Continuing Professional Development-is it beneficial?

Physiotherapy

Volumn 90, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 174-175

  O'Sullivan, Julia ^a  

^a The Chartered Society of Physiotherapists London WCIR 4ED   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINUING EDUCATION; EDITORIAL; EMPLOYMENT; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PATIENT CARE; PHYSIOTHERAPIST ATTITUDE; PHYSIOTHERAPY PRACTICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; RESPONSIBILITY; STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 33748072463     PISSN: 00319406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2004.10.002     Document Type: Editorial

References (8)

1. In: Woodward I. (Ed). CPD: issues in design and delivery (1996), Cassell, London
2. Madden C.A., and Mitchell V.A. Professions, standards and competence. a survey of continuing education for the professions (1993), University of Bristol, Bristol
3. Friedman A., Davis K., Durkin C., and Phillips M. Continuing professional development in the UK: policies and prgrammes (2000), PARN, Bristol
4. Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Policy statement on continuing professional development. London: CSP; 2003.
5. McCormick G., and Marshall E. Mandatory continuing professional education: a review. Aust Physiother 40 1 (1994) 17-22
6. Beggs C., and Sumsion T. After the workshop: a model to evaluate long-term benefits of continuing education. Physiother Can Fall (1997) 279-291
7. Cervero R. Continuing professional education in transition, 1981-2000. Int J Lifelong Educ 20 1/2 (2001) 16-30
8. O'Sullivan J. Unlocking the workforce potential: is support for effective continuing professional development (CPD) the key?. J Res Post-Compulsory Educ 8 1 (2003) 107-122