982. Zum Ortstreue-Verhalten des Trauerschnäppers (Ficedula hypoleuca) im westlichen Randbereich seines mitteleuropäischen Verbreitungsgebietes. Journal für Ornithologie 123:155-173.